Department of Thoracic Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 Aug;108(2):590-596. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.03.050. Epub 2019 Apr 19.
To develop and evaluate a surgical trainee competency assessment instrument for invasive mediastinal staging, including cervical mediastinoscopy and endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS), a comprehensive instrument was developed, the Thoracic Competency Assessment Tool-Invasive Staging (TCAT-IS), using expert review and simulated and clinical pilot-testing.
Validity and reliability evidence were collected, and item analysis was performed. Initially, a 27-item instrument was developed, which underwent expert review with members of the Canadian Association of Thoracic Surgeons (n = 86) in 2014 to 2015 (response rate, 57%). TCAT-IS was refined to 29 items in 4 competency areas: preoperative, general operative, mediastinoscopy, and EBUS. Further refinements were made based on simulated use. The final version was then used to assess competency of 5 thoracic trainees performing invasive mediastinal staging in live patients.
Participants were assessed during 20 mediastinoscopy and 8 EBUS procedures, with 47 total assessments completed. Reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.94), interrater reliability (κ = 0.80), and correlation with an established global competency scale (κ = 0.75) were high. The most difficult items were "set up and adjust EBUS equipment" and "identify vascular anatomy (EBUS)." Feedback questionnaires from trainees (response rate, 80%) and surgeons (response rate, 100%) were consistently positive regarding user friendliness, utility as an assessment tool, and educational benefit. Participants believed the tool "facilitated communicating feedback to the trainee with specific areas to work on."
TCAT-IS is an effective tool for assessing competence in invasive staging and may enhance instruction. This initial test establishes early validity and reliability evidence, supporting the use of TCAT-IS in providing structured, specific, formative assessments of competency.
为了开发和评估一种用于侵袭性纵隔分期的外科学员能力评估工具,包括颈纵隔镜检查和支气管内超声(EBUS),我们使用专家审查和模拟以及临床试点测试开发了一种综合工具,即胸科能力评估工具-侵袭性分期(TCAT-IS)。
收集了有效性和可靠性证据,并进行了项目分析。最初,开发了一个 27 项的工具,该工具在 2014 年至 2015 年期间接受了加拿大胸外科医师协会(n = 86)成员的专家审查(响应率为 57%)。TCAT-IS 在 4 个能力领域(术前、一般手术、纵隔镜检查和 EBUS)中细化为 29 项。基于模拟使用进行了进一步的改进。然后,使用最终版本评估了 5 名进行侵袭性纵隔分期的胸科学员在活体患者中的能力。
参与者在 20 次纵隔镜检查和 8 次 EBUS 手术中进行了评估,共完成了 47 次评估。可靠性(Cronbach's alpha = 0.94)、评分者间可靠性(κ = 0.80)和与既定的整体能力量表的相关性(κ = 0.75)均很高。最困难的项目是“设置和调整 EBUS 设备”和“识别血管解剖结构(EBUS)”。学员(回应率 80%)和外科医生(回应率 100%)的反馈问卷一致认为该工具易于使用、对评估工具有用且具有教育意义。参与者认为该工具“有助于与学员沟通反馈,具体到需要改进的领域”。
TCAT-IS 是一种评估侵袭性分期能力的有效工具,并且可能增强教学效果。这项初步测试确立了早期的有效性和可靠性证据,支持使用 TCAT-IS 对能力进行结构化、具体和形成性评估。