Suppr超能文献

局限性前列腺癌治疗的地区差异:美国手术和放疗利用情况分析

Regional Differences in the Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer: An Analysis of Surgery and Radiation Utilization in the United States.

作者信息

Scherzer Nickolas D, DiBiase Zachary S, Srivastav Sudesh K, Thomas Raju, DiBiase Steven J

机构信息

Department of Urology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana.

Webb School of Knoxville, Knoxville, Tennessee.

出版信息

Adv Radiat Oncol. 2019 Jan 23;4(2):331-336. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2019.01.004. eCollection 2019 Apr-Jun.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Men with localized prostate cancer have various treatment options available in their management. The optimal approach is controversial and can be influenced by multiple factors. This study aimed to investigate the influence of geographic region on the selection of treatment for prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Using the National Cancer Database, we identified men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer between 2010 and 2014. The United States was divided into 11 regions per the American Cancer Society Divisions. The first course of treatment was recorded as radiation therapy (RT), radical prostatectomy (RP), or active surveillance (AS). The RT subgroup consisted of patients receiving all forms of RT, including external beam and brachytherapy, or RT plus androgen deprivation therapy. The RP subgroup consisted of patients receiving RP alone or combined with RT or androgen deprivation therapy. A χ test was performed to assess the association between region and frequency of RT and RP.

RESULTS

This study included 462,811 men with localized prostate cancer who were treated in the United States, of whom 63.46% underwent RP, 31.54% underwent RT, and 5.00% underwent AS. Significant regional differences in RP and RT were observed ( ≤ .0001). RP was used most commonly in the Midwest (75.07%) and High Plains (73.37%) regions, whereas RP was least used in the South Atlantic (59.04%) region. Similarly, RT was used most commonly in South Atlantic (40.96%) and New England (38.98%) regions and least commonly in the Midwest (24.93%) region. AS was used most in the New England (7.27%) and Midwest (6.8%) regions and least used in the High Plains (2.57%) and Mid-South (2.84%) regions.

CONCLUSIONS

Regional differences exist in the United States with regard to the definitive treatment of localized prostate cancer. The etiology for these regional differences is likely multifactorial.

摘要

目的

局限性前列腺癌男性患者在治疗管理中有多种选择。最佳治疗方法存在争议,且会受到多种因素影响。本研究旨在调查地理区域对前列腺癌治疗选择的影响。

方法与材料

利用国家癌症数据库,我们确定了2010年至2014年间被诊断为局限性前列腺癌的男性患者。根据美国癌症协会分区,美国被划分为11个区域。首次治疗记录为放射治疗(RT)、根治性前列腺切除术(RP)或主动监测(AS)。RT亚组包括接受所有形式放疗的患者,包括外照射和近距离放疗,或放疗加雄激素剥夺治疗。RP亚组包括单独接受RP或联合放疗或雄激素剥夺治疗的患者。进行χ检验以评估区域与RT和RP频率之间的关联。

结果

本研究纳入了462,811名在美国接受治疗的局限性前列腺癌男性患者,其中63.46%接受了RP,31.54%接受了RT,5.00%接受了AS。观察到RP和RT存在显著的区域差异(≤.0001)。RP在中西部(75.07%)和高平原(73.37%)地区使用最为普遍,而在南大西洋(59.04%)地区使用最少。同样,RT在南大西洋(40.96%)和新英格兰(38.98%)地区使用最为普遍,在中西部(24.93%)地区使用最少。AS在新英格兰(7.27%)和中西部(6.8%)地区使用最多,在高平原(2.57%)和中南(2.84%)地区使用最少。

结论

在美国,局限性前列腺癌的确定性治疗存在区域差异。这些区域差异的病因可能是多因素的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d14a/6460229/05f0f6176faf/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Regional Differences in the Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer: An Analysis of Surgery and Radiation Utilization in the United States.
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2019 Jan 23;4(2):331-336. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2019.01.004. eCollection 2019 Apr-Jun.
2
7
Utilization of multimodality therapy with primary radical prostatectomy versus radiation therapy for Gleason 8-10 prostate cancer.
Brachytherapy. 2021 Jan-Feb;20(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2020.09.005. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
8
Sexual function with localized prostate cancer: active surveillance vs radical therapy.
BJU Int. 2012 Oct;110(7):1032-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10846.x. Epub 2012 Jan 19.
10
Radical prostatectomy vs radiation therapy and androgen-suppression therapy in high-risk prostate cancer.
BJU Int. 2012 Oct;110(8):1116-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11012.x. Epub 2012 Apr 30.

引用本文的文献

2
Cryotherapy versus radical prostatectomy as a salvage treatment for radio-recurrent prostate cancer.
World J Urol. 2024 Sep 11;42(1):515. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05199-4.
6
Impact of centralization of prostate cancer services on the choice of radical treatment.
BJU Int. 2023 Jan;131(1):53-62. doi: 10.1111/bju.15830. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
8
Influence of Geography on Prostate Cancer Treatment.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021 Apr 1;109(5):1286-1295. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.11.055. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
9
A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Local Salvage Therapies After Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer (MASTER).
Eur Urol. 2021 Sep;80(3):280-292. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.11.010. Epub 2020 Dec 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Identification of men with low-risk biopsy-confirmed prostate cancer as candidates for active surveillance.
Urol Oncol. 2018 Jun;36(6):310.e7-310.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.03.011. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
3
National Comprehensive Cancer Network® Favorable Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer-Is Active Surveillance Appropriate?
J Urol. 2018 May;199(5):1196-1201. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.12.049. Epub 2017 Dec 26.
4
Trends in active surveillance for very low-risk prostate cancer: do guidelines influence modern practice?
Cancer Med. 2017 Oct;6(10):2410-2418. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1132. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
5
Domestic Job Shortage or Job Maldistribution? A Geographic Analysis of the Current Radiation Oncology Job Market.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Sep 1;99(1):9-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.04.016. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
7
10-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer.
N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 13;375(15):1415-1424. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1606220. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
8
Association Between Travel Distance and Choice of Treatment for Prostate Cancer: Does Geography Reduce Patient Choice?
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Oct 1;96(2):313-317. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.05.022. Epub 2016 May 27.
9
Active surveillance for prostate cancer: current evidence and contemporary state of practice.
Nat Rev Urol. 2016 Apr;13(4):205-15. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2016.45. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
10
Prevalence of Prostate Cancer Clinical States and Mortality in the United States: Estimates Using a Dynamic Progression Model.
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 13;10(10):e0139440. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139440. eCollection 2015.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验