Nagai Mizuyoshi, Itoh Tomonori, Ishida Masaru, Fusazaki Tetsuya, Komatsu Takashi, Nakamura Motoyuki, Morino Yoshihiro
Division of Cardiology Department of Internal Medicine Memorial Heart Center Iwate Medical University Morioka Iwate Japan.
J Arrhythm. 2019 Jan 24;35(2):182-189. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12154. eCollection 2019 Apr.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).
A total 648 of consecutive ACS patients were divided into non-AF and all-AF groups. The all-AF group was further subdivided into new-onset AF and pre-existing AF groups. We compared prognosis among these groups using the Cox regression analysis.
The mean follow-up period was 1.4 ± 1.2 years. Overall patient numbers were 538 in non-AF and 110 in all-AF groups (67 in new-onset AF and 43 in pre-existing AF). Seventy-eight all-cause deaths and 42 cardiac deaths were observed. New-onset AF had a worse prognosis than the other groups in the Kaplan-Meier analysis ( = 0.025) after observation. Cox regression analysis indicated no significant difference for all-cause death among the three groups. The hazard ratio of congestive heart failure requiring hospitalization was significantly higher in the all-AF and new-onset AF group than in the non-AF group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that renal dysfunction, peripheral arterial disease, Killip classification ≥2, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were independent predictors of all-cause death. The new-onset AF group had the highest prevalence of Killip classification ≥2 and the lowest LVEF.
In our study, AF was not an independent predictor of all-cause death, but new-onset AF may be associated with worse prognosis and future heart failure.
本研究旨在评估急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者中房颤(AF)的预后价值。
连续纳入648例ACS患者,分为非房颤组和房颤组。房颤组进一步细分为新发房颤组和既往房颤组。我们使用Cox回归分析比较这些组之间的预后。
平均随访期为1.4±1.2年。非房颤组患者总数为538例,房颤组为110例(新发房颤组67例,既往房颤组43例)。观察到78例全因死亡和42例心源性死亡。在观察后的Kaplan-Meier分析中,新发房颤组的预后比其他组差(P=0.025)。Cox回归分析表明三组全因死亡无显著差异。房颤组和新发房颤组因充血性心力衰竭需要住院治疗的风险比显著高于非房颤组。多因素逻辑回归分析显示,肾功能不全、外周动脉疾病、Killip分级≥2以及左心室射血分数(LVEF)是全因死亡的独立预测因素。新发房颤组Killip分级≥2的患病率最高,LVEF最低。
在我们的研究中,房颤不是全因死亡的独立预测因素,但新发房颤可能与更差的预后和未来心力衰竭相关。