• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头颈部癌症患者的临终成本和临终关怀利用。

End-of-Life Costs and Hospice Utilization in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer.

机构信息

1 Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.

出版信息

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Sep;161(3):439-441. doi: 10.1177/0194599819846072. Epub 2019 Apr 23.

DOI:10.1177/0194599819846072
PMID:31013209
Abstract

The Quality Oncology Practice Initiative has several metrics related to end-of life (EOL) care, including hospice enrollment ≤3 days, with lower scores signaling better performance. Of privately insured patients with head and neck cancer, 3.5% were enrolled in hospice prior to death and 21.3% spent ≤3 days in hospice, indicating aggressive EOL care. Patients with late hospice enrollment had higher spending in the last 30 days of life (DOL). Patients in hospice ≤3 days spent $37,426, while those in hospice >3 days spent $24,418 ( = .002). The largest portion of this difference was attributable to inpatient services. Patients in hospice ≤3 days spent $22,089 on inpatient services in the last 30 DOL, while those in hospice >3 days spent $8361 ( < .001). Further research is needed to determine if more high-value care can be provided with earlier hospice enrollment and to ensure that goal concordance is included in defining high-value care.

摘要

质量肿瘤实践倡议(Quality Oncology Practice Initiative)有几个与临终关怀相关的指标,包括临终关怀入院≤3 天,分数越低表示表现越好。在私人保险的头颈部癌症患者中,有 3.5%在死前入临终关怀,有 21.3%在临终关怀中≤3 天,表明临终关怀积极。临终关怀入院较晚的患者在生命的最后 30 天(DOL)的花费更高。临终关怀≤3 天的患者在最后 30 天 DOL 的住院费用为 37426 美元,而临终关怀>3 天的患者为 24418 美元(=0.002)。造成这种差异的最大部分归因于住院服务。临终关怀≤3 天的患者在生命的最后 30 天 DOL 中花费 22089 美元用于住院服务,而临终关怀>3 天的患者花费 8361 美元(<0.001)。需要进一步研究以确定是否可以通过更早地入临终关怀来提供更多高价值的护理,并确保目标一致性包括在定义高价值护理中。

相似文献

1
End-of-Life Costs and Hospice Utilization in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer.头颈部癌症患者的临终成本和临终关怀利用。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Sep;161(3):439-441. doi: 10.1177/0194599819846072. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
2
End-of-Life Practice Patterns in Head and Neck Cancer.头颈部癌症的临终关怀实践模式。
Laryngoscope. 2021 Aug;131(8):1769-1773. doi: 10.1002/lary.29423. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
3
Resource utilization for ovarian cancer patients at the end of life: how much is too much?卵巢癌患者临终时的资源利用:多少才算过度?
Gynecol Oncol. 2005 Nov;99(2):261-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.07.102. Epub 2005 Sep 2.
4
Medical care utilization and costs on end-of-life cancer patients: The role of hospice care.临终癌症患者的医疗服务利用情况及费用:临终关怀的作用。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Nov;95(44):e5216. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005216.
5
Health care costs for patients with cancer at the end of life.终末期癌症患者的医疗保健费用。
J Oncol Pract. 2012 Nov;8(6):75s-80s. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2011.000469. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
6
Reducing costs at the end of life through provider incentives for hospice care: A retrospective cohort study.通过为临终关怀提供激励来降低成本:回顾性队列研究。
Palliat Med. 2018 Sep;32(8):1389-1400. doi: 10.1177/0269216318774899. Epub 2018 May 25.
7
Aggressive end-of-life care significantly influenced propensity for hospice enrollment within the last three days of life for Taiwanese cancer decedents.积极的临终关怀对台湾癌症死者生命最后三天内进入临终关怀机构的倾向有显著影响。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011 Jan;41(1):68-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.04.018.
8
The Cost of Hospice Services in Terminally Ill Patients With Head and Neck Cancer.晚期头颈癌患者临终关怀服务的成本
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Dec;141(12):1066-74. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2015.2162.
9
Association Between Hospice Length of Stay, Health Care Utilization, and Medicare Costs at the End of Life Among Patients Who Received Maintenance Hemodialysis.接受维持性血液透析患者临终时的临终关怀入住时间、医疗保健利用与医疗保险费用之间的关系。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Jun 1;178(6):792-799. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.0256.
10
The earlier the better: the role of palliative care consultation on aggressive end of life care, hospice utilization, and advance care planning documentation among gynecologic oncology patients.尽早咨询:姑息治疗咨询在妇科肿瘤患者积极的临终关怀、临终关怀利用和预先护理计划文件方面的作用。
Support Care Cancer. 2019 May;27(5):1927-1934. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4457-x. Epub 2018 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Integration of Palliative Care as a Part of the Multidisciplinary Management of Patients with Head and Neck Cancer.将姑息治疗整合作为头颈癌患者多学科管理的一部分。
Oncol Ther. 2025 Jul 23. doi: 10.1007/s40487-025-00363-1.
2
Non-curative care options for patients with advanced-stage head and neck cancer: Current state of the science and future opportunities.晚期头颈癌患者的非治愈性护理选择:科学现状与未来机遇
Palliat Support Care. 2025 Feb 17;23:e59. doi: 10.1017/S1478951524002049.
3
Impact of monoclonal antibody therapy for head and neck cancer on end-of-life care utilization and costs.
头颈部癌症的单克隆抗体治疗对生命终末期护理利用和成本的影响。
Head Neck. 2023 Jun;45(6):1468-1475. doi: 10.1002/hed.27359. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
4
Referral Patterns of Outpatient Palliative Care among the Head and Neck Cancer Population.头颈部癌症患者门诊姑息治疗的转诊模式
Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Jan 27;26(4):e538-e547. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1741436. eCollection 2022 Oct.