Raber Andrew, Kula Katherine, Ghoneima Ahmed
Indiana University School Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics and Oral Facial Genetics, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Indiana University School Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics and Oral Facial Genetics, Indianapolis, IN, USA; Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences (MBRU), Hamdan Bin Mohammed College of Dental Medicine, Department of Orthodontic, Dubai, United Arab Emirates; Al-Azhar University, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Department of Orthodontics, Cairo, Egypt.
Int Orthod. 2019 Jun;17(2):287-295. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2019.03.011. Epub 2019 Apr 20.
The purpose of this study was to investigate differences in the thickness of the labial bone overlying the maxillary and mandibular incisors in class I, II, and III skeletal classifications using three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomographs (CBCT) technology.
Pretreatment CBCTs of 54 Caucasian subjects (44 males, 10 females) were collected from the archives of a graduate orthodontic clinic. The subjects were divided into three groups based on their skeletal classification. CBCT scans were oriented to the long axis of each maxillary and mandibular incisor from the root apex to incisal tip and the axial inclination of each incisor was measured and recorded. Labial bone thickness was measured at the apex (A) and at the midpoint (MP) on each maxillary and mandibular incisor. A linear measurement, perpendicular to the long axis, was recorded from the labial bone surface to the most anterior root surface at two points. The effects of skeletal classification, jaw, incisor position, and side on A, MP, and Inclination were evaluated using mixed-model ANOVA. A 5% significance level was used for all tests.
Significantly greater bone thickness at the apex and midpoint was reported in class III individuals than class I or II. Central incisors had significantly greater bone thickness at both the root apex and midpoint. Significantly greater bone thickness was noted in the mandible at the level of the apex. At the level of the midpoint, significantly greater thickness was reported in the maxilla. There was a positive correlation between thickness and angle within each jaw-incisor combination for class I patients and for central incisors in class III patients.
The thickness of labial alveolar bone over the incisors varies based on the underlying skeletal discrepancy in each patient. Skeletal discrepancy influences the inclination of the maxillary and mandibular incisors.
本研究旨在利用三维锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)技术,调查I类、II类和III类骨骼错颌分类中覆盖上颌和下颌切牙的唇侧骨厚度差异。
从一家正畸研究生诊所的档案中收集了54名白种人受试者(44名男性,10名女性)的治疗前CBCT图像。根据骨骼分类将受试者分为三组。CBCT扫描沿着每颗上颌和下颌切牙从根尖到切端的长轴进行定位,并测量和记录每颗切牙的轴向倾斜度。在上颌和下颌每颗切牙的根尖(A)和中点(MP)测量唇侧骨厚度。记录从唇侧骨表面到最前牙根表面两点处垂直于长轴的线性测量值。使用混合模型方差分析评估骨骼分类、颌骨、切牙位置和侧别对A、MP和倾斜度的影响。所有测试均采用5%的显著性水平。
III类个体根尖和中点处的骨厚度显著大于I类或II类个体。中切牙根尖和中点处的骨厚度显著更大。在下颌根尖水平处观察到显著更大的骨厚度。在中点水平处,上颌的厚度显著更大。I类患者以及III类患者的中切牙,在每个颌骨-切牙组合中,厚度与角度之间存在正相关。
切牙上方唇侧牙槽骨的厚度因每位患者潜在的骨骼差异而有所不同。骨骼差异影响上颌和下颌切牙的倾斜度。