Suppr超能文献

高频和低频抗阻训练对未经训练男性瘦体重和肌肉力量增加的影响。

Influence of High- and Low-Frequency Resistance Training on Lean Body Mass and Muscle Strength Gains in Untrained Men.

机构信息

Exercise Biology Research Group (BioEx), Federal University of Triangulo Mineiro (UFTM), Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil; and.

Department of Sport Sciences, Health Science Institute, Federal University of Triangulo Mineiro (UFTM), Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2021 Aug 1;35(8):2089-2094. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003145.

Abstract

Franco, CMC, Carneiro, MAS, de Sousa, JFR, Gomes, GK, and Orsatti, FL. Influence of high- and low-frequency resistance training on lean body mass and muscle strength gains in untrained men. J Strength Cond Res 35(8): 2089-2094, 2021-The aim of this study was to investigate whether high-frequency resistance training (HFRT) performs better in lean body mass (LBM) and muscle strength gains when compared with low-frequency resistance training (LFRT). Eighteen untrained males (height: 1.76 ± 0.05 m, body mass: 78.3 ± 13.5 kg, and age: 22.1 ± 2.2 years) were randomly allocated into HFRT (n = 9) and LFRT (n = 9). Muscle strength {1 repetition maximum (RM) (bench press [BP] and unilateral leg extension [LE])} and LBM (DXA) were assessed at before and after 8 weeks of training. Both groups performed 7 whole-body resistance exercises, standardized to 10 sets per week, 8-12 maximal repetitions, and 90-120 seconds of rest in a 5-day resistance training routine. The LFRT performed a split-body routine, training each specific muscle group once a week. The HFRT performed a total-body routine, training all muscle groups every session and progressed from a training frequency of once per week to a training frequency of 5 times per week. Lean body mass increased without differences between groups (HFRT = 1.0 kg vs. LFRT = 1.5 kg; p = 0.377). Similarly, 1RM increased without differences between groups (right LE, HFRT = 21.2 kg vs. LFRT = 19.7 kg, p = 0.782; BP, HFRT = 7.1 kg vs. LFRT = 4.5 kg, p = 0.293). These findings suggest that in young untrained men, progressing from a training frequency of once per week to a training frequency of 5 times per week with equated volume produces similar gains in LBM and muscle strength as a constant training frequency of once per week, over an 8-week training period.

摘要

弗朗哥、CMC、卡内罗、MAS、德索萨、JFR、戈麦斯、GK 和奥尔萨蒂、FL。高频阻力训练与低频阻力训练对未训练男性瘦体重和肌肉力量增长的影响。J 力量与条件研究 35(8):2089-2094,2021-本研究旨在探讨高频阻力训练 (HFRT) 是否比低频阻力训练 (LFRT) 更能促进瘦体重 (LBM) 和肌肉力量的增加。18 名未经训练的男性(身高:1.76±0.05m,体重:78.3±13.5kg,年龄:22.1±2.2 岁)被随机分为 HFRT(n=9)和 LFRT(n=9)。肌肉力量{1 次重复最大值(BP 和单侧腿伸展)}和 LBM(DXA)在 8 周训练前后进行评估。两组均进行 7 项全身抗阻运动,每周标准化 10 组,8-12 次最大重复,90-120 秒休息,5 天抗阻训练常规。LFRT 采用分体式常规,每周一次训练每个特定的肌肉群。HFRT 采用全身常规,每次训练所有肌肉群,并从每周一次的训练频率进展到每周 5 次的训练频率。瘦体重增加,两组之间无差异(HFRT=1.0kg 与 LFRT=1.5kg;p=0.377)。同样,1RM 增加两组之间无差异(右 LE,HFRT=21.2kg 与 LFRT=19.7kg,p=0.782;BP,HFRT=7.1kg 与 LFRT=4.5kg,p=0.293)。这些发现表明,在年轻未经训练的男性中,从每周一次的训练频率进展到每周 5 次的训练频率,同时保持相等的训练量,与每周一次的恒定训练频率相比,在 8 周的训练期间,可产生相似的 LBM 和肌肉力量的增加。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验