Suppr超能文献

医疗保险受益人的阿片类药物处方结果由护士从业者和医生管理。

Opioid-prescribing Outcomes of Medicare Beneficiaries Managed by Nurse Practitioners and Physicians.

机构信息

Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Nursing.

Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.

出版信息

Med Care. 2019 Jun;57(6):482-489. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001126.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Primary care providers are at the center of the opioid epidemic. Whether nurse practitioners (NPs) have different opioid-prescribing outcomes from physicians is not known.

OBJECTIVE

To examine opioid-prescribing outcomes of Medicare beneficiaries receiving care from NPs and physicians in primary care.

RESEARCH DESIGN

We used Medicare data from 2009 to 2013 and a propensity score-weighted analysis.

SUBJECTS

Beneficiaries residing in states in which NPs are able to prescribe controlled substances without physician oversight and who did not have a cancer diagnosis, hospice care, or end-stage renal disease.

MEASURES

First, we measured whether beneficiaries received any opioid prescription. Second, for beneficiaries who received opioids, we measured acute (<90 d supply) and chronic (≥90 d supply) use at baseline (2009-2010) and follow-up (2012-2013). Third, we measured potential misuse of opioid prescribing using a daily morphine milligram equivalent dose of >100 mg, overlapping prescriptions of opioids >7 days, and overlapping prescriptions of opioids with benzodiazepines >7 days.

RESULTS

Beneficiaries managed by NPs were less likely to receive an opioid [odds ratio (OR), 0.87; P<0.001], were less likely to be acute users at baseline (OR, 0.84; P<0.001), and were more likely to receive a high daily opioid dose of morphine milligram equivalent >100 mg compared with physician-managed beneficiaries (OR, 1.11; P=0.048).

CONCLUSIONS

Findings suggest educational programs and clinical guidelines may require approaches tailored to different providers. Future research should examine the contributing factors of these patterns to ensure high-quality pain management and guide policy makers on NP-controlled substance-prescribing regulations.

摘要

背景

初级保健提供者处于阿片类药物流行的中心。护士从业者 (NPs) 的阿片类药物处方结果是否与医生不同尚不清楚。

目的

检查初级保健中接受 NPs 和医生治疗的 Medicare 受益人的阿片类药物处方结果。

研究设计

我们使用了 2009 年至 2013 年的 Medicare 数据和倾向评分加权分析。

受试者

居住在允许 NPs 在没有医生监督的情况下开具受控物质处方且没有癌症诊断、临终关怀或终末期肾病的州的受益人。

措施

首先,我们衡量受益人是否收到任何阿片类药物处方。其次,对于接受阿片类药物的受益人,我们在基线(2009-2010 年)和随访(2012-2013 年)时衡量急性(<90 天供应量)和慢性(≥90 天供应量)使用情况。第三,我们使用每日吗啡毫克当量剂量> 100 毫克、阿片类药物重叠处方> 7 天和阿片类药物与苯二氮䓬类药物重叠处方> 7 天来衡量潜在的阿片类药物处方滥用。

结果

由 NPs 管理的受益人接受阿片类药物的可能性较低[优势比(OR),0.87;P<0.001],基线时急性使用者的可能性较低(OR,0.84;P<0.001),并且与医生管理的受益人相比,更有可能接受高剂量吗啡毫克当量> 100 毫克的每日阿片类药物剂量(OR,1.11;P=0.048)。

结论

研究结果表明,教育计划和临床指南可能需要针对不同的提供者采用不同的方法。未来的研究应该检查这些模式的促成因素,以确保高质量的疼痛管理,并为政策制定者提供有关 NP 控制物质处方法规的指导。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验