IQVIA, Courbevoie, France.
Vifor Pharma France, Paris, France.
ESC Heart Fail. 2019 Jun;6(3):559-569. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12432. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
This analysis aims to evaluate the budget impact of intravenous iron therapy with ferric carboxymaltose for patients with systolic chronic heart failure and iron deficiency, from the perspective of the French public health insurance.
A budget impact model was adapted to forecast the budget impact over 5 years, according to two scenarios: one where patients receive ferric carboxymaltose according to market share forecast and another where patients are not treated for iron deficiency. Clinical data were extrapolated from pooled data from four randomized controlled trials. The time horizon was extended to 5 years by applying transition probabilities estimated from the CONFIRM-HF trial. Epidemiological parameters for France were derived from the literature. Cost parameters were derived from national available databases. In the base case analysis, the modelled 5 year cost difference between the scenarios with ferric carboxymaltose vs. no iron deficiency treatment in a population of 189 334 prevalent and incident patients led to €0.8m savings. The cumulative savings resulted from a reduction in the hospitalization costs associated with worsening heart failure (€-35.8m) as well as a reduction in the follow-up costs (€-2.9m). These cost savings outweighed the costs of ferric carboxymaltose treatment (€37.7m). Sensitivity analyses showed that the budget impact varied from €-34m to €+146m. Parameters with the most impact on the budget were the hospitalization rate for patients not treated for iron deficiency, the number of ambulatory sessions needed, the absence of hospitalization cost differentiation between New York Heart Association classes, and administration settings costs.
Iron deficiency treatment with ferric carboxymaltose in systolic chronic heart failure patients results in an improvement of New York Heart Association class and thereby increases the well-being of the patients, while providing an overall cost saving for the French national health insurance.
本分析旨在从法国公共医疗保险的角度评估静脉铁治疗用羧基麦芽糖铁治疗收缩性慢性心力衰竭伴缺铁患者的预算影响。
根据两种方案(一种是根据市场份额预测给患者使用羧基麦芽糖铁,另一种是不给患者治疗缺铁),采用预算影响模型来预测 5 年内的预算影响。临床数据来自四项随机对照试验的汇总数据进行推断。通过应用 CONFIRM-HF 试验估计的转移概率将时间范围延长至 5 年。法国的流行病学参数来自文献。成本参数来自国家可用数据库。在基本案例分析中,在 189334 例现有和新发患者人群中,与不缺铁治疗相比,羧基麦芽糖铁方案的 5 年模型成本差异导致节省了 80 万欧元。累积节省来自与心力衰竭恶化相关的住院费用减少(-3580 万欧元)以及随访费用减少(-290 万欧元)。这些节省的成本超过了羧基麦芽糖铁治疗的成本(3770 万欧元)。敏感性分析表明,预算影响范围为-3400 万欧元至+1.46 亿欧元。对预算影响最大的参数是未接受铁缺乏治疗的患者的住院率、需要的门诊次数、纽约心脏协会(NYHA)分级的住院费用无差异以及管理设置费用。
在收缩性慢性心力衰竭患者中用羧基麦芽糖铁治疗缺铁症可改善纽约心脏协会(NYHA)分级,从而提高患者的生活质量,同时为法国国家健康保险节省总体成本。