Department of Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Department of Anaesthesiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2019 May;114(5):813-821. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000224.
The ideal analgesic is not known for patients with acute pancreatitis (AP). Concerns have been raised about serious adverse effects of opioid analgesics increasing the severity of AP. We hypothesized that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs might be better analgesics because of their anti-inflammatory effect. Our objective was to compare pentazocine, an opioid, and diclofenac, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, for adequate analgesia in patients with AP.
In a double-blind randomized controlled trial, patients with AP were randomized to either intravenous diclofenac 75 mg or pentazocine 30 mg. Fentanyl was given as a rescue analgesic through a patient-controlled analgesia pump. Primary outcome was pain relief measured objectively by the dose of fentanyl required as the rescue analgesic, pain-free period, and numbers of effective and ineffective demands of fentanyl. Secondary outcome was adverse events.
Fifty patients were randomized, 24 to the pentazocine group and 26 to the diclofenac group. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups. Pentazocine was found to be better than diclofenac in terms of significantly lower dose of the rescue analgesic (fentanyl) required (126 μg (interquartile range (IQR) 65-218 μg) vs 225.5 μg (IQR 133-427 μg); P = 0.028) and longer pain-free period (31.1 ± 8.2 vs 27.9 ± 6.6 hours, P = 0.047). The number of effective and ineffective demands was lower in the pentazocine group compared with the diclofenac group (11.5 (IQR 8-15) vs 16 (IQR 13-20), P = 0.098) although not statistically significant. Adverse events were similar between the groups.
Pentazocine, a kappa-opioid receptor agonist, was significantly better than diclofenac for pain relief in AP (Trial registration number: CTRI/2016/09/007326).
对于患有急性胰腺炎(AP)的患者,目前还没有理想的镇痛药。人们对阿片类镇痛药可能会加重 AP 严重程度的严重不良反应表示担忧。我们假设非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)可能是更好的镇痛药,因为它们具有抗炎作用。我们的目的是比较阿片类药物喷他佐辛和 NSAIDs 双氯芬酸在 AP 患者中的镇痛效果。
在一项双盲随机对照试验中,将 AP 患者随机分为静脉注射双氯芬酸 75mg 或喷他佐辛 30mg 组。芬太尼通过患者自控镇痛泵作为解救性镇痛药。主要结局是通过所需的芬太尼解救性镇痛药剂量、无疼痛期、芬太尼有效和无效需求的次数来客观测量的疼痛缓解程度。次要结局是不良事件。
共随机分配了 50 例患者,其中 24 例分配到喷他佐辛组,26 例分配到双氯芬酸组。两组患者的基线特征无差异。与双氯芬酸相比,喷他佐辛在需要的解救性镇痛药(芬太尼)剂量明显更低(126μg(四分位间距(IQR)65-218μg)vs 225.5μg(IQR 133-427μg);P=0.028)和更长的无疼痛期(31.1±8.2 vs 27.9±6.6 小时,P=0.047)方面表现更好。与双氯芬酸组相比,喷他佐辛组的有效和无效需求次数更少(11.5(IQR 8-15)vs 16(IQR 13-20),P=0.098),但差异无统计学意义。两组不良事件相似。
阿片类药物κ受体激动剂喷他佐辛在缓解 AP 疼痛方面明显优于双氯芬酸(试验注册号:CTRI/2016/09/007326)。