• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Letter to the Editor concerning "Is MIS-TLIF superior to open TLIF in obese patients?: A systematic review and meta-analysis" by Tan JH et al. (Eur Spine J; 2018: doi:10.1007/s00586-018-5630-0).

作者信息

Liang Long, Feng Minshan, Han Tao, Yin Xunlu, Zhu Liguo, Liu Guangwei, Wei Xu

机构信息

Wangjing Hospital of Chinese Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Huajiadi Street, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100102, China.

Beijing Key Laboratory of Orthopedics of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Haiyuncang Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100102, China.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2019 Aug;28(8):1879-1880. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-05977-4. Epub 2019 Apr 27.

DOI:10.1007/s00586-019-05977-4
PMID:31030262
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Letter to the Editor concerning "Is MIS-TLIF superior to open TLIF in obese patients?: A systematic review and meta-analysis" by Tan JH et al. (Eur Spine J; 2018: doi:10.1007/s00586-018-5630-0).致编辑的信，关于谭JH等人发表的《肥胖患者中微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术是否优于开放经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术？：一项系统评价与荟萃分析》（《欧洲脊柱杂志》；2018年：doi:10.1007/s00586-018-5630-0）
Eur Spine J. 2019 Aug;28(8):1879-1880. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-05977-4. Epub 2019 Apr 27.
2
Reply to the Letter to the Editor of L. Liang et al. concerning "Is MIS-TLIF superior to open TLIF in obese patients?: A systematic review and meta-analysis" by Tan JH et al. (Eur Spine J, 2018; doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5630-0).
Eur Spine J. 2019 Aug;28(8):1881-1883. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-05976-5. Epub 2019 May 2.
3
Comments to the Letter to the Editor of S. Shahsavari et al. concerning "Predicting medical complications in spine surgery: evaluation of a novel online risk calculator" by M. F. Kasparek et al. (Eur Spine J: doi:10.1007/s00586-018-5707-9) and the reply to the Letter to the Editor of S. Shahsavari et al. concerning "Predicting medical complications in spine surgery: evaluation of a novel online risk calculator" by M. F. Kasparek et al. (Eur Spine J: doi:10.1007/s00586-018-5707-9).致《欧洲脊柱杂志》编辑的信的评论，内容涉及S. Shahsavari等人对M. F. Kasparek等人所著的“脊柱手术中医疗并发症的预测：一种新型在线风险计算器的评估”（《欧洲脊柱杂志》：doi:10.1007/s00586-018-5707-9）的评论，以及对S. Shahsavari等人致编辑信的回复，该信同样涉及M. F. Kasparek等人所著的“脊柱手术中医疗并发症的预测：一种新型在线风险计算器的评估”（《欧洲脊柱杂志》：doi:10.1007/s00586-018-5707-9） 。
Eur Spine J. 2018 Nov;27(11):2889-2890. doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5783-x. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
4
Answer to the Letter to the Editor of He Maolin et al. concerning "Comparison of unilateral versus bilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty for the treatment of patients with osteoporosis vertebral compression fracture (OVCF): a systematic review and meta-analysis" by Cheng X, Long HQ, Xu JH, et al. Eur Spine J (2016) 25: 3439. doi:10.1007/s00586-016-4395-6.对何茂林等人致编辑信的回复，该信涉及程X、龙HQ、徐JH等人发表的“单侧与双侧经皮椎体后凸成形术治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折（OVCF）患者的比较：系统评价与荟萃分析”。《欧洲脊柱杂志》（2016年）25卷：3439页。doi:10.1007/s00586-016-4395-6 。
Eur Spine J. 2017 Apr;26(4):1322-1323. doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-4965-2. Epub 2017 Feb 6.
5
Is MIS-TLIF superior to open TLIF in obese patients?: A systematic review and meta-analysis.在肥胖患者中，微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术（MIS-TLIF）是否优于开放经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术（open TLIF）？一项系统评价与Meta分析
