• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人类活动可能会影响加拉巴哥群岛达尔文雀的肠道微生物群。

Human activity can influence the gut microbiota of Darwin's finches in the Galapagos Islands.

机构信息

Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut.

Colegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales, Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Cumbayá, Quito, Ecuador.

出版信息

Mol Ecol. 2019 May;28(9):2441-2450. doi: 10.1111/mec.15088. Epub 2019 Apr 25.

DOI:10.1111/mec.15088
PMID:31021499
Abstract

The gut microbiota of animal hosts can be influenced by environmental factors, such as unnatural food items that are introduced by humans. Over the past 30 years, human presence has grown exponentially in the Galapagos Islands, which are home to endemic Darwin's finches. Consequently, humans have changed the environment and diet of Darwin's finches, which in turn, could affect their gut microbiota. In this study, we compared the gut microbiota of two species of Darwin's finches, small ground finches (Geospiza fuliginosa) and medium ground finches (Geospiza fortis), across sites with and without human presence, where finches prefer human-processed and natural food, respectively. We predicted that: (a) finch microbiota would differ between sites with and without humans due to differences in diet, and (b) gut microbiota of each finch species would be most similar where finches have the highest niche overlap (areas with humans) compared to the lowest niche overlap (areas without humans). We found that gut bacterial community structure differed across sites and host species. Gut bacterial diversity was most distinct between the two species at the site with human presence compared to the site without human presence, which contradicted our predictions. Within host species, medium ground finches had lower bacterial diversity at the site with human presence compared to the site without human presence and bacterial diversity of small ground finches did not differ between sites. Our results show that the gut microbiota of Darwin's finches is affected differently across sites with varying human presence.

摘要

动物宿主的肠道微生物群可以受到环境因素的影响,例如人类引入的非自然食物。在过去的 30 年中,人类在加拉帕戈斯群岛的数量呈指数级增长,达尔文雀的特有种就在这里。因此,人类改变了达尔文雀的环境和饮食,这反过来可能会影响它们的肠道微生物群。在这项研究中,我们比较了有人类和没有人类存在的两个达尔文雀种(小地雀和中地雀)的肠道微生物群,在有人类和没有人类的地方,雀类分别更喜欢人类加工的和自然的食物。我们预测:(a)由于饮食的不同,雀类的微生物群在有人类和没有人类的地方会有所不同;(b)每种雀类的肠道微生物群在有人类的地方(高生态位重叠区)与在没有人类的地方(低生态位重叠区)的相似度最高。我们发现,肠道细菌群落结构在不同地点和宿主物种之间存在差异。与没有人类存在的地方相比,在有人存在的地方,两种雀类的肠道细菌多样性差异最大,这与我们的预测相反。在同一物种内,与没有人类存在的地方相比,中地雀在有人存在的地方的细菌多样性较低,而小地雀的细菌多样性在不同地点没有差异。我们的研究结果表明,在有不同人类存在的地方,达尔文雀的肠道微生物群受到不同的影响。

