Bettinger Julie A, Greyson Devon, Carpiano Richard, de Bruin Pamela, Aguiar Issy, Naus Monika, Hodson Brett
Vaccine Evaluation Center (Bettinger, Greyson), Department of Pediatrics, BC Children's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Communication (Greyson), University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Mass.; School of Public Policy, Department of Sociology and Center for Healthy Communities (Carpiano), University of California, Riverside, Riverside, Calif.; Interior Health Authority BC (de Bruin, Aguiar), Kelowna, BC; Communicable Diseases and Immunization Service (Naus), BC Centre for Disease Control; School of Population and Public Health (Naus), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Vancouver Island Health Authority (Hodson), Comox, BC; BC Patient Safety and Quality Council (Hodson), Vancouver, BC
Vaccine Evaluation Center (Bettinger, Greyson), Department of Pediatrics, BC Children's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Communication (Greyson), University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Mass.; School of Public Policy, Department of Sociology and Center for Healthy Communities (Carpiano), University of California, Riverside, Riverside, Calif.; Interior Health Authority BC (de Bruin, Aguiar), Kelowna, BC; Communicable Diseases and Immunization Service (Naus), BC Centre for Disease Control; School of Population and Public Health (Naus), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Vancouver Island Health Authority (Hodson), Comox, BC; BC Patient Safety and Quality Council (Hodson), Vancouver, BC.
CMAJ Open. 2019 Apr 23;7(2):E264-E271. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20190034. Print 2019 Apr-Jun.
Motivated by concerns of inadequate vaccination coverage and the potential for outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases, Canadian provinces have been discussing, implementing and tightening policies requiring documentation of vaccination for school enrolment. We sought to understand the acceptability of 14 potential vaccination policy levers among parents and other adults in British Columbia.
A representative online panel of 1308 adults in BC was surveyed in April 2017. Respondents were representative of the BC population by sex, age, geographic residence and percentage of household with children younger than 19 years. We used Poisson regression to estimate predictors of policy endorsement.
Most respondents (> 80%) held positive attitudes toward vaccination. Policies such as mandatory documentation of vaccination at school entry were supported by more than 75% of all respondents. Punitive policies, such as denial of child tax benefits for nonvaccination, were supported by less than 40% of respondents. In multivariable regression, respondents with positive attitudes toward vaccination were significantly more likely to strongly support all potential policies. Additionally, female respondents and respondents with postsecondary education were significantly more likely to strongly support policies involving additional requirements for parents.
Most adults in BC held favourable attitudes toward vaccination, and strong support existed for policies designed to support vaccination. This study provides evidence that most adults in BC are supportive of vaccination and, when presented with a wide range of options, would likely be supportive of information and requirement policy options designed to increase vaccination uptake.
出于对疫苗接种覆盖率不足以及疫苗可预防疾病爆发可能性的担忧,加拿大各省一直在讨论、实施并收紧入学疫苗接种记录要求的政策。我们试图了解不列颠哥伦比亚省家长和其他成年人对14种潜在疫苗接种政策手段的接受程度。
2017年4月,对不列颠哥伦比亚省1308名成年人的具有代表性的在线样本进行了调查。受访者在性别、年龄、地理居住情况以及家中有19岁以下儿童的家庭比例方面代表了不列颠哥伦比亚省的人口。我们使用泊松回归来估计政策认可的预测因素。
大多数受访者(>80%)对疫苗接种持积极态度。超过75%的受访者支持诸如入学时强制提供疫苗接种记录等政策。不到40%的受访者支持惩罚性政策,如不给未接种疫苗的儿童发放儿童税收福利。在多变量回归中,对疫苗接种持积极态度的受访者更有可能强烈支持所有潜在政策。此外,女性受访者和受过高等教育的受访者更有可能强烈支持涉及对家长有额外要求的政策。
不列颠哥伦比亚省的大多数成年人对疫苗接种持支持态度,并且对旨在支持疫苗接种的政策大力支持。这项研究提供了证据,表明不列颠哥伦比亚省的大多数成年人支持疫苗接种,并且在面对多种选择时,可能会支持旨在提高疫苗接种率的信息和要求类政策选择。