Murray-Davis Beth, Berger Howard, Melamed Nir, Hasan Haroon, Mawjee Karizma, Syed Maisah, Ray Joel G, Geary Michael, Barrett Jon, McDonald Sarah D
Midwifery Education Program (Murray-Davis, Syed), Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine (Berger, Mawjee), Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto; Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine (Melamed, Barrett), Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Better Outcomes Registry & Network (BORN) Ontario (Hasan), Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ont.; Departments of Medicine (Ray) and Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Ray), St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (Geary), Rotunda Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine (McDonald), Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Radiology (McDonald) and Department of Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (McDonald), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.
CMAJ Open. 2019 Apr 23;7(2):E283-E293. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20180116. Print 2019 Apr-Jun.
The primary aim of this study was to examine weight gain during pregnancy and associated adverse outcomes across different types of antenatal health care providers. Our research question examined whether type of antenatal health care provider (family physician, obstetrician, midwife, or family physician plus obstetrician) was associated with differing rates of excess or inadequate weight gain and associated adverse outcomes including being large for gestational age, being small for gestational age, cesarean delivery and preterm birth.
This retrospective cohort study used data from the Better Outcomes Registry & Network Information System, 2014-2016, for singleton hospital births at 20-42 weeks' gestation in Ontario. We calculated descriptive statistics to summarize patient characteristics and outcomes by antenatal health care provider. We calculated crude and adjusted relative risks with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the exposure (weight gain during pregnancy) relative to each secondary outcome by health care provider. We calculated population attributable fractions with 95% CIs to assess the proportion of secondary outcomes that could be prevented if inadequate or excess weight gain (according to the 2009 Institute of Medicine guidelines) were removed by health care provider.
The final cohort consisted of 231 697 pregnancies, of which 26 043 (11.2%), 136 994 (59.1%), 32 262 (13.9%) and 36 298 (15.7%) were managed by a family physician, obstetrician, midwife, and family physician plus obstetrician, respectively. Rates of weight gain below, within or above recommended levels were 31 742 (13.7%), 71 826 (31.0%) and 128 128 (55.3%), respectively, and did not differ across health care provider groups. No difference was observed in rates of secondary outcomes according to weight gain across health care providers. Excess weight gain was associated with a significant risk of being large for gestational age and cesarean delivery, and inadequate weight gain was associated with an increased risk of being small for gestational age and preterm birth. The population attributable fractions indicated a pronounced contribution of excess weight gain to being large for gestational age across all health care provider groups.
Weight gain during pregnancy and rates of associated secondary outcomes did not differ according to antenatal health care provider. This suggests a need for further research exploring counselling techniques and strategies for all types of antenatal health care providers to use in order to promote optimal weight gain during pregnancy.
本研究的主要目的是探讨不同类型的产前保健提供者在孕期的体重增加情况及相关不良结局。我们的研究问题是,产前保健提供者的类型(家庭医生、产科医生、助产士或家庭医生加产科医生)是否与体重增加过多或不足的不同发生率以及相关不良结局有关,这些不良结局包括大于胎龄、小于胎龄、剖宫产和早产。
这项回顾性队列研究使用了2014 - 2016年安大略省更好结局登记与网络信息系统的数据,用于20至42周单胎医院分娩。我们计算描述性统计量,以按产前保健提供者总结患者特征和结局。我们计算了相对于每个次要结局的粗略和调整后的相对风险以及95%置信区间(CI),这些相对风险是针对各医疗保健提供者的暴露因素(孕期体重增加)而言的。我们计算了人群归因分数及95% CI,以评估如果医疗保健提供者消除体重增加不足或过多(根据2009年医学研究所指南),可预防的次要结局的比例。
最终队列包括231697例妊娠,其中26043例(11.2%)、136994例(59.1%)、32262例(13.9%)和36298例(15.7%)分别由家庭医生、产科医生、助产士和家庭医生加产科医生管理。体重增加低于、处于或高于推荐水平的比例分别为31742例(13.7%)、71826例(31.0%)和128128例(55.3%),且在不同医疗保健提供者组之间无差异。根据体重增加情况,不同医疗保健提供者的次要结局发生率未观察到差异。体重增加过多与大于胎龄和剖宫产的显著风险相关,体重增加不足与小于胎龄和早产的风险增加相关。人群归因分数表明,在所有医疗保健提供者组中,体重增加过多对大于胎龄有显著影响。
孕期体重增加情况及相关次要结局的发生率不因产前保健提供者类型而异。这表明需要进一步研究探索所有类型的产前保健提供者可采用的咨询技术和策略,以促进孕期最佳体重增加。