Studnicki James, Longbons Tessa, Fisher John W, Harrison Donna J, Skop Ingrid, MacKinnon Sharon J
Charlotte Lozier Institute, Arlington, VA, USA.
American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Eau Claire, MI, USA.
Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol. 2019 Apr 15;6:2333392819841211. doi: 10.1177/2333392819841211. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
Controversy exists regarding whether doctors who perform abortions should be required to hold hospital admitting privileges, but no research exists as to the extent to which they actually hold and use such privileges. Extensive Internet and government data sources were used to identify and verify abortionists in Florida. All medical and osteopathic abortion doctors who were licensed to practice at any time during the period 2011 to 2016 were included in the study (n = 85). Every abortionist hospital admission of a female patient aged 15 to 44 occurring during the 6-year study period was identified (n = 21 502). Abortionist physicians are 74.1% male, 62% have been in practice for 30 years or longer, 27.1% are graduates of foreign medical schools, and 55.3% are board certified. Nearly half (48.2%) of the abortionists had at least 1 malpractice claim, public complaint, disciplinary action, or criminal charge. Half (50.6%) of the abortionists reported hospital privileges, but only 32 (37.6%) admitted at least 1 patient to a hospital. Seven physicians accounted for 68.2% of all the admissions, and 79.6% of all admissions were related to a live birth. Black was the modal race (47.6%) and Medicaid the most frequent (64.9%) pay source. Nearly one-fifth (19.4%) of admissions came through the emergency department. Physicians who hold hospital privileges are significantly ( < .05) more likely to be board certified and to be approved for Medicaid payment than their colleagues without privileges. Of those doctors who hold and use hospital privileges, the lowest admission volume physicians are significantly less likely to be involved in live births, more likely to admit commercially insured and white inpatients, and much more likely to use the emergency room as the route to hospital admissions for their Medicaid-eligible and black patients. Further study of abortionist physicians is indicated regarding their heterogeneous personal and professional characteristics; their career pathways and practice concentrations; their relative integration with or isolation from peers and the professional network; the importance of black and poor induced abortion patients in their total caseload; and, especially for abortionists without hospital privileges, the means by which their patients requiring emergency care and hospitalization are accommodated.
对于实施堕胎手术的医生是否应被要求拥有医院准入特权存在争议,但对于他们实际拥有和使用此类特权的程度尚无相关研究。利用广泛的互联网和政府数据源来识别和核实佛罗里达州的堕胎医生。2011年至2016年期间任何时候获得行医执照的所有医学和整骨医学堕胎医生都被纳入研究(n = 85)。确定了在6年研究期间堕胎医生收治的年龄在15至44岁的女性患者(n = 21502)。堕胎医生中男性占74.1%,62%的人执业30年或更长时间,27.1%毕业于外国医学院校,55.3%获得了委员会认证。近一半(48.2%)的堕胎医生至少有1次医疗事故索赔、公众投诉、纪律处分或刑事指控。一半(50.6%)的堕胎医生报告拥有医院特权,但只有32人(37.6%)收治了至少1名患者入院。7名医生占所有入院病例的68.2%,所有入院病例的79.6%与活产有关。黑人是最常见的种族(47.6%),医疗补助是最常见的支付来源(64.9%)。近五分之一(19.4%)的入院病例是通过急诊科收治的。拥有医院特权的医生比没有特权的同事获得委员会认证和获得医疗补助支付批准的可能性显著更高(P <.05)。在那些拥有并使用医院特权的医生中,入院量最低的医生参与活产的可能性显著更低,收治商业保险和白人住院患者的可能性更高,并且更有可能将急诊室作为其符合医疗补助条件的黑人患者入院的途径。有必要对堕胎医生的异质个人和专业特征、他们的职业路径和执业集中情况、他们与同行和专业网络的相对融合或隔离、黑人及贫困堕胎患者在其总病例量中的重要性,尤其是对于没有医院特权的堕胎医生,其需要紧急护理和住院治疗的患者的安置方式进行进一步研究。