文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期，新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

Scopus 和 Web of Science 之间的差异，医学期刊文章中资助信息的收录情况：一项后续研究。

Discrepancies among Scopus and Web of Science, coverage of funding information in medical journal articles: a follow-up study.

出版信息

J Med Libr Assoc. 2023 Jul 10;111(3):703-708. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2023.1513.

DOI:10.5195/jmla.2023.1513
PMID:37483361
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10361553/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This follow-up study aims to determine if and how the coverage of funding information in Web of Science Core Collection (WoS) and Scopus changed from 2015 to 2021. METHODS: The number of all funded articles published in 2021 was identified in WoS and Scopus bibliographic databases using bibliometric analysis on a sample of 52 prestigious medical journals. RESULTS: The analysis of the number of funded articles with funding information showed statistically significant differences between Scopus and WoS due to substantial differences in the number of funded articles between some single journals. CONCLUSION: Due to significant differences in the number of funded articles indexed in WoS and Scopus, which might be attributed to the different protocols for handling funding data in WoS and Scopus, we would still advise using both databases to obtain and analyze funding information.

摘要

目的：本随访研究旨在确定 Web of Science 核心合集（WoS）和 Scopus 中资金信息的覆盖范围是否以及如何从 2015 年到 2021 年发生变化。

方法：使用对 52 种著名医学期刊样本的文献计量学分析，在 WoS 和 Scopus 书目数据库中确定 2021 年发表的所有有资金资助文章的数量。

结果：由于一些单刊的有资金资助文章数量存在显著差异，因此对有资金资助信息的文章数量进行分析，发现 Scopus 和 WoS 之间存在统计学上的显著差异。

结论：由于 WoS 和 Scopus 中索引的有资金资助文章数量存在显著差异，这可能归因于 WoS 和 Scopus 中处理资金数据的不同协议，因此我们仍建议同时使用这两个数据库来获取和分析资金信息。

相似文献

[1]
Discrepancies among Scopus and Web of Science, coverage of funding information in medical journal articles: a follow-up study.

J Med Libr Assoc. 2023-7-10

[2]
Discrepancies among Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed coverage of funding information in medical journal articles.

J Med Libr Assoc. 2018-1

[3]
Bibliometrics of NIHR HTA monographs and their related journal articles.

BMJ Open. 2015-2-18

[4]
Coverage and quality: A comparison of Web of Science and Scopus databases for reporting faculty nursing publication metrics.

Nurs Outlook. 2017

[5]
Comparisons of citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals.

JAMA. 2009-9-9

[6]
The difference in referencing in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar.

ESC Heart Fail. 2019-12-30

[7]
Analysis of Production, Impact, and Scientific Collaboration on Difficult Airway Through the Web of Science and Scopus (1981-2013).

Anesth Analg. 2017-6

[8]
Análisis bibliométrico de las revistas médicas del Sistema de Clasificación de Revistas Mexicanas de Ciencia y Tecnología.

Gac Med Mex. 2019

[9]
Coverage of Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science: a case study of the h-index in nursing.

Nurs Outlook. 2012-6-30

[10]
Bibliometric analysis of core competencies associated nursing management publications.

J Nurs Manag. 2022-10

引用本文的文献

[1]
Association of smoking with depression among tuberculosis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BMC Public Health. 2025-8-6

[2]
Physical activity based interventions for reducing body mass index in children aged 6-12 years: a systematic review.

Front Pediatr. 2025-7-18

[3]
An exploratory study on the publication stages of early access articles in different bibliographic databases: A case study of IEEE journals.

PLoS One. 2025-6-11

[4]
Mapping the intersection of HIV and Alzheimer's disease: a bibliometric analysis of emerging research trends.

Front Neurol. 2025-4-29

[5]
Smart Contracts and Shared Platforms in Sustainable Health Care: Systematic Review.

JMIR Med Inform. 2025-1-31

[6]
Global research trends and frontiers in ferroptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma: a bibliometric and visualization study.

Front Oncol. 2024-12-11

[7]
COVID-19 and diabetes research: Where are we now and what does the future hold? A bibliometric visualization analysis.

Heliyon. 2024-9-10

[8]
The use of bibliometrics in nursing science: Topics, data sources and contributions to research and practice.

Nurs Open. 2024-9

[9]
Advancements and emerging trends in ophthalmic anti-VEGF therapy: a bibliometric analysis.

Int Ophthalmol. 2024-9-5

[10]
Mapping the landscape of research on insulin resistance: a visualization analysis of randomized clinical trials.

J Health Popul Nutr. 2024-1-9

本文引用的文献

[1]
Scientific laws of research funding to support citations and diffusion of knowledge in life science.

Scientometrics. 2022

[2]
Who funded the research behind the Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine?

BMJ Glob Health. 2021-12

[3]
Getting to the bottom of research funding: Acknowledging the complexity of funding dynamics.

PLoS One. 2021

[4]
A living mapping review for COVID-19 funded research projects: final (27 month) update.

Wellcome Open Res. 2023-7-26

[5]
A Strategy for International Cooperation in the COVID-19 Pandemic Era: Focusing on National Scientific Funding Data.

Healthcare (Basel). 2020-7-9

[6]
Nursing Research Literature Production in Terms of the Scope of Country and Health Determinants: A Bibliometric Study.

J Nurs Scholarsh. 2019-7-4

[7]
Searching by grant number: comparison of funding acknowledgments in NIH RePORTER, PubMed, and Web of Science.

J Med Libr Assoc. 2019-4-1

[8]
Discrepancies among Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed coverage of funding information in medical journal articles.

J Med Libr Assoc. 2018-1

[9]
Beyond funding: Acknowledgement patterns in biomedical, natural and social sciences.

PLoS One. 2017-10-4

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索