Varallo Fabiana R, Trombotto Victória, Lucchetta Rosa C, Mastroianni Patricia de C
Americo Brasiliense State Hospital, Américo Brasiliense. Araraquara SP (Brazil).
Department of Drugs and Medicines, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP). Araraquara, SP (Brazil).
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2019 Jan-Mar;17(1):1361. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2019.1.1361. Epub 2019 Mar 4.
Although the management of hyperkalemia follows expert guidelines, treatment approaches are based on traditionally accepted practice standards. New drugs have been assessed such as sodium zirconium cyclosilicate and patiromer; however, their safety and efficacy or effectiveness have not yet been compared to traditional pharmacotherapy.
The present systematic review had the purpose to evaluate the efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of hyperkalemia pharmacotherapies.
PubMed, LILACS, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials were searched through November 2018. Clinical trial, cohort and case-control were searched. The risk of bias (RoB v2.0 and ROBINS-I) and quality of evidence (GRADE) at the level of outcomes were assessed.
Sixteen clinical trials and one retrospective cohort were identified regarding efficacy and safety of 24 different alternatives. The management of hyperkalemia remains empirical and off-label, since sodium zirconium cyclosilicate and patiromer are not available in several countries and further studies are required to assess efficacy, effectiveness and safety. Sodium or calcium polystyrene sulfonate (moderate confidence), sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (moderate confidence), and insulin plus dextrose (moderate confidence) showed superior efficacy to, respectively, placebo, no treatment, placebo, and dextrose. Other therapies (low confidence) showed similar efficacy compared to active or inactive alternatives. Most of the adverse events reported were nonspecific, so it was not possible to assign the cause and to classify as defined or probable.
Comparative cohort and case-control studies are need to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of new and traditional pharmacotherapies to support the development of guidelines about acute and chronic hyperkalemia, with high-quality evidence.
尽管高钾血症的管理遵循专家指南,但治疗方法是基于传统上被接受的实践标准。已对诸如环硅酸锆钠和帕替罗姆等新药进行了评估;然而,它们的安全性和有效性或效能尚未与传统药物治疗进行比较。
本系统评价旨在评估高钾血症药物治疗的疗效、效能和安全性。
检索截至2018年11月的PubMed、LILACS、Cochrane图书馆和临床试验数据库。检索临床试验、队列研究和病例对照研究。评估结局水平的偏倚风险(RoB v2.0和ROBINS-I)和证据质量(GRADE)。
确定了16项关于24种不同治疗方案的疗效和安全性的临床试验和1项回顾性队列研究。高钾血症的管理仍然是经验性的且未按药品说明书用药,因为环硅酸锆钠和帕替罗姆在多个国家不可用,需要进一步研究来评估疗效、效能和安全性。聚苯乙烯磺酸钠或钙(中等可信度)、环硅酸锆钠(中等可信度)以及胰岛素加葡萄糖(中等可信度)分别显示出比安慰剂、不治疗、安慰剂和葡萄糖更优的疗效。与活性或非活性对照相比,其他治疗方法(低可信度)显示出相似的疗效。报告的大多数不良事件是非特异性的,因此无法确定原因并分类为明确或可能。
需要进行比较队列研究和病例对照研究,以评估新的和传统药物治疗的安全性和有效性,为制定关于急性和慢性高钾血症的指南提供高质量证据。