• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿科危重症随机对照试验中统计学显著结果的脆弱性。

The Fragility of Statistically Significant Findings in Pediatric Critical Care Randomized Controlled Trials.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Section of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, The University of Chicago Medicine and Comer Children's Hospital, Chicago, IL.

Center for Healthcare Delivery Science and Innovation, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL.

出版信息

Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019 Jun;20(6):e258-e262. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001922.

DOI:10.1097/PCC.0000000000001922
PMID:31013262
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The Fragility Index measures the number of events on which the statistical significance of a result depends and has been suggested as an adjunct statistical assessment for interpretation of trial results. This study aimed to assess the robustness of statistically significant results from pediatric critical care randomized controlled trials with dichotomous outcomes.

DATA SOURCES

A previously published scoping review of pediatric critical care randomized controlled trials (www.PICUtrials.net).

STUDY SELECTION

A total of 342 trials were screened for inclusion. After applying inclusion/exclusion criteria, 43 fulfilled eligibility criteria and were included in the analysis.

DATA EXTRACTION

Calculation of Fragility Index for trials reporting a statistically significant dichotomous outcome, and analysis of the relationship between trial characteristics and Fragility Index.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The median Fragility Index was 2 (interquartile range, 1-6). The median sample size was 98 (interquartile range, 50-148) and sample size demonstrated a strong correlation with the Fragility Index (r = 0.729; n = 43; p < 0.001). The median number of outcome events was 8 (interquartile range, 4-15) and the total number of outcome events also showed a strong correlation with the Fragility Index (r = 0.728; n = 43; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Results from pediatric critical care randomized controlled trials with dichotomous outcomes reporting statistically significant findings often hinge on a small number of outcome events. Clinicians should exercise caution when interpreting results of trials with a low Fragility Index.

摘要

目的

脆弱指数衡量结果的统计学意义所依赖的事件数量,并已被提议作为解释试验结果的辅助统计评估。本研究旨在评估具有二分类结局的儿科重症监护随机对照试验中统计学显著结果的稳健性。

数据来源

先前发表的儿科重症监护随机对照试验的范围综述(www.PICUtrials.net)。

研究选择

共筛选了 342 项试验以纳入。在应用纳入/排除标准后,有 43 项符合纳入标准并纳入分析。

数据提取

计算报告统计学显著二分类结局的试验的脆弱指数,并分析试验特征与脆弱指数之间的关系。

数据综合

脆弱指数的中位数为 2(四分位距,1-6)。中位数样本量为 98(四分位距,50-148),样本量与脆弱指数呈强相关性(r = 0.729;n = 43;p < 0.001)。结局事件的中位数数量为 8(四分位距,4-15),总结局事件数也与脆弱指数呈强相关性(r = 0.728;n = 43;p < 0.001)。

