Lee Kong Chian Natural History Museum, National University of Singapore, 2 Conservatory Drive, Singapore, 117377, Singapore.
Herpetology Laboratory, Department of Biology, La Sierra University, 4500 Riverwalk Parkway, Riverside, CA, 92515, USA.
BMC Evol Biol. 2019 Apr 25;19(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12862-019-1422-3.
Recent studies have demonstrated that Bayesian species delimitation based on the multispecies coalescent model can produce inaccurate results by misinterpreting population splits as species divergences. An approach based on the genealogical divergence index (gdi) was shown to be a viable alternative, especially for delimiting allopatric populations where gene flow is low. We implemented these analyses to assess species boundaries in Southeast Asian toads, a group that is understudied and characterized by numerous unresolved species complexes.
Multilocus phylogenetic analyses showed that deep evolutionary relationships including the genera Sigalegalephrynus, Ghatophryne, Parapelophryne, Leptophryne, Pseudobufo, Rentapia, and Phrynoides remain unresolved. Comparison of genetic divergences revealed that intraspecific divergences among allopatric populations of Pelophyrne signata (Borneo vs. Peninsular Malaysia), Ingerophrynus parvus (Peninsular Malaysia vs. Myanmar), and Leptophryne borbonica (Peninsular Malaysia, Java, Borneo, and Sumatra) are consistent with interspecific divergences of other Southeast Asian bufonid taxa. Conversely, interspecific divergences between Pelophryne guentheri/P. api, Ansonia latiffi/A. leptopus, and I. gollum/I. divergens were low (< 3%) and consistent with intraspecific divergences of other closely related taxa. The BPP analysis produced variable results depending on prior settings and priors estimated from empirical data produced the best results that were also congruent with the gdi analysis.
This study showed that the evolutionary history of Southeast Asian toads is difficult to resolve and numerous relationships remain ambiguous. Although some results from the species delimitation analyses were inconclusive, they were nevertheless efficacious at identifying potential new species and taxonomic incompatibilities for future in-depth investigation. We also demonstrated the sensitivity of BPP to different priors and that careful selection priors based on empirical data can greatly improve the analysis. Finally, the gdi can be a robust tool to complement other species delimitation methods.
最近的研究表明,基于多物种合并模型的贝叶斯物种界定方法可能会产生不准确的结果,因为它将种群分裂错误地解释为物种分化。基于系统发育分歧指数(gdi)的方法被证明是一种可行的替代方法,特别是在基因流动较低的异域种群中。我们实施了这些分析,以评估东南亚蟾蜍的物种边界,该群体研究较少,其特征是存在许多未解决的物种复合体。
多基因座系统发育分析表明,包括 Sigalegalephrynus、Ghatophryne、Parapelophryne、Leptophryne、Pseudobufo、Rentapia 和 Phrynoides 在内的属之间的深层进化关系仍未得到解决。遗传分歧的比较表明,Pelophyrne signata(婆罗洲与马来半岛)、Ingerophrynus parvus(马来半岛与缅甸)和 Leptophryne borbonica(马来半岛、爪哇岛、婆罗洲和苏门答腊岛)的异域种群之间的种内分歧与其他东南亚蟾蜍类群的种间分歧一致。相反,Pelophryne guentheri/P. api、Ansonia latiffi/A. leptopus 和 I. gollum/I. divergens 之间的种间分歧较低(<3%),与其他密切相关类群的种内分歧一致。BPP 分析的结果因先验设置而异,从经验数据估计的先验产生了最好的结果,也与 gdi 分析一致。
本研究表明,东南亚蟾蜍的进化历史难以解决,许多关系仍然模糊不清。尽管物种界定分析的一些结果不确定,但它们仍然有效地识别了潜在的新物种和未来深入调查的分类学不兼容。我们还证明了 BPP 对不同先验的敏感性,以及基于经验数据仔细选择先验可以大大改善分析。最后,gdi 可以作为一种强大的工具来补充其他物种界定方法。