Metry Ayman Anis, Wahba Ramy M, Nakhla George M, Abdelmalek Fady A, Ragaei Milad Z, Fahmy Neven G
Department of Anesthesia, ICU and Pain Management, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Anesth Essays Res. 2019 Jan-Mar;13(1):84-90. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_20_19.
BACKGROUND: This study had been formulated to evaluate and compare the analgesic effect of preemptive (PE), postoperative (PO), and combined knee intra-articular injection (IAI) of levobupivacaine and tramadol after knee arthroscopy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 220 patients assigned for therapeutic knee arthroscopy were divided into four equal groups. Patients in Group C received IAI of 20 mL (0.5%) levobupivacaine preoperative, meanwhile patients in Group PE received IAI of 18 mL (0.5%) levobupivacaine with 100 mg tramadol (2 mL). Patients in Group PO received IAI of 18 mL (0.5%) levobupivacaine with 100 mg tramadol (2 mL) postoperatively, whereas patients in Group PE/PO received IAI of 19 mL (0.25%) levobupivacaine with 50 mg tramadol (1 mL) preoperatively and postoperatively. Numeric rating scale (NRS) had been used to assess pain sensation. Duration till the first request of rescue analgesia and number of requests were recorded. RESULTS: NRS scores were significantly higher in Group C compared to other groups and in Group PE in comparison to PO and PE/PO groups. Frequency of rescue analgesia requests was significantly higher in Group C with significantly higher mean times of requests, while was significantly lower in Group PE/PO with significantly lower mean times of requests when compared to groups PE and PO. CONCLUSIONS: PE levobupivacaine and tramadol IAI provided satisfactory level of PO analgesia after therapeutic arthroscopy. However, combined PE and PO levobupivacaine and tramadol IAI of half dose provided PO analgesia superior to that provided by either PE or PO full-dose IAI.
背景:本研究旨在评估和比较左布比卡因和曲马多膝关节镜检查前(PE)、术后(PO)及联合膝关节腔内注射(IAI)的镇痛效果。 材料与方法:共有220例接受治疗性膝关节镜检查的患者被分为四组。C组患者术前接受20 mL(0.5%)左布比卡因的IAI,同时,PE组患者接受18 mL(0.5%)左布比卡因与100 mg曲马多(2 mL)的IAI。PO组患者术后接受18 mL(0.5%)左布比卡因与100 mg曲马多(2 mL)的IAI,而PE/PO组患者术前和术后接受19 mL(0.25%)左布比卡因与50 mg曲马多(1 mL)的IAI。采用数字评分量表(NRS)评估疼痛感觉。记录至首次要求使用补救性镇痛药的持续时间和要求次数。 结果:与其他组相比,C组的NRS评分显著更高,与PO组和PE/PO组相比,PE组的NRS评分显著更高。C组补救性镇痛药的要求频率显著更高,平均要求次数显著更多,而与PE组和PO组相比,PE/PO组的要求频率显著更低,平均要求次数显著更少。 结论:PE左布比卡因和曲马多IAI在治疗性关节镜检查后提供了令人满意的PO镇痛水平。然而,PE和PO联合使用半剂量的左布比卡因和曲马多IAI提供的PO镇痛效果优于PE或PO全剂量IAI。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011-4-6
Anesth Essays Res. 2010