Suppr超能文献

在大型医疗机构和学术中心接受治疗的局部晚期胰腺癌患者的治疗策略及临床结局。

Treatment strategies and clinical outcomes of locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients treated at high-volume facilities and academic centers.

作者信息

David John M, Kim Sungjin, Placencio-Hickok Veronica R, Torosian Arman, Hendifar Andrew, Tuli Richard

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.

Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.

出版信息

Adv Radiat Oncol. 2018 Nov 9;4(2):302-313. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2018.10.006. eCollection 2019 Apr-Jun.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) treatment has varying practice patterns with poor outcomes. We investigated treatment using single-agent chemotherapy and multiagent chemotherapy (MAC) with or without radiation therapy (RT) at high-volume facilities (HVFs) and academic centers (ACs).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The National Cancer Database was used to obtain data on 10,139 patients with LAPC. HVF was defined as the top 5% of facilities per number of patients treated at each facility. Univariate and multivariable (MVA) analysis Cox regressions were performed to identify the impact of HVF, AC, MAC, and RT on overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

The median age of patients was 66 years (range, 22-90); 50.1% were male and 49.9% female. Of the patients, 46.1% received MAC, 53.8% received single-agent chemotherapy, 45.7% received RT, 54.3% did not receive RT, and 5% underwent surgical resection. The median follow-up was 48.8 months. On MVA, treatment at HVFs and ACs remained significantly associated with improved OS, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.84 ( < .001) and 0.94 ( = .004), respectively. The median OS for HVF treatment compared with low-volume facilities was 14.3 versus 11.2 months, respectively ( < .001). The median OS for AC treatment versus non-AC was 12.1 versus 10.8 months, respectively ( < .001). Additionally, on MVA, receipt of RT and MAC remained significantly associated with improved OS (HR: 0.76;  < .001; and HR: 0.73;  < .001, respectively). MVA for receipt of surgery showed that MAC is a significant predictor for receiving surgery (odds ratio: 1.29;  = .009).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results build on a growing literature supporting RT and MAC in treating LAPC. Additionally, we believe that-in the absence of prospective data-this makes a strong case for considering MAC with RT at ACs and HVFs for treating LAPC.

摘要

目的

局部晚期胰腺癌(LAPC)的治疗方式各异,预后较差。我们调查了在高容量医疗机构(HVF)和学术中心(AC)使用单药化疗和多药化疗(MAC)联合或不联合放射治疗(RT)的治疗情况。

方法和材料

利用国家癌症数据库获取10139例LAPC患者的数据。HVF定义为每个机构治疗患者数量排名前5%的机构。进行单因素和多因素(MVA)分析的Cox回归,以确定HVF、AC、MAC和RT对总生存期(OS)的影响。

结果

患者的中位年龄为66岁(范围22 - 90岁);50.1%为男性。患者中,46.1%接受MAC,53.8%接受单药化疗,45.7%接受RT,54.3%未接受RT,5%接受了手术切除。中位随访时间为48.8个月。在MVA中,HVF和AC的治疗仍与OS改善显著相关,风险比(HR)分别为0.84(P <.001)和0.94(P =.004)。与低容量机构相比,HVF治疗的中位OS分别为14.3个月和低容量机构的11.2个月(P <.001)。AC治疗与非AC治疗的中位OS分别为12.1个月和10.8个月(P <.001)。此外,在MVA中,接受RT和MAC仍与OS改善显著相关(HR分别为:0.76;P <.001;和HR:0.73;P <.001)。接受手术的MVA显示,MAC是接受手术的显著预测因素(优势比:1.29;P =.009)。

结论

我们的结果建立在越来越多支持RT和MAC治疗LAPC的文献基础上。此外,我们认为,在缺乏前瞻性数据的情况下,这有力地支持了在AC和HVF考虑MAC联合RT治疗LAPC。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1250/6460104/bb2374e8fb38/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验