Department of Sociology & Gerontology and Scripps Gerontology Center, Miami University, Oxford, OH, USA.
Division of Gerontology, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Maryland Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Aug 13;24(1):679. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05278-6.
Quality of life (QoL) is a subjective measure reflecting individuals' evaluations based on their personal goals and values. While global research shows the role of neighborhood factors like ethnic diversity and socio-cultural dynamics on QoL, these are unexplored in the Nepali context. Therefore, this study examined the relationship between neighborhood environment and QoL among Nepali older adults in eastern Nepal.
This cross-sectional study involved 847 non-institutionalized older adults (aged ≥ 60 years) from two districts in eastern Nepal. QoL was evaluated using the 13-item brief Older People's Quality of Life questionnaire, where a mean score of < 3 indicated low/poor QoL. The neighborhood environment, conceptualized across three domains (demographic, socio-cultural, and built environment), included ethnic diversity, connections with family, friends, and neighbors, cultural ties, residential stability, and rurality. Their association with QoL was examined using multivariable logistic regression.
Around 20% of older adults reported poor QoL. Higher ethnic diversity (adjusted Odds Ratio [aOR] = 0.12, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.04-0.36), moderate contact with family and relatives (aOR = 0.26, CI: 0.11-0.61), and high contact with neighbors (aOR = 0.09, CI: 0.03-0.21) were associated with lower odds of poor QoL. Conversely, high contact with friends (aOR = 2.29, CI: 1.30-4.04) and unstable residence (OR = 6.25, CI: 2.03-19.23) increased the odds of poor QoL. Additionally, among the covariates, chronic disease, tobacco use, unemployment, and lack of education were also significantly associated with poor QoL.
Overall, the demographic environment, socio-cultural factors, and the built environment of the neighborhood influence QoL. Therefore, diversifying the neighborhood's ethnic composition, promoting social connections such as frequent contact with family, relatives, and neighbors, and ensuring residential stability can enhance the QoL of older adults.
生活质量(QoL)是一种主观衡量标准,反映了个人基于其个人目标和价值观的评价。虽然全球研究表明邻里因素(如种族多样性和社会文化动态)对 QoL 有影响,但这些因素在尼泊尔的背景下尚未得到探索。因此,本研究旨在检验尼泊尔东部老年人群体中邻里环境与生活质量之间的关系。
本横断面研究涉及尼泊尔东部两个地区的 847 名非机构化老年人(年龄≥60 岁)。使用 13 项简短老年人生活质量问卷评估生活质量,其中<3 分表示生活质量低/差。邻里环境从三个方面(人口统计学、社会文化和建筑环境)进行概念化,包括种族多样性、与家人、朋友和邻居的联系、文化联系、居住稳定性和农村性。使用多变量逻辑回归分析其与生活质量的关联。
约 20%的老年人报告生活质量差。较高的种族多样性(调整后的优势比[aOR] = 0.12,95%置信区间[CI]:0.04-0.36)、与家人和亲戚适度接触(aOR = 0.26,CI:0.11-0.61)以及与邻居高度接触(aOR = 0.09,CI:0.03-0.21)与较低的生活质量差的可能性相关。相反,与朋友的高接触(aOR = 2.29,CI:1.30-4.04)和不稳定的居住(OR = 6.25,CI:2.03-19.23)增加了生活质量差的可能性。此外,在协变量中,慢性疾病、吸烟、失业和缺乏教育也与生活质量差显著相关。
总体而言,邻里环境的人口统计学环境、社会文化因素和建筑环境会影响生活质量。因此,使邻里的种族构成多样化、促进社会联系(如经常与家人、亲戚和邻居接触)并确保居住稳定可以提高老年人的生活质量。