Division of Paediatric Epidemiology, Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology und Informatics, University Medical Centre of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55101, Mainz, Germany.
Mannheim Institute of Public Health, Social and Preventive Medicine, University Medicine Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Ludolf-Krehl Strasse 7-11, 68167, Mannheim, Germany.
BMC Pediatr. 2019 Apr 24;19(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12887-019-1495-6.
While ICF-CY-based models of care are promising avenues for improving participation of children with chronic health conditions, feasible and valid instruments to assess participation as an outcome in routine are still needed. We aimed to validate a German parent-report version of the Child and Adolescent Scale of Participation (CASP) in children with chronic health conditions of different severity.
Cross-sectional data were collected in 327 children (mean age 7.8 years, 55% boys) from two paediatric centres (n = 112) and one population-based sample (n = 215). Cronbach's alpha, factor analyses, face validity assessments, correlation analyses, receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves, and parent-reported health-related quality of life (HRQoL: KINDL) were used to examine internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and capacity to differentiate between disease severity groups. Disease severity was operationalized according to ICD-diagnosis groups and/or parent-reports on health problems, medical and educational support, and medication. A newly developed item "overall perceived participation" was added to the CASP and evaluated.
We found good to excellent content validity, excellent internal consistency, and good-to-excellent test-retest reliability of the instrument. While children with mild disease had a significantly greater extent of participation (higher CASP scores) than children with severe disease, they did not differ from healthy children. Children with mild compared to severe disease much more differed in participation as measured by the CASP compared to the KINDL (area under the ROC curve: 0.92 vs. 0.75). In addition, the item "overall perceived participation" was highly correlated (r = 0.86) with the CASP total score, indicating the potential value of this specific single item. Finally, we provided preliminary reference values for the CASP obtained in a population-based sample of children without chronic health conditions.
The German version of the CASP and the new item are efficient, valid and reliable measures of social participation in childhood. The CASP-measured participation focuses more on attendance than on involvement into social circumstances of everyday life. To detect children with a high burden of disease on everyday life, the CASP may be more accurate than HRQoL instruments such as the KINDL. As outcome measurement, the CASP may facilitate the implementation of patient-centred paediatric health care.
虽然基于国际功能、残疾和健康分类儿童及青少年版(ICF-CY)的照护模式为改善患有慢性疾病儿童的参与度提供了有前景的途径,但仍需要可行且有效的工具来评估参与度作为常规结果。我们旨在验证用于评估不同严重程度慢性疾病儿童的参与度的儿童及青少年参与度量表(Child and Adolescent Scale of Participation,CASP)的德文家长报告版本。
在两个儿科中心(n=112)和一个基于人群的样本(n=215)中收集了 327 名儿童(平均年龄 7.8 岁,55%为男孩)的横断面数据。采用克朗巴赫 α系数、因子分析、表面效度评估、相关分析、受试者工作特征(receiver operating characteristics,ROC)曲线以及家长报告的健康相关生活质量(KINDL)来评估内部一致性、重测信度和区分疾病严重程度组的能力。根据 ICD 诊断组和/或家长报告的健康问题、医疗和教育支持以及药物使用情况对疾病严重程度进行了操作化。向 CASP 添加了一个新的项目“整体感知参与度”并对其进行了评估。
我们发现该工具具有良好到优秀的内容效度、优异的内部一致性和良好到优秀的重测信度。患有轻度疾病的儿童比患有重度疾病的儿童表现出更大程度的参与(CASP 得分更高),但与健康儿童无差异。与健康儿童相比,患有轻度疾病的儿童与患有重度疾病的儿童相比,CASP 评估的参与度差异更大(ROC 曲线下面积:0.92 比 0.75)。此外,“整体感知参与度”项目与 CASP 总分高度相关(r=0.86),表明该特定单项的潜在价值。最后,我们提供了在无慢性健康状况的基于人群的儿童样本中获得的 CASP 的初步参考值。
德文版 CASP 及其新项目是儿童社交参与的有效、有效且可靠的测量工具。CASP 测量的参与度更侧重于出勤率,而不是日常生活中的社交环境参与度。为了发现日常生活中疾病负担较高的儿童,CASP 可能比 KINDL 等健康相关生活质量工具更准确。作为结果测量,CASP 可能有助于实施以患者为中心的儿科保健。