动态计算机断层扫描和非增强磁共振成像对非富血供胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤与胰腺导管腺癌的鉴别诊断

Differentiation between non-hypervascular pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma on dynamic computed tomography and non-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

作者信息

Ohki Kazuyoshi, Igarashi Takao, Ashida Hirokazu, Shiraishi Megumi, Nozawa Yosuke, Ojiri Hiroya

机构信息

The Jikei University School of Medicine, Japan.

出版信息

Pol J Radiol. 2019 Mar 13;84:e153-e161. doi: 10.5114/pjr.2019.84193. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine the differentiating features between non-hypervascular pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour (PNET) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) on dynamic computed tomography (CT) and non-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We enrolled 102 patients with non-hypervascular PNET ( = 15) or PDAC ( = 87), who had undergone dynamic CT and non-enhanced MRI. One radiologist evaluated all images, and the results were subjected to univariate and multivariate analyses. To investigate reproducibility, a second radiologist re-evaluated features that were significantly different between PNET and PDAC on multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Tumour margin (well-defined or ill-defined) and enhancement ratio of tumour (ERT) showed significant differences in univariate and multivariate analyses. Multivariate analysis revealed a predominance of well-defined tumour margins in non-hypervascular PNET, with an odds ratio of 168.86 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 10.62-2685.29; < 0.001). Furthermore, ERT was significantly lower in non-hypervascular PNET than in PDAC, with an odds ratio of 85.80 (95% CI: 2.57-2860.95; = 0.01). Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 86.7%, 96.6%, and 95.1%, respectively, when the tumour margin was used as the criteria. The values for ERT were 66.7%, 98.9%, and 94.1%, respectively. In reproducibility tests, both tumour margin and ERT showed substantial agreement (margin of tumour, κ = 0.6356; ERT, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) = 0.6155).

CONCLUSIONS

Non-hypervascular PNET showed well-defined margins and lower ERT compared to PDAC, with significant differences. Our results showed that non-hypervascular PNET can be differentiated from PDAC via dynamic CT and non-enhanced MRI.

摘要

目的

确定动态计算机断层扫描(CT)和非增强磁共振成像(MRI)上非富血管性胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤(PNET)与胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)之间的鉴别特征。

材料与方法

我们纳入了102例接受过动态CT和非增强MRI检查的非富血管性PNET患者(n = 15)或PDAC患者(n = 87)。由一名放射科医生评估所有图像,并对结果进行单因素和多因素分析。为研究可重复性,另一名放射科医生对多因素分析中PNET和PDAC之间有显著差异的特征进行了重新评估。

结果

肿瘤边界(清晰或不清晰)和肿瘤增强率(ERT)在单因素和多因素分析中均显示出显著差异。多因素分析显示,非富血管性PNET中肿瘤边界清晰的情况占优势,优势比为168.86(95%置信区间[CI]:10.62 - 2685.29;P < 0.001)。此外,非富血管性PNET的ERT显著低于PDAC,优势比为85.80(95% CI:2.57 - 2860.95;P = 0.01)。以肿瘤边界为标准时,敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为86.7%、96.6%和95.1%。ERT的相应值分别为66.7%、98.9%和94.1%。在可重复性测试中,肿瘤边界和ERT均显示出高度一致性(肿瘤边界,κ = 0.6356;ERT,组内相关系数[ICC] = 0.6155)。

结论

与PDAC相比,非富血管性PNET显示出边界清晰且ERT较低,差异显著。我们的结果表明,非富血管性PNET可通过动态CT和非增强MRI与PDAC相鉴别。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a049/6479137/977cd932b551/PJR-84-84193-g001.jpg

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索