Suppr超能文献

用于记录锁骨前伸、后缩、上抬和下压终末位时肩胛骨姿势的肩峰标记簇的可靠性和有效性

Reliability and Validity of an Acromion Marker Cluster for Recording Scapula Posture at End Range Clavicle Protraction, Retraction, Elevation, and Depression.

作者信息

Bet-Or Yaheli, van den Hoorn Wolbert, Johnston Venerina, O'Leary Shaun

机构信息

1 The University of Queensland.

2 Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Queensland Health.

出版信息

J Appl Biomech. 2017 Oct 1;33(5):379-383. doi: 10.1123/jab.2017-0058. Epub 2017 Oct 3.

Abstract

Acromion marker cluster (AMC) methods have been shown to accurately track scapula motion during humeral elevation below 90°, however, their accuracy has not been assessed in shoulder girdle motion such as clavicle protraction, retraction, elevation, and depression independent of humeral movement. The aim of this study was to examine the reliability and validity of the AMC method to record scapula orientation at end range clavicle protraction, retraction, elevation, and depression. The right scapulae of 22 female and 20 male asymptomatic volunteers were assessed with an AMC and scapula locator (SL) method during end range clavicle protraction, retraction, elevation, and depression (without humeral elevation) using an 8-camera 3D movement registration system. Measurements recorded from the AMC and SL measures showed fair to excellent agreement (ICC 0.4-0.92). While the AMC method overestimated and underestimated scapular motion in some planes compared to the SL, root mean square error between methods were low for scapular internal/external rotation (2.3-3.7°), upward/downward rotation (4.5-6.6°), and anterior/posterior tilt (3.2-5.1°), across all conditions. The AMC method was shown to be a reliable and valid measurement of scapula orientation at end range clavicle movements independent of humeral movement.

摘要

肩峰标记簇(AMC)方法已被证明在肱骨抬高低于90°时能准确跟踪肩胛骨运动,然而,其准确性尚未在与肱骨运动无关的肩带运动(如锁骨前伸、后缩、抬高和下压)中得到评估。本研究的目的是检验AMC方法在记录锁骨前伸、后缩、抬高和下压终末位时肩胛骨方向的可靠性和有效性。使用8台摄像机的三维运动记录系统,在锁骨前伸、后缩、抬高和下压(无肱骨抬高)终末位时,采用AMC和肩胛骨定位器(SL)方法对22名女性和20名男性无症状志愿者的右侧肩胛骨进行评估。AMC和SL测量记录显示一致性良好至优秀(组内相关系数0.4 - 0.92)。虽然与SL相比,AMC方法在某些平面上高估和低估了肩胛骨运动,但在所有情况下,两种方法之间肩胛骨内/外旋转(2.3 - 3.7°)、上/下旋转(4.5 - 6.6°)和前/后倾斜(3.2 - 5.1°)的均方根误差较低。AMC方法被证明是一种可靠且有效的测量方法,可用于记录与肱骨运动无关的锁骨运动终末位时的肩胛骨方向。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验