Suppr超能文献

阿根廷及其他地区国家运动马匹寄生虫控制情况调查

A survey on parasite control in sport horses of Argentina and other regional countries.

作者信息

Losinno S J, Aguilar J, Carbonetti L, Ferniot E, San Esteban F, Flores Suares C M

机构信息

Depto. de Clínica Animal, Facultad de Agronomía y Veterinaria, Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto, Córdoba, Argentina.

Depto. de Clínica Animal, Facultad de Agronomía y Veterinaria, Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto, Córdoba, Argentina.

出版信息

Vet Parasitol Reg Stud Reports. 2018 Aug;13:74-78. doi: 10.1016/j.vprsr.2018.04.004. Epub 2018 Apr 16.

Abstract

Strategies for parasite control have undergone major changes in recent years, especially in Europe and the United States, replacing traditional approaches by schemes based on surveillance and selective therapy. A first step in helminth control planning is to understand and demonstrate how horse owners or trainers currently control nematodes. The aim of this study was to collect information, through a survey, about important aspects of routine anthelmintic strategies in sport horses in Argentina and other regional countries. A total of 100 surveys were sent. Sixty nine were responded, 53% of the surveys were answered by veterinarians and 47% by managers. The majority of the respondents (58%) worked in Thoroughbred studs, followed by Throroughbred farms (23%), Horse Riding Centers (10%) and other types of centers (9%). Most respondents treated horses at fixed time every 3 months (48%). Twenty-two percent of them did it at fixed time every 6 months, 16% at fixed time every 4 months and 6% at fixed time every 12 months; 6% dewormed on individual basis while 4% did not treat at all; 2% dewormed every two months. When asked about the rationale for deworming, the majority (41%) did so based on the time elapsed since the last treatment, followed by the time of the year (22%), according to the age of the animals (15%), according to previous diagnosis (12%), 9% treated for no particular reason and 1% when the horses reached the stud. Almost half of respondents (48%) did not rotate anthelmintic drug on. In a smaller proportion, others did it every 3 months (26%), every 12 months (11%), every 6 months (9%) and finally every 4 months (6%). Half of the respondents (50%) treated horses 4 times a year, 32% did 2 times a year, 15% 3 times and 3% did not deworm at all. Regarding making a diagnosis prior to treatment, 76% of the respondents answered negatively, while 24% did so. Only 20% of respondents performed the anthelmintic efficacy test. It can be concluded that there is little participation and planning of the veterinary professional regarding the control of internal parasites in horses of Argentina. Performing coprologic tests are practices not usual in our region. Practices of parasite management seem to be reduced almost exclusively to the administration of anthelmintic drugs at fixed times, often indiscriminately.

摘要

近年来,寄生虫控制策略发生了重大变化,尤其是在欧洲和美国,基于监测和选择性治疗的方案取代了传统方法。蠕虫控制规划的第一步是了解并展示马主或驯马师目前如何控制线虫。本研究的目的是通过一项调查收集有关阿根廷及其他地区国家运动马常规驱虫策略重要方面的信息。共发放了100份调查问卷。收到了69份回复,其中53%的调查问卷由兽医回答,47%由管理人员回答。大多数受访者(58%)在纯种马繁育场工作,其次是纯种马场(23%)、马术中心(10%)和其他类型的中心(9%)。大多数受访者(48%)每3个月定期给马驱虫一次。其中22%的人每6个月定期驱虫一次,16%的人每4个月定期驱虫一次,6%的人每12个月定期驱虫一次;6%的人根据个体情况驱虫,而4%的人根本不进行治疗;2%的人每两个月驱虫一次。当被问及驱虫的理由时,大多数人(41%)是根据自上次治疗以来经过的时间进行驱虫,其次是根据一年中的时间(22%)、根据动物的年龄(15%)、根据先前的诊断(12%),9%的人没有特别原因就进行治疗,1%的人在马到达繁育场时进行治疗。几乎一半的受访者(48%)没有轮换使用驱虫药。较小比例的其他人每3个月轮换一次(26%)、每12个月轮换一次(11%)、每6个月轮换一次(9%),最后每4个月轮换一次(6%)。一半的受访者(50%)每年给马驱虫4次,32%的人每年驱虫2次,15%的人每年驱虫3次,3%的人根本不驱虫。关于在治疗前进行诊断,76%的受访者回答否,而24%的人回答是。只有20%的受访者进行了驱虫效果测试。可以得出结论,在阿根廷马匹体内寄生虫控制方面,兽医专业人员的参与和规划很少。进行粪便检查在我们地区不是常见的做法。寄生虫管理做法似乎几乎完全局限于定期使用驱虫药,而且往往是不加区分地使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验