• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Between the Error Bars: How Modern Theory, Design, and Methodology Enrich the Personality-Health Tradition.在误差范围内:现代理论、设计和方法如何丰富人格-健康传统。
Psychosom Med. 2019 Jun;81(5):408-414. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000701.
2
Status of the Trait Concept in Contemporary Personality Psychology: Are the Old Questions Still the Burning Questions?当代人格心理学特质概念的现状:旧问题仍是热点问题吗?
J Pers. 2018 Feb;86(1):5-11. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12335.
3
Personality as continuous stochastic process: what Western personality theory can learn from classical confucianism.作为连续随机过程的人格:西方人格理论能从经典儒家思想中学到什么。
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2014 Jun;48(2):111-28. doi: 10.1007/s12124-013-9250-2.
4
Methodology of research in psychosomatic medicine.心身医学研究方法学
Br Med J. 1972 Nov 4;4(5835):285-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.4.5835.285.
5
Psychosomatic approach is the new medicine tailored for patient personality with a focus on ethics, economy, and quality.身心医学方法是一种针对患者个性的新型医学,注重伦理、经济和质量。
Panminerva Med. 2010 Sep;52(3):249-64.
6
Methodological issues in psychosomatic research.
Adv Psychosom Med. 1987;17:1-12. doi: 10.1159/000414002.
7
Personality Traits: Hierarchically Organized Systems.人格特质:层次化组织系统。
J Pers. 2018 Feb;86(1):36-54. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12314. Epub 2017 May 18.
8
Toward an integrative science of the person.迈向关于人的综合科学。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2004;55:1-22. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.042902.130709.
9
Simpson's paradox in psychological science: a practical guide.心理学中的辛普森悖论:实用指南。
Front Psychol. 2013 Aug 12;4:513. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00513. eCollection 2013.
10
The Future of Personality Theory: a Processual Approach.人格理论的未来:一种过程性方法。
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2018 Jun;52(2):296-306. doi: 10.1007/s12124-018-9420-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Within-person associations of optimistic and pessimistic expectations with momentary stress, affect, and ambulatory blood pressure.个体内乐观和悲观期望与瞬时应激、情感和动态血压的关联。
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2023 Sep;36(5):636-648. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2022.2142574. Epub 2022 Nov 13.
2
Statistical Guideline No. 5. Include Results of a Power Analysis; if a Power Analysis Was Not Performed, Describe the Stopping Rule for Recruitment.统计指导原则 5. 纳入功效分析的结果;如果未进行功效分析,则应描述招募的停止规则。
Int J Behav Med. 2020 Apr;27(2):140-141. doi: 10.1007/s12529-020-09868-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Psychosocial functioning and the cortisol awakening response: Meta-analysis, P-curve analysis, and evaluation of the evidential value in existing studies.心理社会功能与皮质醇觉醒反应:荟萃分析、P曲线分析及对现有研究证据价值的评估
Biol Psychol. 2017 Oct;129:207-230. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.08.058. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
2
Intelligence and Interleukin-6 in Older Adults: The Role of Repetitive Thought.老年人的智力与白细胞介素-6:重复思维的作用。
Psychosom Med. 2017 Sep;79(7):757-762. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000479.
3
Intraindividual variability in cortisol: Approaches, illustrations, and recommendations.皮质醇的个体内变异性:方法、示例与建议。
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2017 Apr;78:114-124. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2017.01.026. Epub 2017 Jan 28.
4
Investigating Reliabilities of Intraindividual Variability Indicators.个体内变异性指标的可靠性研究。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2012 Sep;47(5):771-802. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2012.715842.
5
Beyond Power Calculations: Assessing Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) Errors.超越功效计算:评估 S 型(信号)和 M 型(幅度)误差。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2014 Nov;9(6):641-51. doi: 10.1177/1745691614551642.
6
Variability Modifies Life Satisfaction's Association With Mortality Risk in Older Adults.变异性改变了老年人生活满意度与死亡风险之间的关联。
Psychol Sci. 2015 Jul;26(7):1063-70. doi: 10.1177/0956797615581491. Epub 2015 Jun 5.
7
Briefly Assessing Repetitive Thought Dimensions: Valence, Purpose, and Total.简要评估重复性思维维度:效价、目的和总量。
Assessment. 2016 Oct;23(5):614-23. doi: 10.1177/1073191115586458. Epub 2015 May 27.
8
Latent trait cortisol (LTC) levels: reliability, validity, and stability.潜在特质皮质醇(LTC)水平:信度、效度与稳定性
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2015 May;55:21-35. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2015.01.017. Epub 2015 Feb 9.
9
Variability and reliability of diurnal cortisol in younger and older adults: implications for design decisions.年轻人和老年人日间皮质醇的变异性和可靠性:对设计决策的影响。
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2014 Nov;49:299-309. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2014.07.022. Epub 2014 Aug 12.
10
Repetitive thought dimensions, psychological well-being, and perceived growth in older adults: a multilevel, prospective study.老年人的重复思维维度、心理健康和感知成长:一项多层次前瞻性研究。
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2015;28(3):287-302. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2014.947285. Epub 2014 Aug 19.

在误差范围内:现代理论、设计和方法如何丰富人格-健康传统。

Between the Error Bars: How Modern Theory, Design, and Methodology Enrich the Personality-Health Tradition.

机构信息

From the Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington.

出版信息

Psychosom Med. 2019 Jun;81(5):408-414. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000701.

DOI:10.1097/PSY.0000000000000701
PMID:31008904
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6544503/
Abstract

The study of relationships between personality traits and health has a long history in psychosomatic research. However, personality science has evolved from an understanding of personality as fixed traits to one that acknowledges that personality is dynamic. Dynamic approaches to conceptualizing and measuring personality and individual differences can enrich personality-health research. In this Presidential Address (American Psychosomatic Society, 2018), I consider how different formulations of personality-stable traits, stable signals in a noisy or variable measure, within-person changes, and intraindividual variability-can be implemented to better understand how personality is related to health and particularly to immune function. These approaches recognize and, in some cases, capitalize on the fact that personality factors can display variability as well as stability over time. They also require repeated measurement and therefore greater methodological sophistication that considers reliability and generalizability, Simpson's paradox, and the difference between variability and flexibility. Dynamic qualities of personality and individual differences potentially influence health, and designs and methodology that incorporate them can illuminate the important processes that occur inside the error bars.

摘要

人格特质与健康之间关系的研究在身心医学研究中有着悠久的历史。然而,人格科学已经从对人格是固定特质的理解发展到承认人格是动态的。从概念化和测量人格和个体差异的动态方法可以丰富人格-健康研究。在本次主席演讲(美国身心医学学会,2018 年)中,我考虑了人格稳定特质的不同表述方式、噪声或可变测量中的稳定信号、个体内变化以及个体内可变性,如何能够更好地理解人格与健康的关系,尤其是与免疫功能的关系。这些方法认识到,在某些情况下,人格因素在时间上不仅可以显示稳定性,也可以显示可变性。它们还需要重复测量,因此需要更复杂的方法学,考虑可靠性和可推广性、辛普森悖论以及变异性和灵活性之间的区别。人格和个体差异的动态特征可能会影响健康,并且包含这些特征的设计和方法可以阐明在误差范围内发生的重要过程。