Suppr超能文献

应用于获得性脑损伤患者的自主能力进展量表的可靠性。

The Reliability of the Progression of Autonomies Scale Applied on Acquired Brain Injured Patients.

作者信息

Arcuri Francesco, Cortese Maria Daniela, Riganello Francesco, Lucca Lucia Francesca, Serra Sebastiano, Mazzucchi Anna, Cerasa Antonio, Tonin Paolo

机构信息

Research in Advanced Neurorehabilitation, S. Anna Institute, Crotone, Italy.

Department for ABI Care and Rehabilitation, Don Gnocchi Foundation, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2019 Apr 10;10:342. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00342. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

The Progression of Autonomies Scale (PAS) is a behavioral scale useful to assess the autonomy levels in acquired brain-injured patients. It provides a broad profile, assessing different domains of human activities ranging from personal, domestic, and extradomestic autonomies. This cross-sectional study is aimed at evaluating the reliability of this scale on a large cohort of acquired brain injury (ABI) patients. Fifty-one ABI patients (49% traumatic, 33.3% hemorrhagic, 17.7% other etiologies), hospitalized in the S. Anna Institute of Crotone, Italy (mean age male 46.08 ± 14.53 and mean age female patients 43.2 ± 11.3) were recruited. We found a high level of reliability of the scale, with a coefficient at the inter-rater agreement between substantial (0.61 ≤ ≤ 0.8) and almost perfect (0.81 ≤ ≤ 1), and almost perfect at the test-retest (intra-rater). We confirm that the PAS is a well-structured tool for the assessment of the autonomy levels in brain-injured patients. These findings encourage the application of this scale in the clinical practice of rehabilitation unit to design a tailored rehabilitation treatment on real goals and to monitor the generalization of the recovered abilities to the daily routine activities.

摘要

自主性进展量表(PAS)是一种行为量表,有助于评估后天性脑损伤患者的自主水平。它提供了一个广泛的概况,评估人类活动的不同领域,从个人、家庭和家庭以外的自主性。这项横断面研究旨在评估该量表在一大群后天性脑损伤(ABI)患者中的可靠性。招募了51名ABI患者(49%为创伤性,33.3%为出血性,17.7%为其他病因),他们在意大利克罗托内的圣安娜研究所住院(男性平均年龄46.08±14.53岁,女性患者平均年龄43.2±11.3岁)。我们发现该量表具有高度的可靠性,评分者间一致性系数在实质性(0.61≤≤0.8)和几乎完美(0.81≤≤1)之间,重测(评分者内)时几乎完美。我们证实PAS是评估脑损伤患者自主水平的一种结构良好的工具。这些发现鼓励在康复单元的临床实践中应用该量表,以根据实际目标设计量身定制的康复治疗,并监测恢复能力在日常活动中的泛化情况。

相似文献

3
A study of the reliability of the Nociception Coma Scale.伤害性感受昏迷量表的可靠性研究。
Clin Rehabil. 2015 Apr;29(4):388-93. doi: 10.1177/0269215514546767. Epub 2014 Aug 29.
10
Reliability of the Cooking Task in adults with acquired brain injury.后天性脑损伤成人烹饪任务的可靠性。
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2015;25(2):298-317. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2014.971819. Epub 2014 Nov 10.

本文引用的文献

8
Understanding 'independence': perspectives of occupational therapists.
Disabil Rehabil. 2007 Jul 15;29(13):1021-33. doi: 10.1080/09638280600929110.
9

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验