Yalici-Armagan Basak, Ayanoglu Burcu Tugrul, Demirdag Hatice Gamze
a Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University , Ankara , Turkey.
b Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training and Research Hospital , Ankara , Turkey.
Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2019 Sep;38(3):261-266. doi: 10.1080/15569527.2019.1594874. Epub 2019 May 7.
Papulopustular rash is the most common cutaneous adverse effect during targeted tumour therapy particularly with epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFRIs). To evaluate the adverse skin reactions, mainly papulopustular rash, caused by targeted tumour therapy. We retrospectively analysed the data of patients who were diagnosed papulopustular rash due to targeted chemotherapeutic agents between January 2016 and August 2018. Demographic characteristics of the patients, the type of malignancy, chemotherapeutic agents causing papulopustular rash, clinical features and grade of the rash, treatment modalities used for the rash, other associated cutaneous adverse reactions, and the need for dose-modification or discontinuation of the chemotherapy were recorded. A total of 39 patients (26 males, 13 females) with a median age of 60 (range 32-86) years were included in the study. EGFRIs such as erlotinib, lapatinib, cetuximab, and panitumumab were the main drugs causing papulopustular rash in 2 (5.1%), 3 (7.6%), 18 (46.1%), and 13 (33.3%) patients, respectively. Imatinib, bevacizumab in combination with oxaliplatin, and everolimus in combination with exemestane and goserelin were responsible in three patients. The most commonly affected area was the face (87.1%) followed by the trunk (56.4%), scalp (25.6%), and extremities (23%). The rash was recorded as grade 1, 2, and 3 in 18, 13, and 6 of the patients, respectively. Grade 3 rash was lead to dose interruptions in 5 (12.8%) patients with subsequent reintroduction at a lower dose in 4 (10.2%) of them and discontinuation of the therapy in 1 (2.5%) patient. Pruritus, xerosis, paronychia, increased growth of the eyelashes, mucositis, hand-foot syndrome (HSF), and symmetrical drug-related intertriginous and flexural exanthema (SDRIFE) are other skin toxicities associated with the targeted tumour therapy. With the increasing use of targeted therapies, dermatologists are now confronted with extensive spectrum of skin toxicities. Therefore, it is critical for dermatologists to be aware of these toxicities so as to develop the best approach without discontinuation of cancer therapy.
丘疹脓疱性皮疹是靶向肿瘤治疗期间最常见的皮肤不良反应,尤其是在使用表皮生长因子受体抑制剂(EGFRIs)时。为了评估靶向肿瘤治疗引起的皮肤不良反应,主要是丘疹脓疱性皮疹。我们回顾性分析了2016年1月至2018年8月期间因靶向化疗药物被诊断为丘疹脓疱性皮疹的患者数据。记录了患者的人口统计学特征、恶性肿瘤类型、引起丘疹脓疱性皮疹的化疗药物、皮疹的临床特征和分级、用于治疗皮疹的方法、其他相关的皮肤不良反应,以及化疗剂量调整或停药的必要性。共有39例患者(男性26例,女性13例)纳入研究,中位年龄为60岁(范围32 - 86岁)。厄洛替尼、拉帕替尼、西妥昔单抗和帕尼单抗等EGFRIs分别是2例(5.1%)、3例(7.6%)、18例(46.1%)和13例(33.3%)患者发生丘疹脓疱性皮疹的主要药物。伊马替尼、贝伐单抗联合奥沙利铂以及依维莫司联合依西美坦和戈舍瑞林导致3例患者出现皮疹。最常受累的部位是面部(87.1%),其次是躯干(56.4%)、头皮(25.6%)和四肢(23%)。皮疹在18例、13例和6例患者中分别记录为1级、2级和3级。3级皮疹导致5例(12.8%)患者剂量中断,其中4例(10.2%)随后以较低剂量重新用药,1例(2.5%)患者停药。瘙痒、皮肤干燥、甲沟炎、睫毛生长增加、黏膜炎、手足综合征(HSF)以及对称性药物相关性间擦疹和屈侧疹(SDRIFE)是与靶向肿瘤治疗相关的其他皮肤毒性。随着靶向治疗的使用增加,皮肤科医生现在面临着广泛的皮肤毒性。因此,皮肤科医生了解这些毒性对于在不中断癌症治疗的情况下制定最佳治疗方法至关重要。