• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

粪便潜血试验阳性后的第二次诊断评估的依从率:系统评价和荟萃分析。

The compliance rate for the second diagnostic evaluation after a positive fecal occult blood test: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petach Tikva, Israel.

Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

United European Gastroenterol J. 2019 Apr;7(3):424-448. doi: 10.1177/2050640619828185. Epub 2019 Feb 6.

DOI:10.1177/2050640619828185
PMID:31019712
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6466749/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Only a minority of patients with a positive fecal occult blood test (FOBT) undergo a follow-up second diagnostic procedure, thus minimizing its contribution for colorectal cancer (CRC) prevention. We aimed to obtain a precise estimation of this problem and also assess the diagnostic yield of CRC and adenomas by colonoscopy in these patients.

METHODS

Literature searches were conducted for "compliance" OR "adherence" AND "fecal occult blood test" OR "fecal immunohistochemical test" AND "colonoscopy." Comprehensive meta-analysis software was used.

RESULTS

The search resulted in 42 studies (512,496 patients with positive FOBT), published through December 31, 2017. A funnel plot demonstrates a moderate publication bias. Compliance with any second procedure, colonoscopy, or combination of double-contrast barium enema with or without sigmoidoscopy in patients with a positive FOBT was 0.725 with 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.649-0.790 ( = 0.000), 0.804 with 95% CI 0.740-0.856 ( = 0.000) and 0.197 with 95% CI 0.096-0.361 ( = 0.000), respectively. The diagnostic yield for CRC, advanced adenoma and simple adenoma was 0.058 with 95% CI 0.050-0.068 ( = 0.000), 0.242 with 95% CI 0.188-0.306 ( = 0.000) and 0.147 with 95% CI 0.116-0.184 ( < 0.001), respectively.

DISCUSSION

Compliance with diagnostic evaluation after a positive FOBT is still suboptimal. Therefore, measures to increase compliance need to be taken given the increased risk of CRC in these patients.

摘要

简介

只有少数粪便潜血试验(FOBT)阳性的患者接受后续的二次诊断程序,从而最大限度地降低了其在结直肠癌(CRC)预防中的作用。我们旨在准确评估这一问题,并评估这些患者结肠镜检查对 CRC 和腺瘤的诊断效果。

方法

对“依从性”或“顺应性”和“粪便潜血试验”或“粪便免疫化学试验”和“结肠镜检查”进行文献检索。使用综合荟萃分析软件。

结果

搜索结果为 42 项研究(512496 例 FOBT 阳性患者),发表时间截至 2017 年 12 月 31 日。漏斗图显示存在中度发表偏倚。FOBT 阳性患者对任何二次检查(结肠镜检查)或双重对比钡灌肠联合或不联合乙状结肠镜检查的依从性为 0.725(95%CI 0.649-0.790; = 0.000)、0.804(95%CI 0.740-0.856; = 0.000)和 0.197(95%CI 0.096-0.361; = 0.000)。CRC、高级腺瘤和单纯性腺瘤的诊断率分别为 0.058(95%CI 0.050-0.068; = 0.000)、0.242(95%CI 0.188-0.306; = 0.000)和 0.147(95%CI 0.116-0.184; < 0.001)。

