• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两阶段协作考试后的保留率取决于时间和学生表现。

Retention following Two-Stage Collaborative Exams Depends on Timing and Student Performance.

机构信息

Biology Department, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.

Carl Wieman Science Education Initiative, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.

出版信息

CBE Life Sci Educ. 2019 Jun;18(2):ar12. doi: 10.1187/cbe.17-07-0137.

DOI:10.1187/cbe.17-07-0137
PMID:31008674
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6755206/
Abstract

Multistage collaborative exams are implemented to enhance learning and retention of course material. However, the effects of multistage collaborative exams on retention of course content are varied. These discrepancies may be due to a number of factors. To date, studies examining collaborative exams and content retention have used questions that all, or mostly, require students to select an answer, rather than generate one of their own. However, content retention can improve when students generate their own responses. Thus, we examined the effect of collaborative exams with open-ended questions on retention of course content. Retention was measured at two time periods; one relatively shortly (9 days) following a collaborative exam and another over a longer time period (23 days). Furthermore, we examined whether content retention differed for low-, mid-, or high--performing students. Our results suggest that collaborative exams offer retention benefits at relatively long time periods between pre- and posttests, but not over shorter time periods. Retention varied across students in different performance categories. Our study, the first to use only open-ended questions, showed relatively small effects compared with studies using multiple-choice or fill-in-the-blank format, but still suggest that collaborative exams can aid in content retention.

摘要

多阶段协作考试被实施以增强对课程材料的学习和保留。然而,多阶段协作考试对保留课程内容的效果是不同的。这些差异可能归因于许多因素。迄今为止,研究协作考试和内容保留的研究使用的问题都是要求学生选择答案,而不是自己生成答案。然而,当学生生成自己的回答时,内容保留可以得到提高。因此,我们研究了具有开放式问题的协作考试对课程内容保留的影响。保留程度在两个时间段进行测量;一个是在协作考试后相对较短的时间(9 天),另一个是在较长的时间(23 天)。此外,我们还研究了内容保留是否因低、中、高表现学生而有所不同。我们的结果表明,协作考试在前后测之间的相对较长时间内提供了保留的好处,但在较短的时间内则没有。不同表现类别的学生之间的保留程度存在差异。我们的研究是首次仅使用开放式问题,与使用多项选择或填空格式的研究相比,效果相对较小,但仍表明协作考试可以帮助保留内容。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a63e/6755206/0513c89c8852/cbe-18-ar12-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a63e/6755206/d82e2bbc936c/cbe-18-ar12-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a63e/6755206/cbfc403e97de/cbe-18-ar12-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a63e/6755206/0513c89c8852/cbe-18-ar12-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a63e/6755206/d82e2bbc936c/cbe-18-ar12-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a63e/6755206/cbfc403e97de/cbe-18-ar12-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a63e/6755206/0513c89c8852/cbe-18-ar12-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Retention following Two-Stage Collaborative Exams Depends on Timing and Student Performance.两阶段协作考试后的保留率取决于时间和学生表现。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2019 Jun;18(2):ar12. doi: 10.1187/cbe.17-07-0137.
2
Student retention of course content is improved by collaborative-group testing.通过小组协作测试可提高学生对课程内容的记忆。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2003 Dec;27(1-4):102-8. doi: 10.1152/advan.00041.2002.
3
Collaborative testing improves performance but not content retention in a large-enrollment introductory biology class.协作测试提高了大班级入门生物学课程的表现,但没有提高内容保留率。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2012 Winter;11(4):392-401. doi: 10.1187/cbe.12-04-0048.
4
Collaborative Two-Stage Exams Benefit Students in a Biology Laboratory Course.协作式两阶段考试对生物实验室课程中的学生有益。
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2022 Dec 1;24(1). doi: 10.1128/jmbe.00138-22. eCollection 2023 Apr.
5
Collaborative-group testing improves learning and knowledge retention of human physiology topics in second-year medical students.合作小组测试可提高二年级医学生对人体生理学主题的学习效果和知识留存率。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2018 Jun 1;42(2):232-239. doi: 10.1152/advan.00113.2017.
6
Collaborative group testing benefits high- and low-performing students.合作小组测试对成绩优异和成绩较差的学生都有益处。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2008 Dec;32(4):274-8. doi: 10.1152/advan.00101.2007.
7
Requiring students to justify answer changes during collaborative testing may be necessary for improved academic performance.在协作测试期间要求学生为答案更改提供理由,这对于提高学业成绩可能是必要的。
J Chiropr Educ. 2017 Oct;31(2):96-101. doi: 10.7899/JCE-16-5. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
8
Assessment of a novel group-centered testing schema in an upper-level undergraduate molecular biotechnology course.在本科高年级分子生物技术课程中对一种新型的小组集中测试模式的评估。
Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2013 Jul-Aug;41(4):232-41. doi: 10.1002/bmb.20701.
9
The impact of weekly multicourse collective exams on pharmacy student academic behaviors and learning in an integrated biological sciences course.周多门课程集体考试对药学专业学生在综合生物科学课程中的学术行为和学习的影响。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2021 Sep 1;45(3):575-579. doi: 10.1152/advan.00065.2021.
10
Question-writing as a learning tool for students--outcomes from curricular exams.问题式写作作为学生的学习工具——课程考试的结果。
BMC Med Educ. 2013 Jun 21;13:89. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-89.

