• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2005-15 年老年男性的照护与全因死亡率:康科德男性健康与衰老研究。

Caregiving and all-cause mortality in older men 2005-15: the Concord Health and Ageing in Men Project.

机构信息

Centre for Education and Research on Ageing, University of Sydney and Concord Clinical School, Sydney, Australia.

Centre for Big Data Research in Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Age Ageing. 2019 Jul 1;48(4):571-576. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afz039.

DOI:10.1093/ageing/afz039
PMID:31028375
Abstract

BACKGROUND

while both negative and positive impacts of caregiving on health have been reported, findings regarding caregiver's mortality may be biased by the lack of consideration of changes in their health and caregiving status during follow-up. This study examines the impact of caregiving on the risk of death in older men, allowing for caregiving-transition by individuals and adjusting for changes over time in their health status.

METHODS

data from 1639 men age ≥70 years old from the Concord Health and Ageing in Men Project (CHAMP) were collected between baseline (2005-07), 2-year and 5-year follow-up and linked to death records up to 30 September 2015. A time-varying Cox proportional hazards model was used to examine the risk of death from caregiving between 2005 and 2015, adjusting for baseline education, history of myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, and risk factors which may change over time (age, income, self-rated overall health, number of morbidities, physical disability, depression and anxiety).

RESULTS

the average follow-up was 7.39 years (SD = 2.95) with 495 deaths observed. There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality between caregivers and non-caregivers in the multivariable model (HR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.67-1.32, P = 0.73).

CONCLUSIONS

this study addressed the dynamic caregiving role and covariates which has been rarely considered in the literature. While there is concern that when older people take on a caring role their health suffers, we found no difference in mortality between older male caregivers and non-caregivers when we accounted for transitions in their caregiving status.

摘要

背景

虽然已经报道了照顾对健康的负面影响和积极影响,但由于在随访期间没有考虑到照顾者健康和照顾状态的变化,因此关于照顾者死亡率的研究结果可能存在偏差。本研究通过允许个体在随访期间转换照顾角色,并调整其健康状况随时间的变化,考察了照顾对老年男性死亡风险的影响。

方法

本研究的数据来自年龄≥70 岁的 1639 名男性,他们来自 Concord 健康和老龄化男性项目(CHAMP),数据收集于基线(2005-07 年)、2 年和 5 年随访期,并与截至 2015 年 9 月 30 日的死亡记录相关联。使用时变 Cox 比例风险模型来检查 2005 年至 2015 年期间因照顾而死亡的风险,调整了基线教育、心肌梗死史、充血性心力衰竭和可能随时间变化的风险因素(年龄、收入、自我评估总体健康状况、患病数量、身体残疾、抑郁和焦虑)。

结果

平均随访时间为 7.39 年(SD = 2.95),观察到 495 例死亡。在多变量模型中,照顾者和非照顾者的全因死亡率没有显著差异(HR:0.95,95%CI:0.67-1.32,P = 0.73)。

结论

本研究解决了动态照顾角色和文献中很少考虑的协变量问题。虽然人们担心当老年人承担照顾角色时,他们的健康会受到影响,但当我们考虑到他们照顾角色的转变时,我们发现老年男性照顾者和非照顾者的死亡率没有差异。

相似文献

1
Caregiving and all-cause mortality in older men 2005-15: the Concord Health and Ageing in Men Project.2005-15 年老年男性的照护与全因死亡率:康科德男性健康与衰老研究。
Age Ageing. 2019 Jul 1;48(4):571-576. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afz039.
2
Multiple, but not traditional risk factors predict mortality in older people: the Concord Health and Ageing in Men Project.多种而非传统的风险因素可预测老年人的死亡率:康科德男性健康与老龄化项目。
Age (Dordr). 2014;36(6):9732. doi: 10.1007/s11357-014-9732-2. Epub 2014 Nov 18.
3
Caregiving reduces mortality risk for most caregivers: a census-based record linkage study.对大多数照料者而言,提供照料可降低死亡风险:一项基于人口普查的记录链接研究。
Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Dec;44(6):1959-69. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyv172.
4
Self-reported health impacts of caregiving by age and income among participants of the Canadian 2012 General Social Survey.加拿大 2012 年综合社会调查中按年龄和收入划分的护理人员自我报告的健康影响。
Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2019 May;39(5):169-177. doi: 10.24095/hpcdp.39.5.01.
5
The Relationship Between Caregiving and Mortality After Accounting for Time-Varying Caregiver Status and Addressing the Healthy Caregiver Hypothesis.在考虑随时间变化的照料者状态并探讨健康照料者假说后,照料与死亡率之间的关系。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2015 Sep;70(9):1163-8. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glv009. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
6
Informal caregiving and mortality-Who is protected and who is not? A prospective cohort study from Japan.非正规照护与死亡率——谁受到保护,谁又没有?来自日本的一项前瞻性队列研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Feb;223:24-30. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.01.034. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
7
Self-rated health and physician-rated health as independent predictors of mortality in elderly men.自评健康和医生评定健康作为老年人死亡率的独立预测因素。
Age Ageing. 2012 Mar;41(2):165-71. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afr161. Epub 2011 Dec 16.
8
How fast does the Grim Reaper walk? Receiver operating characteristics curve analysis in healthy men aged 70 and over.死神走得有多快?对 70 岁及以上健康男性的接受者操作特征曲线分析。
BMJ. 2011 Dec 15;343:d7679. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d7679.
9
Caregiving Intensity and Mortality in Older Women, Accounting for Time-Varying and Lagged Caregiver Status: The Caregiver-Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Study.照顾强度与老年女性死亡率:考虑到照顾者状态的时变和滞后因素:骨质疏松性骨折研究中的照顾者研究。
Gerontologist. 2019 Sep 17;59(5):e461-e469. doi: 10.1093/geront/gny135.
10
Association between pain and the frailty phenotype in older men: longitudinal results from the Concord Health and Ageing in Men Project (CHAMP).老年人疼痛与虚弱表型的相关性:来自康科德男性健康与衰老研究(CHAMP)的纵向研究结果。
Age Ageing. 2018 May 1;47(3):381-387. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afy012.

引用本文的文献

1
A Tale of Two Solitudes: Loneliness and Anxiety of Family Caregivers Caring in Community Homes and Congregate Care.《两种孤独:在社区家庭和集中护理中护理的家庭照顾者的孤独和焦虑》。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 23;18(19):10010. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910010.
2
Age-dependency in mortality of family caregivers: a nationwide register-based study.家庭照顾者死亡率的年龄依赖性:一项基于全国登记数据的研究。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2021 Jul;33(7):1971-1980. doi: 10.1007/s40520-020-01728-4. Epub 2020 Oct 11.