Suppr超能文献

成功老龄化与衰弱:一项系统综述。

Successful Aging and Frailty: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Rolfson Darryl

机构信息

Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2P4, Canada.

出版信息

Geriatrics (Basel). 2018 Nov 15;3(4):79. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics3040079.

Abstract

The terms successful aging (SA) and frailty appear to have much in common, both in terms of overlapping constructs and common challenges with consensus and operationalization. The aim of this review is to summarize existing literature that defines that relationship. Primary and secondary source articles that used either term in the title or abstract were systematically reviewed for relevance to the study objective. Of 61 articles that met these criteria, 30 were secondary source, and of these four were highly relevant. Four of the remaining 31 original research articles were selected, and the prevalence of frailty and SA in populations with different characteristics were described and compared. The same model of frailty was used in all primary studies, but definitions for successful aging were heterogeneous. The prevalence of frailty ranged from 11.8% to 44.0% and that of SA ranged from 10.4% to 47.2%. The definitions used for each, especially the extent of multidimensionality, appeared to reflect the degree of overlap between SA and frailty. Whether frailty and SA are part of the same or different constructs, there is a pressing need for an ordered taxonomy to advance research that translates into clinical practice.

摘要

成功老龄化(SA)和衰弱这两个术语似乎有很多共同之处,无论是在重叠的概念方面,还是在共识和可操作性方面面临的共同挑战。本综述的目的是总结界定这种关系的现有文献。对在标题或摘要中使用这两个术语之一的一级和二级来源文章进行系统综述,以确定其与研究目标的相关性。在符合这些标准的61篇文章中,30篇是二级来源文章,其中4篇高度相关。从其余31篇原创研究文章中选取了4篇,描述并比较了不同特征人群中衰弱和成功老龄化的患病率。所有主要研究都使用了相同的衰弱模型,但成功老龄化的定义各不相同。衰弱的患病率在11.8%至44.0%之间,成功老龄化的患病率在10.4%至47.2%之间。用于二者的定义,尤其是多维度的程度,似乎反映了成功老龄化和衰弱之间的重叠程度。无论衰弱和成功老龄化是同一概念的一部分还是不同的概念,都迫切需要一个有序的分类法来推进能够转化为临床实践的研究。

相似文献

1
Successful Aging and Frailty: A Systematic Review.
Geriatrics (Basel). 2018 Nov 15;3(4):79. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics3040079.
2
The identification of frailty: a systematic literature review.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011 Nov;59(11):2129-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03597.x. Epub 2011 Sep 21.
3
Operational definitions of successful aging: a systematic review.
Int Psychogeriatr. 2014 Mar;26(3):373-81. doi: 10.1017/S1041610213002287. Epub 2013 Dec 5.
5
Successful aging and frailty: mutually exclusive paradigms or two ends of a shared continuum?
Can Geriatr J. 2015 Mar 31;18(1):35-6. doi: 10.5770/cgj.18.131. eCollection 2015 Mar.
6
Physical Resilience in Older Adults: Systematic Review and Development of an Emerging Construct.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2016 Apr;71(4):489-95. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glv202. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
7
[Frequency of successful aging and frailty. Associated risk factors].
Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol. 2018 Jan-Feb;53(1):23-25. doi: 10.1016/j.regg.2017.05.011. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
8
Successful Aging and Frailty: Opposite Sides of the Same Coin?
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016 Sep 1;17(9):797-801. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.04.015. Epub 2016 May 25.
9
Successful aging: considering non-biomedical constructs.
Clin Interv Aging. 2016 Nov 11;11:1623-1630. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S117202. eCollection 2016.
10
Oral frailty dissected and conceptualized: A scoping review.
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2022 May-Jun;100:104653. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2022.104653. Epub 2022 Feb 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Circulating Cell-Free Mitochondrial DNA in Plasma of Individuals with Schizophrenia and Cognitive Deficit in Mexican Population.
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2024 Sep 21;20:1757-1765. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S460554. eCollection 2024.
3
Operationalisation of Successful Ageing in the Oral Health Context: A Citation Analysis.
Int Dent J. 2024 Oct;74(5):937-945. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2024.04.018. Epub 2024 May 18.
5
Identifying Frailty in Administrative Databases: A Narrative Review.
J Frailty Aging. 2024;13(2):179-183. doi: 10.14283/jfa.2024.18.
7
Perceived Social Support and Associated Factors Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults With Frailty and Pre-frailty in Hangzhou, China.
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 14;13:944293. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.944293. eCollection 2022.
10
Frailty Phenotype and Cause-Specific Mortality in the United States.
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2020 Sep 25;75(10):1935-1942. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glaa025.

本文引用的文献

1
Implementing Frailty Measures in the Canadian Healthcare System.
J Frailty Aging. 2018;7(4):208-216. doi: 10.14283/jfa.2018.29.
2
Identification and management of frailty in the primary care setting.
CMAJ. 2018 Sep 24;190(38):E1134-E1140. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.171509.
3
Frailty and Resilience as Outcome Measures in Clinical Trials and Geriatric Care: Are We Getting Any Closer?
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Aug;66(8):1451-1454. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15441. Epub 2018 Aug 9.
4
Health inequalities and inequities by age: Stability for the Health Utilities Index and divergence for the Frailty Index.
SSM Popul Health. 2018 Apr 25;5:17-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2018.04.002. eCollection 2018 Aug.
5
[Frequency of successful aging and frailty. Associated risk factors].
Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol. 2018 Jan-Feb;53(1):23-25. doi: 10.1016/j.regg.2017.05.011. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
6
Relationship between perceptions of ageing and frailty in English older adults.
Psychol Health Med. 2018 Apr;23(4):465-474. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2017.1349325. Epub 2017 Jul 4.
7
A Scoping Review of Frailty and Acute Care in Middle-Aged and Older Individuals with Recommendations for Future Research.
Can Geriatr J. 2017 Mar 31;20(1):22-37. doi: 10.5770/cgj.20.240. eCollection 2017 Mar.
9
Successful aging: considering non-biomedical constructs.
Clin Interv Aging. 2016 Nov 11;11:1623-1630. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S117202. eCollection 2016.
10
Health, frailty and disability after ninety: Results of an observational study in France.
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2016 Sep-Oct;66:166-75. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2016.06.002. Epub 2016 Jun 10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验