Research Impact Informationist, Woodruff Health Sciences Center Library, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
J Med Libr Assoc. 2019 Apr;107(2):172-178. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2019.554. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
OBJECTIVE: Several publication databases now index the associated funding agency and grant number metadata with their publication records. Librarians who are familiar with the particulars of these databases can assist investigators and administrators with data gathering for publication summaries and metrics required for renewals of and progress reports for National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants. METHODS: Publication lists were pulled from three main indexers of publication-associated funding information (NIH RePORTER, PubMed, and Web of Science), using iterative search strategies. All discovered variations for the cited grant number of interest were recorded and tested. Publication lists were compared for overall coverage. RESULTS: A total of 986 publications citing the single grant number of interest were returned from the given time frame: 920 were found in PubMed, 860 in NIH RePORTER, and 787 in Web of Science. Web of Science offered the highest percentage of publications that were not found in the other 2 sources (n=63). Analysis of publication funding acknowledgments uncovered 21 variations of the specific NIH award of interest that were used to report funding support. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that while PubMed returns the most robust list of publications, variations in the format of reported funding support and indexing practices meant no one resource was sufficient to capture all publications that cited a given NIH project grant number. Librarians looking to help build grant-specific publication lists will need to use multiple resources and be aware of the most frequently reported grant variations to identify a comprehensive list of supported publications.
目的: 现在,有几个出版数据库将相关的资助机构和资助号元数据与其出版物记录相关联进行索引。熟悉这些数据库细节的图书馆员可以协助研究人员和管理人员收集出版物摘要和 NIH 资助续期和进展报告所需的指标数据。
方法: 使用迭代搜索策略,从三个主要的出版物相关资助信息索引器(NIH RePORTER、PubMed 和 Web of Science)中提取出版物列表。记录并测试了所有发现的感兴趣的引用资助号的变体。比较了出版物列表的总体覆盖范围。
结果: 在给定的时间范围内,共返回了 986 篇引用单一感兴趣资助号的出版物:920 篇在 PubMed 中,860 篇在 NIH RePORTER 中,787 篇在 Web of Science 中。Web of Science 提供了其他 2 个来源中未找到的出版物比例最高(n=63)。对出版物资助致谢的分析揭示了 21 种感兴趣的特定 NIH 奖励的资助支持变体,这些变体用于报告资助支持。
结论: 这项研究表明,虽然 PubMed 返回的出版物列表最完整,但报告资助支持的格式和索引实践的差异意味着没有一个资源足以捕获引用给定 NIH 项目资助号的所有出版物。希望帮助建立特定资助的出版物列表的图书馆员将需要使用多个资源,并注意最常报告的资助变体,以确定支持出版物的综合列表。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011-4-27
World Neurosurg. 2013-11-13
Can J Ophthalmol. 2011-8-4
Acad Radiol. 2011-8-27