引用本文的文献

1
Optional Exam Retakes Reduce Anxiety but may Exacerbate Score Disparities Between Students with Different Social Identities.选修考试重考可减少焦虑,但可能加剧不同社会身份学生之间的分数差距。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2024 Sep;23(3):ar30. doi: 10.1187/cbe.21-11-0320.
2
Collaborative Assessment in the Gross Anatomy Lab.大体解剖实验室中的协作评估
Med Sci Educ. 2023 Oct 14;34(1):57-69. doi: 10.1007/s40670-023-01908-7. eCollection 2024 Feb.
3
Forming Groups in a Large-Enrollment Biology Class: Group Permanence Matters More than Group Size.

本文引用的文献

1
Collaborative testing improves performance but not content retention in a large-enrollment introductory biology class.协作测试提高了大班级入门生物学课程的表现,但没有提高内容保留率。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2012 Winter;11(4):392-401. doi: 10.1187/cbe.12-04-0048.
2
Changes in team cognition after a retention interval: the benefits of mixing it up.保留间隔后团队认知的变化:混合的好处。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2011 Dec;17(4):303-19. doi: 10.1037/a0025149. Epub 2011 Aug 22.
3
Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions.
在大型生物学课中分组:组的稳定性比组的大小更重要。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2023 Dec;22(4):ar37. doi: 10.1187/cbe.22-08-0172.
4
Collaborative Two-Stage Exams Benefit Students in a Biology Laboratory Course.协作式两阶段考试对生物实验室课程中的学生有益。
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2022 Dec 1;24(1). doi: 10.1128/jmbe.00138-22. eCollection 2023 Apr.
5
What I Wish My Instructor Knew: How Active Learning Influences the Classroom Experiences and Self-Advocacy of STEM Majors with ADHD and Specific Learning Disabilities.我希望我的导师知道什么:主动学习如何影响 ADHD 和特定学习障碍的 STEM 专业学生的课堂体验和自我倡导。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2023 Mar;22(1):ar2. doi: 10.1187/cbe.21-12-0329.
6
Promoting Academic Integrity and Student Learning in Online Biology Courses.在在线生物学课程中促进学术诚信与学生学习。
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2021 Mar 31;22(1). doi: 10.1128/jmbe.v22i1.2291. eCollection 2021.
7
Online and Clicker Quizzing on Jargon Terms Enhances Definition-Focused but Not Conceptually Focused Biology Exam Performance.在线和点击器测验术语可提高专注于定义的生物学考试成绩,但不能提高概念性考试成绩。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2019 Dec;18(4):ar54. doi: 10.1187/cbe.18-12-0248.
同伴讨论为何能提高学生在课堂概念问题上的表现。
Science. 2009 Jan 2;323(5910):122-4. doi: 10.1126/science.1165919.
4
Collaborative group testing benefits high- and low-performing students.合作小组测试对成绩优异和成绩较差的学生都有益处。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2008 Dec;32(4):274-8. doi: 10.1152/advan.00101.2007.
5
Test-enhanced learning: taking memory tests improves long-term retention.测试强化学习:进行记忆测试可提高长期记忆保持能力。
Psychol Sci. 2006 Mar;17(3):249-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x.
6
Student retention of course content is improved by collaborative-group testing.通过小组协作测试可提高学生对课程内容的记忆。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2003 Dec;27(1-4):102-8. doi: 10.1152/advan.00041.2002.
7
Collaborative testing to promote learning.通过合作测试促进学习。
J Nurs Educ. 2003 Mar;42(3):121-4. doi: 10.3928/0148-4834-20030301-07.
8
Collaborative testing enhances student learning.合作测试能提高学生的学习效果。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2002 Dec;26(1-4):37-41. doi: 10.1152/advan.00032.2001.