讨论

FOBT 阳性后诊断评估的依从性仍然不理想。因此,鉴于这些患者 CRC 风险增加,需要采取措施提高依从性。

相似文献

1
The compliance rate for the second diagnostic evaluation after a positive fecal occult blood test: A systematic review and meta-analysis.粪便潜血试验阳性后的第二次诊断评估的依从率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2019 Apr;7(3):424-448. doi: 10.1177/2050640619828185. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
2
Contribution of the OC Sensor immunoassay in comparison to the Hemoccult II guaiac-test in organized colorectal cancer screening.OC 传感器免疫测定与 Hemoccult II 愈创木脂检测在有组织的结直肠癌筛查中的比较。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2019 Feb;34(2):163-172. doi: 10.1007/s10654-018-0471-z. Epub 2018 Dec 8.
3
Diagnostic Yield of One-Time Colonoscopy vs One-Time Flexible Sigmoidoscopy vs Multiple Rounds of Mailed Fecal Immunohistochemical Tests in Colorectal Cancer Screening.在结直肠癌筛查中,一次性结肠镜检查与一次性乙状结肠镜检查和多次邮寄粪便免疫化学检测的诊断收益比较。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Mar;18(3):667-675.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.08.015. Epub 2019 Aug 13.
4
Role of double-contrast barium enema in colorectal cancer screening based on fecal occult blood.基于粪便潜血的双重对比钡灌肠在结直肠癌筛查中的作用
Tumori. 2002 Mar-Apr;88(2):95-8. doi: 10.1177/030089160208800203.
5
Trends in colonoscopy and fecal occult blood test use after the introduction of dual screening offers in Germany: Results from a large population-based study, 2003-2016.德国开展双重筛查后结肠镜检查和粪便潜血试验应用趋势:基于人群的大型研究结果,2003-2016 年。
Prev Med. 2019 Jun;123:333-340. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.03.048. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
6
Test performance of immunologic fecal occult blood testing and sigmoidoscopy compared with primary colonoscopy screening for colorectal advanced adenomas.免疫粪便潜血试验与乙状结肠镜检查和结肠镜检查筛查结直肠高级腺瘤的性能比较。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2011 Oct;4(10):1563-71. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-11-0076. Epub 2011 Jul 12.
7
Screening for colorectal neoplasms with new fecal occult blood tests: update on performance characteristics.使用新型粪便潜血试验筛查结直肠肿瘤:性能特征的最新进展。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007 Oct 3;99(19):1462-70. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djm150. Epub 2007 Sep 25.
8
Diagnostic performance of flexible sigmoidoscopy combined with fecal immunochemical test in colorectal cancer screening: meta-analysis and modeling.灵活乙状结肠镜检查联合粪便免疫化学试验在结直肠癌筛查中的诊断性能:荟萃分析和建模。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2017 Jun;32(6):481-493. doi: 10.1007/s10654-017-0279-2. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
9
10
What is the best screening strategy to detect advanced colorectal adenomas? Simulation from ongoing Italian screening experiences.检测进展期大肠腺瘤的最佳筛查策略是什么?来自意大利现行筛查经验的模拟研究。
Tumori. 2011 Sep-Oct;97(5):547-50. doi: 10.1177/030089161109700501.

