Jaguste Veena Shridhar
CEO, Medicines n We, Clinical Research and Healthcare Consultant, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Perspect Clin Res. 2019 Apr-Jun;10(2):57-61. doi: 10.4103/picr.PICR_18_18.
The United States Food and Drug Administration issued a guidance to industry in August 2013 on risk-based approach to monitoring. This prompted industry (sponsors and contract research organizations) to brainstorm, conceptualize, and implement risk-based monitoring (RBM) in their clinical studies and programs. The acceptance and implementation across the organizations have been variable in terms of pace and methodology. Published literature, commentaries, and views through Internet search were reviewed to understand the perceptions about RBM of different key stakeholders whose function has been significantly impacted, as these highlight ground-level challenges while implementing this major change. Some solutions are proposed to address these perceptions and challenges, as sooner than later RBM will become a way of life, given that recent ICH E6, revision 2 (November 2016) includes RBM in the document. Conceptual clarity, change management, skillset, and capacity building will be the key areas of focus to make RBM successful.
2013年8月,美国食品药品监督管理局向业界发布了一份关于基于风险的监查方法的指南。这促使业界(申办方和合同研究组织)在其临床研究和项目中集思广益、形成概念并实施基于风险的监查(RBM)。各组织在接受程度和实施方面,在速度和方法上存在差异。通过文献检索回顾已发表的文献、评论和观点,以了解不同关键利益相关者对RBM的看法,这些利益相关者的职能受到了重大影响,因为这些突出了实施这一重大变革时的基层挑战。针对这些看法和挑战提出了一些解决方案,鉴于最近的国际人用药品注册技术协调会(ICH)E6修订版2(2016年11月)在文件中纳入了RBM,RBM迟早会成为一种常态。概念清晰、变革管理、技能组合和能力建设将是使RBM取得成功的关键重点领域。