Suppr超能文献

复发性自发性冠状动脉夹层的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:一例报告

Percutaneous coronary intervention in recurrent spontaneous coronary artery dissection: a case report.

作者信息

Phang Calvin, Whitbourn Robert

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, St Vincent's Hospital, 41 Royal Parade, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2019 Mar 4;3(1):ytz021. doi: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytz021. eCollection 2019 Mar.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is an infrequent but potentially life-threatening condition in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Conservative medical therapy is recommended in patients with SCAD. However, very little evidence exists in the management of recurrent SCAD when conservative medical therapy fails.

CASE SUMMARY

A 48-year-old woman presented with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) on a background of cigarette smoking. Her coronary angiogram showed the first diagonal artery (D1) and right marginal branch (RM) occlusion with angiographic appearance that is consistent with SCAD. She was medically managed. She represented 2 months later with another NSTEMI, and her coronary angiogram showed healing SCAD in the D1 and RM, but a new SCAD in the first obtuse marginal artery (OM1). She was managed medically. She represented 4 months later complaining of angina every 2 days. This time her coronary angiogram showed healed SCAD in OM1 and RM, but the recurrence of SCAD in D1. Given that she had recurrent events despite medical therapy, we decided to proceed with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to D1. She presented with an atypical chest pain 10 months later and her coronary angiogram showed complete healing of all coronary arteries and a patent stent in D1. She has remained symptom free.

DISCUSSION

The management of SCAD is contentious given the lack of randomized clinical trials to assess optimal treatment strategy. In most patients with SCAD, conservative medical therapy is recommended after the diagnosis is secured. We believe that PCI may be beneficial in patients with recurrent SCAD.

摘要

背景

自发性冠状动脉夹层(SCAD)在急性心肌梗死患者中虽不常见,但可能危及生命。推荐对SCAD患者进行保守药物治疗。然而,当保守药物治疗失败时,复发性SCAD的管理方面几乎没有证据。

病例摘要

一名48岁女性,有吸烟史,出现非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)。其冠状动脉造影显示第一对角支动脉(D1)和右缘支(RM)闭塞,血管造影表现与SCAD一致。她接受了药物治疗。2个月后她再次就诊,又出现一次NSTEMI,冠状动脉造影显示D1和RM处的SCAD已愈合,但第一钝缘支动脉(OM1)出现新的SCAD。她再次接受药物治疗。4个月后她前来就诊,主诉每2天发作一次心绞痛。这次冠状动脉造影显示OM1和RM处的SCAD已愈合,但D1处SCAD复发。鉴于尽管进行了药物治疗她仍有复发性事件,我们决定对D1进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)。10个月后她出现非典型胸痛,冠状动脉造影显示所有冠状动脉完全愈合,D1处支架通畅。她一直无症状。

讨论

鉴于缺乏评估最佳治疗策略的随机临床试验,SCAD的管理存在争议。在大多数SCAD患者中,确诊后推荐保守药物治疗。我们认为PCI可能对复发性SCAD患者有益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b196/6439372/fc653ba0bbba/ytz021f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验