结论

具有统计学显著发现的二分类结局的儿科重症监护随机对照试验的结果往往取决于少数几个结局事件。当解释脆弱指数较低的试验结果时,临床医生应谨慎行事。

相似文献

1
The Fragility of Statistically Significant Findings in Pediatric Critical Care Randomized Controlled Trials.儿科危重症随机对照试验中统计学显著结果的脆弱性。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2019 Jun;20(6):e258-e262. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001922.
2
The Fragility Index in Multicenter Randomized Controlled Critical Care Trials.多中心随机对照重症监护试验中的脆弱性指数
Crit Care Med. 2016 Jul;44(7):1278-84. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001670.
3
The Fragility and Reliability of Conclusions of Anesthesia and Critical Care Randomized Trials With Statistically Significant Findings: A Systematic Review.具有统计学意义的麻醉和重症监护随机试验结论的脆弱性和可靠性:系统评价。
Crit Care Med. 2019 Mar;47(3):456-462. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003527.
4
The fragility of statistically significant findings from randomized trials in spine surgery: a systematic survey.脊柱手术随机试验中具有统计学意义的研究结果的脆弱性:一项系统调查。
Spine J. 2015 Oct 1;15(10):2188-97. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.06.004. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
5
The Fragility Index in a Cohort of Pediatric Randomized Controlled Trials.一组儿科随机对照试验中的脆弱性指数
J Clin Med. 2017 Aug 14;6(8):79. doi: 10.3390/jcm6080079.
6
The Results of Randomized Controlled Trials in Emergency Medicine Are Frequently Fragile.随机对照试验在急诊医学中的结果往往是脆弱的。
Ann Emerg Med. 2019 Jun;73(6):565-576. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.10.037. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
7
The Fragility of Statistically Significant Randomized Controlled Trials in Plastic Surgery.整形外科中统计学显著的随机对照试验的脆弱性。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Nov;144(5):1238-1245. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006102.
8
The Fragility of Statistically Significant Findings From Randomized Trials in Sports Surgery: A Systematic Survey.运动外科随机试验中具有统计学意义结果的脆弱性:一项系统调查。
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Jul;45(9):2164-2170. doi: 10.1177/0363546516674469. Epub 2016 Dec 14.
9
The Fragility of Statistically Significant Results in Pediatric Orthopaedic Randomized Controlled Trials as Quantified by the Fragility Index: A Systematic Review.通过脆弱性指数量化的儿科骨科随机对照试验中具有统计学意义结果的脆弱性:一项系统评价
J Pediatr Orthop. 2018 Sep;38(8):e418-e423. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001201.
10
Fragility of Results in Ophthalmology Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review.眼科随机对照试验结果的脆弱性:系统评价。
Ophthalmology. 2018 May;125(5):642-648. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.11.015. Epub 2017 Dec 11.

引用本文的文献

1
The Fragility of Statistical Findings in Meniscus Repair Literature: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.半月板修复文献中统计结果的脆弱性:随机对照试验的系统评价
Iowa Orthop J. 2024;44(2):126-132.
2
Statistical Fragility of Findings From Randomized Phase 3 Trials in Pediatric Oncology.儿科肿瘤学随机3期试验结果的统计脆弱性
Cancer Med. 2024 Dec;13(24):e70356. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70356.
3
Fragility of statistically significant findings from randomized clinical trials of surgical treatment of humeral shaft fractures: A systematic review.
肱骨干骨折手术治疗随机临床试验中具有统计学意义结果的脆弱性:一项系统评价。
World J Orthop. 2022 Sep 18;13(9):825-836. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v13.i9.825.
4
Statistical Fragility of Single-Row Versus Double-Row Anchoring for Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review of Comparative Studies.肩袖修复中单排与双排锚定的统计学脆弱性:比较研究的系统评价
Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 May 10;10(5):23259671221093391. doi: 10.1177/23259671221093391. eCollection 2022 May.
5
Paediatric surgical trials, their fragility index, and why to avoid using it to evaluate results.儿科外科试验、脆弱指数及其为何应避免用于评估结果
Pediatr Surg Int. 2022 Jul;38(7):1057-1066. doi: 10.1007/s00383-022-05133-y. Epub 2022 May 7.
6
The Statistical Fragility of Single-Bundle vs Double-Bundle Autografts for ACL Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Comparative Studies.前交叉韧带重建中单束与双束自体移植物的统计学脆弱性:比较研究的系统评价
Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Dec 20;9(12):23259671211064626. doi: 10.1177/23259671211064626. eCollection 2021 Dec.
7
Reverse Bayesian Implications of p-Values Reported in Critical Care Randomized Trials.重症监护随机试验中报告的 p 值的反向贝叶斯推论。
J Intensive Care Med. 2022 Jul;37(7):954-964. doi: 10.1177/08850666211053793. Epub 2021 Nov 29.
8
The Fragility of Statistical Findings in Achilles Tendon Injury Research: A Systematic Review.跟腱损伤研究中统计结果的脆弱性:系统评价。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2021 Sep 2;5(9):e21.00018. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00018.
9
Fragility of randomized trials supporting cancer drug approvals stratified by approval pathway and review designations.支持癌症药物获批的随机试验的脆弱性,按获批途径和审评指定进行分层。
Cancer Med. 2021 Aug;10(16):5405-5414. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4029. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
10
How Robust are the Evidences that Formulate Surviving Sepsis Guidelines? An Analysis of Fragility and Reverse Fragility of Randomized Controlled Trials that were Referred in these Guidelines.制定脓毒症存活指南的证据有多可靠?对这些指南中引用的随机对照试验的脆弱性和反脆弱性分析。
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2021 Jul;25(7):773-779. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23895.