引用本文的文献

1
Painless colonoscopy: fact or fiction?无痛结肠镜检查:事实还是虚构?
Clin Endosc. 2024 Sep;57(5):581-587. doi: 10.5946/ce.2024.001. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
2
Adherence to follow-up and resource use after abnormal FIT-screening: Evaluation of the Danish colorectal cancer screening program.粪便免疫化学检测筛查异常后的随访依从性及资源利用情况:丹麦结直肠癌筛查项目评估
Endosc Int Open. 2024 May 3;12(5):E649-E658. doi: 10.1055/a-2297-9622. eCollection 2024 May.
3
Development of a Follow-Up Measure to Ensure Complete Screening for Colorectal Cancer.制定后续措施以确保全面进行结直肠癌筛查
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Mar 4;7(3):e242693. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.2693.
4
Robotic Colonoscopy and Beyond: Insights into Modern Lower Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.机器人结肠镜检查及其他:现代下消化道内镜检查洞察
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jul 23;13(14):2452. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13142452.
5
Rates of Follow-up Colonoscopy After a Positive Stool-Based Screening Test Result for Colorectal Cancer Among Health Care Organizations in the US, 2017-2020.美国医疗保健组织中基于粪便的结直肠癌筛查试验阳性后的结肠镜随访率,2017-2020 年。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jan 3;6(1):e2251384. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.51384.
6
Comorbidities and Risk Factors of Patients Diagnosed with CRC after Positive Fecal Test in Real Life.现实生活中粪便检测呈阳性后被诊断为结直肠癌患者的合并症及风险因素
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Nov 12;14(22):5557. doi: 10.3390/cancers14225557.
7
Robotic, self-propelled, self-steerable, and disposable colonoscopes: Reality or pipe dream? A state of the art review.机器人控制、自行推进、自动转向、一次性使用的结肠镜:现实还是白日梦? 最新技术综述。
World J Gastroenterol. 2022 Sep 21;28(35):5093-5110. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i35.5093.
8
Optimising colorectal cancer screening in Shanghai, China: a modelling study.优化中国上海结直肠癌筛查:模型研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 May 16;12(5):e048156. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048156.
9
Precision Patient Navigation to Improve Rates of Follow-up Colonoscopy, An Individual Randomized Effectiveness Trial.精准患者导航以提高结肠镜随访率:一项个体随机有效性试验。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2021 Dec;30(12):2327-2333. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-1793. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
10
Non-compliance with colonoscopy after a positive faecal immunochemical test doubles the risk of dying from colorectal cancer.粪便免疫化学检测阳性后结肠镜检查不依从会使结直肠癌死亡风险增加一倍。
Gut. 2022 Mar;71(3):561-567. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-322192. Epub 2021 Mar 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Population-based colorectal cancer screening programmes using a faecal immunochemical test: should faecal haemoglobin cut-offs differ by age and sex?使用粪便免疫化学检测的基于人群的结直肠癌筛查项目:粪便血红蛋白临界值应因年龄和性别而异吗?
BMC Cancer. 2017 Aug 29;17(1):577. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3555-3.
2
Clinical impact of the immunochemical fecal occult blood test for colorectal cancer screening in Brazil.免疫化学粪便潜血试验在巴西结直肠癌筛查中的临床影响
Ann Gastroenterol. 2017;30(4):442-445. doi: 10.20524/aog.2017.0151. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
3
Association between socioeconomic deprivation and colorectal cancer screening outcomes: Low uptake rates among the most and least deprived people.社会经济剥夺与结直肠癌筛查结果之间的关联:最贫困和最不贫困人群的低接受率。
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 16;12(6):e0179864. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179864. eCollection 2017.
4
Colorectal and interval cancers of the Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in the Basque Country (Spain).西班牙巴斯克地区结直肠癌筛查项目中的结直肠癌和间隔期癌
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Apr 21;23(15):2731-2742. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i15.2731.
5
Association Between Time to Colonoscopy After a Positive Fecal Test Result and Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Cancer Stage at Diagnosis.粪便检测结果呈阳性后至结肠镜检查的时间与结直肠癌风险及诊断时癌症分期之间的关联。
JAMA. 2017 Apr 25;317(16):1631-1641. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.3634.
6
Inadequate Utilization of Diagnostic Colonoscopy Following Abnormal FIT Results in an Integrated Safety-Net System.综合安全网系统中粪便免疫化学检测结果异常后诊断性结肠镜检查的利用不足
Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Feb;112(2):375-382. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.555. Epub 2016 Dec 13.
7
Screening for Colorectal Cancer and Evolving Issues for Physicians and Patients: A Review.结直肠癌筛查及医生与患者面临的新问题:综述
JAMA. 2016 Nov 22;316(20):2135-2145. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.17418.
8
Real-Time Monitoring of Results During First Year of Dutch Colorectal Cancer Screening Program and Optimization by Altering Fecal Immunochemical Test Cut-Off Levels.荷兰结直肠癌筛查计划第一年中实时监测结果以及通过调整粪便免疫化学检测截断值进行优化
Gastroenterology. 2017 Mar;152(4):767-775.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.11.022. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
9
A randomised comparison of two faecal immunochemical tests in population-based colorectal cancer screening.基于人群的结直肠癌筛查中两种粪便免疫化学检测的随机比较。
Gut. 2017 Nov;66(11):1975-1982. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-311819. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
10
Population-Based Colonoscopy Screening for Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.基于人群的结肠镜检查用于结直肠癌筛查:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Jul 1;176(7):894-902. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.0960.