Moredun Research Institute, Pentlands Science Park, Midlothian, EP26 0PZ, UK.
Equine Vet J. 2012 Jul;44(4):466-71. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2011.00493.x. Epub 2011 Nov 2.
Improved education of veterinarians and equine owners/managers is essential in implementing parasite control strategies that are less reliant on chemicals.
This questionnaire study, conducted on 61 UK Thoroughbred (TB) establishments during 2009 and 2010, was designed to obtain an understanding of current helminth control practices on studs. To our knowledge, this is the first occasion that statements obtained from TB studs via questionnaire have been supported by statistical analysis.
Despite many respondents indicating high levels of concern regarding anthelmintic resistance, 56% of these establishments that received visiting equines co-grazed these animals with permanent stock and <74% administered anthelmintics prior to integration. In the 12 months preceding the study, most respondents administered frequent macrocyclic lactone (ML) treatments, with none appearing to leave any animals in groups untreated at each administration. Indiscriminate whole group treatments with MLs and movement of animals to 'clean grazing' post treatment (reported by >25% of respondents), indicates that many stud owners/managers are not aware of the strong risk factors for the development of anthelmintic resistance. Few studs had conducted faecal egg count (FEC) analysis in the past and only 22% indicated that they considered this form of analysis beneficial in determining anthelmintic choice.
The challenge now is to convince stud owners/managers to deviate from their current practices to control strategies that are more likely to preserve anthelmintic efficacy. Veterinarians need to get more involved in implementing these control strategies, with better emphasis placed on the role of diagnostic tests in facilitating targeted treatments and in investigating anthelmintic sensitivity in the associated nematode populations.
改进兽医和马主/管理人员的教育对于实施依赖化学物质较少的寄生虫控制策略至关重要。
本问卷调查研究于 2009 年至 2010 年在英国 61 个纯种马(TB)马场进行,旨在了解种马场当前的驱虫控制实践。据我们所知,这是首次通过问卷调查从 TB 种马场获得的陈述得到了统计分析的支持。
尽管许多受访者表示对驱虫剂耐药性高度关注,但仍有 56%的种马场在接待来访的马匹时与永久性牲畜共同放牧,且在整合前不到 74%的种马场给动物使用驱虫剂。在研究前的 12 个月内,大多数受访者频繁使用大环内酯类驱虫药(ML)进行治疗,但似乎没有在每次给药时让任何动物未接受治疗。对 ML 进行无差别全群治疗,以及在治疗后将动物转移到“清洁放牧”(>25%的受访者报告),表明许多种马场主/管理人员没有意识到发展驱虫剂耐药性的强烈风险因素。很少有马场过去进行过粪便虫卵计数(FEC)分析,只有 22%的马场表示他们认为这种分析有助于确定驱虫剂的选择。
现在的挑战是说服种马场主/管理人员改变当前的做法,转而采用更有可能保留驱虫效果的控制策略。兽医需要更多地参与实施这些控制策略,更加强调诊断测试在促进针对性治疗以及调查相关线虫种群的驱虫剂敏感性方面的作用。