Wang Yuanyuan, Teichtahl Andrew J, Wluka Anita E, Pelletier Jean-Pierre, Abram François, Martel-Pelletier Johanne, Cicuttini Flavia M
School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
University of Montreal Hospital Research Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2020 Jun;72(6):778-786. doi: 10.1002/acr.23906. Epub 2020 May 15.
To examine whether joint line tenderness and patellofemoral grind from physical examination were associated with cartilage volume loss, worsening of radiographic osteoarthritis, and the risk of total knee replacement.
This study examined 4,353 Osteoarthritis Initiative participants. For each measurement of joint line tenderness and patellofemoral grind, the patterns were defined as no (none at baseline and at 1 year), fluctuating (present at either time point), and persistent (present at both time points). Cartilage volume loss and worsening of radiographic osteoarthritis over 4 years were assessed using magnetic resonance imaging and radiographs, and total knee replacement over 6 years was assessed.
A total of 35.0% of participants had joint line tenderness, and 15.8% had patellofemoral grind. Baseline patellofemoral grind, but not joint line tenderness, was associated with increased cartilage volume loss (1.08% per year versus 0.96% per year; P = 0.02) and an increased risk of total knee replacement (odds ratio [OR] 1.55 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.11-2.17]; P = 0.01). While the patterns of joint line tenderness were not significantly associated with joint outcomes, participants with persistent patellofemoral grind had an increased rate of cartilage volume loss (1.30% per year versus 0.90% per year; P < 0.001) and an increased risk of total knee replacement (OR 2.10 [95% CI 1.30-3.38]; P = 0.002) compared with those participants without patellofemoral grind.
Patellofemoral grind, but not joint line tenderness, may represent a clinical marker associated with accelerated cartilage volume loss over 4 years and an increased risk of total knee replacement over 6 years. This simple clinical examination may provide clinicians with an inexpensive way to identify those at higher risk of disease progression who should be targeted for surveillance and management.
探讨体格检查中的关节线压痛和髌股研磨试验是否与软骨体积丢失、影像学骨关节炎的进展以及全膝关节置换的风险相关。
本研究纳入了4353名骨关节炎倡议项目的参与者。对于每次关节线压痛和髌股研磨试验的测量,其模式被定义为无(基线和1年时均无)、波动(在两个时间点中的任一时刻出现)和持续(在两个时间点均出现)。使用磁共振成像和X线片评估4年内的软骨体积丢失和影像学骨关节炎的进展情况,并评估6年内的全膝关节置换情况。
共有35.0%的参与者有关节线压痛,15.8%的参与者有髌股研磨试验阳性。基线时髌股研磨试验阳性,但关节线压痛无此情况,与软骨体积丢失增加相关(每年1.08% 对比每年0.96%;P = 0.02)以及全膝关节置换风险增加(比值比[OR] 1.55 [95%置信区间(95%CI) 1.11 - 2.17];P = 0.01)。虽然关节线压痛模式与关节结局无显著相关性,但与无髌股研磨试验阳性的参与者相比,持续存在髌股研磨试验阳性的参与者软骨体积丢失率增加(每年1.30% 对比每年0.90%;P < 0.001)以及全膝关节置换风险增加(OR 2.10 [95%CI 1.30 - 3.38];P = 0.002)。
髌股研磨试验阳性而非关节线压痛,可能代表一种临床标志物,与4年内软骨体积加速丢失以及6年内全膝关节置换风险增加相关。这种简单的临床检查可能为临床医生提供一种廉价的方法,以识别那些疾病进展风险较高的患者,这些患者应作为监测和管理的目标对象。