Eur Spine J. 2018 Aug;27(8):1877-1886. doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5630-0. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
6
Letter to the Editor concerning "To pool or not to pool. Comment on 'The efficacy of primary sacroiliac joint fusion for low back pain caused by sacroiliac joint pathology: a systematic review and meta-analysis'" by A. Abbas, et al. (Eur Spine J [2022]: doi:10.1007/s00586-022-07291-y).致编辑的信：关于A.阿巴斯等人所著的《是否进行合并。对“原发性骶髂关节融合术治疗骶髂关节病变引起的腰痛的疗效：系统评价和荟萃分析”的评论》（《欧洲脊柱杂志》[2022]：doi:10.1007/s00586-022-07291-y）
Eur Spine J. 2023 May;32(5):1850-1852. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07611-w. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
7
Answer to the Letter to the Editor of M. Saltychev concerning "To pool or not to pool. Comment on 'the efficacy of primary sacroiliac joint fusion for low back pain caused by sacroiliac joint pathology: a systematic review and meta-analysis'" by A. Abbas, et al. (Eur Spine J [2022]: doi: 10.1007/s00586-022-07291-y).对M. 萨尔蒂切夫致《欧洲脊柱杂志》编辑信件的回复，该信件涉及A. 阿巴斯等人发表的《是否合并：对“原发性骶髂关节融合术治疗骶髂关节病变引起的腰痛的疗效：系统评价和荟萃分析”的评论》（《欧洲脊柱杂志》[2022]：doi: 10.1007/s00586-022-07291-y）
Eur Spine J. 2023 May;32(5):1853-1855. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07614-7. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
8
Answer to the Letter to the Editor of Jianqiang Ni et al. concerning "ALIF and total disc replacement versus 2-level circumferential fusion with TLIF: a prospective, randomized, clinical and radiological trial" by Hoff EK, Strube P, Pumberger M, et al. (2015) Eur Spine J. doi:10.1007/s00586-015-3852-y.对倪建强等人致编辑信的回复，该信涉及霍夫·E·K、施特鲁贝·P、庞贝格·M等人发表于《欧洲脊柱杂志》（2015年）的“前路腰椎椎间融合术与全椎间盘置换术对比双节段经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术：一项前瞻性、随机、临床及影像学试验”，doi:10.1007/s00586-015-3852-y 。
Eur Spine J. 2015 Oct;24(10):2347-9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-3972-4. Epub 2015 Apr 26.
9
Letter to the Editor concerning "The association of back muscle strength and sarcopenia-related parameters in the patients with spinal disorders" by Toyoda H, et al. (Eur Spine J; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5858-8).致编辑的信：关于丰田浩等人发表的《脊柱疾病患者背部肌肉力量与肌肉减少症相关参数的关联》（《欧洲脊柱杂志》；https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5858-8）
Eur Spine J. 2019 May;28(5):1250-1251. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-05941-2. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
10
Answer to the Letter to the Editor concerning "The association of back muscle strength and sarcopenia-related parameters in the patients with spinal disorders" by Toyoda H, et al. (Eur Spine J; doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5858-8).对丰田博等人（《欧洲脊柱杂志》；doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5858-8）所著《脊柱疾病患者背部肌肉力量与肌肉减少症相关参数的关联》致编辑信的回复
Eur Spine J. 2019 May;28(5):1252-1253. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-05942-1. Epub 2019 Mar 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Minimally Invasive Surgery Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and TLIF for Treatment of Lumbar Spine Stenosis.微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术与 TLIF 治疗腰椎管狭窄症的比较。
J Healthc Eng. 2022 Jan 25;2022:9389239. doi: 10.1155/2022/9389239. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Is MIS-TLIF superior to open TLIF in obese patients?: A systematic review and meta-analysis.在肥胖患者中，微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术（MIS-TLIF）是否优于开放经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术（open TLIF）？一项系统评价与Meta分析
Eur Spine J. 2018 Aug;27(8):1877-1886. doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5630-0. Epub 2018 Jun 1.