Rolfson Darryl
Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2P4, Canada.
Geriatrics (Basel). 2018 Nov 15;3(4):79. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics3040079.
The terms successful aging (SA) and frailty appear to have much in common, both in terms of overlapping constructs and common challenges with consensus and operationalization. The aim of this review is to summarize existing literature that defines that relationship. Primary and secondary source articles that used either term in the title or abstract were systematically reviewed for relevance to the study objective. Of 61 articles that met these criteria, 30 were secondary source, and of these four were highly relevant. Four of the remaining 31 original research articles were selected, and the prevalence of frailty and SA in populations with different characteristics were described and compared. The same model of frailty was used in all primary studies, but definitions for successful aging were heterogeneous. The prevalence of frailty ranged from 11.8% to 44.0% and that of SA ranged from 10.4% to 47.2%. The definitions used for each, especially the extent of multidimensionality, appeared to reflect the degree of overlap between SA and frailty. Whether frailty and SA are part of the same or different constructs, there is a pressing need for an ordered taxonomy to advance research that translates into clinical practice.
成功老龄化(SA)和衰弱这两个术语似乎有很多共同之处,无论是在重叠的概念方面,还是在共识和可操作性方面面临的共同挑战。本综述的目的是总结界定这种关系的现有文献。对在标题或摘要中使用这两个术语之一的一级和二级来源文章进行系统综述,以确定其与研究目标的相关性。在符合这些标准的61篇文章中,30篇是二级来源文章,其中4篇高度相关。从其余31篇原创研究文章中选取了4篇,描述并比较了不同特征人群中衰弱和成功老龄化的患病率。所有主要研究都使用了相同的衰弱模型,但成功老龄化的定义各不相同。衰弱的患病率在11.8%至44.0%之间,成功老龄化的患病率在10.4%至47.2%之间。用于二者的定义,尤其是多维度的程度,似乎反映了成功老龄化和衰弱之间的重叠程度。无论衰弱和成功老龄化是同一概念的一部分还是不同的概念,都迫切需要一个有序的分类法来推进能够转化为临床实践的研究。