Suppr超能文献

健康相关生活质量和无家可归者与有住房者中六种慢性疾病的患病率:英格兰伦敦和伯明翰的横断面研究。

Health-related quality of life and prevalence of six chronic diseases in homeless and housed people: a cross-sectional study in London and Birmingham, England.

机构信息

Institute of Epidemiology and Healthcare, University College London, London, UK.

Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 24;9(4):e025192. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025192.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare health-related quality of life and prevalence of chronic diseases in housed and homeless populations.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey with an age-matched and sex-matched housed comparison group.

SETTING

Hostels, day centres and soup runs in London and Birmingham, England.

PARTICIPANTS

Homeless participants were either sleeping rough or living in hostels and had a history of sleeping rough. The comparison group was drawn from the Health Survey for England. The study included 1336 homeless and 13 360 housed participants.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Chronic diseases were self-reported asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), epilepsy, heart problems, stroke and diabetes. Health-related quality of life was measured using EQ-5D-3L.

RESULTS

Housed participants in more deprived neighbourhoods were more likely to report disease. Homeless participants were substantially more likely than housed participants in the most deprived quintile to report all diseases except diabetes (which had similar prevalence in homeless participants and the most deprived housed group). For example, the prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was 1.1% (95% CI 0.7% to 1.6%) in the least deprived housed quintile; 2.0% (95% CI 1.5% to 2.6%) in the most deprived housed quintile; and 14.0% (95% CI 12.2% to 16.0%) in the homeless group. Social gradients were also seen for problems in each EQ-5D-3L domain in the housed population, but homeless participants had similar likelihood of reporting problems as the most deprived housed group. The exception was problems related to anxiety, which were substantially more common in homeless people than any of the housed groups.

CONCLUSIONS

While differences in health between housed socioeconomic groups can be described as a 'slope', differences in health between housed and homeless people are better understood as a 'cliff'.

摘要

目的

比较有住房者和无住房者的健康相关生活质量和慢性病患病率。

设计

与有住房者年龄和性别匹配的横断面调查,有住房者对照组来自英格兰伦敦和伯明翰的收容所、日间中心和施粥处。

地点

英格兰伦敦和伯明翰的收容所、日间中心和施粥处。

参与者

无住房者要么是无家可归者,要么是住在收容所,并且有过流浪经历。对照组来自英格兰健康调查。研究包括 1336 名无住房者和 13360 名有住房者。

结果测量

慢性病为自我报告的哮喘、慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)、癫痫、心脏问题、中风和糖尿病。健康相关生活质量使用 EQ-5D-3L 进行测量。

结果

居住在贫困程度较高社区的有住房者更有可能报告患病。在最贫困的五分位数中,无住房者比最贫困的五分位数中居住在收容所的有住房者更有可能报告所有疾病,但糖尿病除外(无住房者和最贫困的有住房组的糖尿病患病率相似)。例如,最贫困的五分位数中居住在收容所的有住房者慢性阻塞性肺病的患病率为 1.1%(95%CI 0.7%至 1.6%);最贫困的五分位数中居住在收容所的有住房者为 2.0%(95%CI 1.5%至 2.6%);无住房者为 14.0%(95%CI 12.2%至 16.0%)。在有住房人群中,每个 EQ-5D-3L 领域的问题也存在社会梯度,但无住房者报告问题的可能性与最贫困的有住房组相似。唯一的例外是与焦虑相关的问题,无住房者比任何有住房群体都更常见。

结论

虽然有住房社会经济群体之间的健康差异可以被描述为“坡度”,但有住房者和无住房者之间的健康差异更像是“悬崖”。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a57/6501971/61c3635b8b6a/bmjopen-2018-025192f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验