相似文献

1
Human activity can influence the gut microbiota of Darwin's finches in the Galapagos Islands.人类活动可能会影响加拉巴哥群岛达尔文雀的肠道微生物群。
Mol Ecol. 2019 May;28(9):2441-2450. doi: 10.1111/mec.15088. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
2
An inter-island comparison of Darwin's finches reveals the impact of habitat, host phylogeny, and island on the gut microbiome.岛屿间的达尔文雀比较揭示了栖息地、宿主进化史和岛屿对肠道微生物组的影响。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 13;14(12):e0226432. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226432. eCollection 2019.
3
The gut of the finch: uniqueness of the gut microbiome of the Galápagos vampire finch.雀鸟的肠道:加拉帕戈斯吸血鬼雀鸟肠道微生物组的独特性。
Microbiome. 2018 Sep 19;6(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0555-8.
4
Host-specific associations affect the microbiome of Philornis downsi, an introduced parasite to the Galápagos Islands.宿主特异性关联影响了加拉帕戈斯群岛外来寄生虫——南美长尾蝇的微生物群。
Mol Ecol. 2017 Sep;26(18):4644-4656. doi: 10.1111/mec.14219. Epub 2017 Aug 2.
5
Galápagos mockingbirds tolerate introduced parasites that affect Darwin's finches.加拉帕戈斯嘲鸫能容忍影响达尔文雀的外来寄生虫。
Ecology. 2016 Apr;97(4):940-950. doi: 10.1890/15-0119.1.
6
Galápagos mockingbirds tolerate introduced parasites that affect Darwin's finches.加拉帕戈斯地雀能耐受影响达尔文雀的外来寄生虫。
Ecology. 2016 Apr;97(4):940-50.
7
Effect of urbanization and parasitism on the gut microbiota of Darwin's finch nestlings.城市化和寄生对达尔文雀雏鸟肠道微生物群的影响。
Mol Ecol. 2023 Nov;32(22):6059-6069. doi: 10.1111/mec.17164. Epub 2023 Oct 14.
8
Human influences on antipredator behaviour in Darwin's finches.人类对达尔文雀防御行为的影响。
J Anim Ecol. 2020 Feb;89(2):614-622. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.13127. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
9
Host phylogeny, diet, and habitat differentiate the gut microbiomes of Darwin's finches on Santa Cruz Island.宿主进化史、饮食和栖息地使圣克鲁斯岛上的达尔文雀的肠道微生物组存在差异。
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 11;9(1):18781. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-54869-6.
10
Darwin's Galapagos finches in modern biology.达尔文的加拉帕戈斯雀在现代生物学中的作用。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Apr 12;365(1543):1001-7. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0321.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring Bird Gut Microbiota Through Opportunistic Fecal Sampling: Ecological and Evolutionary Perspectives.通过机会性粪便采样探索鸟类肠道微生物群:生态与进化视角
Ecol Evol. 2025 Apr 14;15(4):e71291. doi: 10.1002/ece3.71291. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Exploring stress and morphology in two songbird species across urban, agricultural, and natural habitats on San Cristobal Island, Galapagos.在加拉帕戈斯群岛圣克里斯托瓦尔岛的城市、农业和自然栖息地中,对两种鸣禽的应激与形态进行研究。
BMC Zool. 2025 Mar 10;10(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s40850-025-00221-7.
3
The Influence of Microbiota on Wild Birds' Parental Coprophagy Behavior: Current Advances and Future Research Directions.
微生物群对野生鸟类亲代食粪行为的影响:当前进展与未来研究方向
Microorganisms. 2024 Nov 30;12(12):2468. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12122468.
4
Urbanization impoverishes taxonomic but not functional diversity of the gut microbiota in a forest specialist ground beetle, Carabus convexus.城市化使森林专食性步甲 Carabus convexus 的肠道微生物区系的分类多样性而非功能多样性减少。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 26;14(1):25546. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-75864-6.
5
Diversity of gut microbiome in Rocky Mountainsnail across its native range.落矶山蜗牛(Rocky Mountainsnail)在其原生范围内的肠道微生物组多样性。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 27;18(11):e0290292. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290292. eCollection 2023.
6
Temporal Variations in the Gut Microbiota of the Globally Endangered Sichuan Partridge (Arborophila rufipectus): Implications for Adaptation to Seasonal Dietary Change and Conservation.全球濒危雉类四川雉鸡(Arborophila rufipectus)肠道微生物组的时间变化:对季节性饮食变化和保护的适应意义。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2023 Jun 28;89(6):e0074723. doi: 10.1128/aem.00747-23. Epub 2023 Jun 5.
7
The gut microbiome of wild American marten in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan.密歇根州上半岛的野生美洲貂的肠道微生物组。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 3;17(11):e0275850. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275850. eCollection 2022.
8
A comprehensive comparison of fecal microbiota in three ecological bird groups of raptors, waders, and waterfowl.猛禽、涉禽和水禽这三类生态鸟类粪便微生物群的综合比较。
Front Microbiol. 2022 Aug 8;13:919111. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.919111. eCollection 2022.
9
Comparing western (Megascops kennicottii) and whiskered (M. trichopsis) screech-owl microbiomes in southern Arizona using a novel 16S rRNA sequencing method.使用一种新型的16S rRNA测序方法比较亚利桑那州南部西部鸣角鸮(Megascops kennicottii)和须鸣角鸮(M. trichopsis)的微生物群落。
Anim Microbiome. 2022 Jul 30;4(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s42523-022-00196-7.
10
Where did the finch go? Insights from radio telemetry of the medium ground finch ().达尔文雀去了哪里?来自中型地雀无线电遥测的见解()。 需注意,原文括号内内容缺失,可能影响完整理解。
Ecol Evol. 2022 Apr 26;12(4):e8768. doi: 10.1002/ece3.8768. eCollection 2022 Apr.