Suppr超能文献

抗阻训练方式:对身体素质、等速肌肉功能和核心肌肉生物力学影响的比较分析

Resistance training modalities: comparative analysis of effects on physical fitness, isokinetic muscle functions, and core muscle biomechanics.

作者信息

Liu Peng, Yuan Han, Lu YunHang, Gao Zeng

机构信息

College of Martial Arts and Traditional Ethnic Sports, Jilin Sport University, Changchun, China.

Department of Physical Education, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Front Physiol. 2024 Jul 12;15:1424216. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1424216. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of varied resistance training modalities on physical fitness components, body composition, maximal strength assessed by one-repetition maximum (1RM), isokinetic muscle functions of the shoulder and knee joints, and biomechanical properties of core muscles.

METHODS

Forty participants were randomly assigned to four groups: control group (CG, n = 10), compound set training group (CSG, n = 10), pyramid set training group (PSG, n = 10), and superset training group (SSG, n = 10). Excluding the CG, the other three groups underwent an 8-week resistance training program, three sessions per week, at 60%-80% of 1RM intensity for 60-90 min per session. Assessments included body composition, physical fitness components, 1RM, isokinetic muscle functions, and biomechanical properties (muscle frequency, stiffness, etc.) of the rectus abdominis and external oblique muscles.

RESULTS

The PSG demonstrated the most significant improvement in relative peak torque during isokinetic testing of the shoulder and knee joints. Compared to the CG, all exercise groups exhibited positive effects on back strength, sprint performance, 1RM, and core muscle biomechanics. Notably, the PSG showed superior enhancement in external oblique stiffness. However, no significant differences were observed among the exercise groups for rectus abdominis biomechanical properties.

DISCUSSION

Structured resistance training effectively improved maximal strength, functional performance, and core muscle biomechanics. The pyramidal training modality conferred specific benefits for isokinetic muscle functions and external oblique stiffness, suggesting its efficacy in enhancing force production capabilities and core stability.

摘要

引言

本研究旨在评估不同的阻力训练方式对身体素质成分、身体成分、通过一次重复最大值(1RM)评估的最大力量、肩关节和膝关节的等速肌肉功能以及核心肌肉生物力学特性的影响。

方法

40名参与者被随机分为四组:对照组(CG,n = 10)、复合组训练组(CSG,n = 10)、金字塔组训练组(PSG,n = 10)和超级组训练组(SSG,n = 10)。除CG组外,其他三组进行为期8周的阻力训练计划,每周训练三次,每次训练强度为1RM的60%-80%,每次训练时长60-90分钟。评估内容包括身体成分、身体素质成分、1RM、等速肌肉功能以及腹直肌和腹外斜肌的生物力学特性(肌肉频率、僵硬度等)。

结果

PSG组在肩关节和膝关节等速测试中的相对峰值扭矩改善最为显著。与CG组相比,所有运动组在背部力量、短跑成绩、1RM和核心肌肉生物力学方面均表现出积极影响。值得注意的是,PSG组腹外斜肌僵硬度提升更为显著。然而,各运动组在腹直肌生物力学特性方面未观察到显著差异。

讨论

结构化阻力训练有效改善了最大力量、功能表现和核心肌肉生物力学。金字塔训练方式对等速肌肉功能和腹外斜肌僵硬度具有特定益处,表明其在增强力量产生能力和核心稳定性方面的有效性。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验