Gillen Joseph, Nita-Lazar Aleksandra
Laboratory of Immune System Biology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Front Physiol. 2019 Apr 11;10:425. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00425. eCollection 2019.
Viral and pathogen protein complexity is often limited by their relatively small genomes, thus critical functions are often accomplished by complexes of host and pathogen proteins. This requirement makes the study of host-pathogen interactions critical for the understanding of pathogenicity and virology. This review article discusses proteomic methods that offer an opportunity to experimentally identify and analyze the binding partners of a target protein and presents the representative studies performed with these methods. These methods divide into two classes: and . assays depend on bindings that occur outside of the normal cellular environment and include yeast two hybrids, pull-downs, and nucleic acid-programmable protein arrays (NAPPA). assays depend on bindings that occur inside of host cells and include affinity purification (AP) and proximity dependent labeling (PDL). Either or methods can be reliably used for generating protein-protein interactions networks but it is important to understand and recognize the limitations of the chosen methods when developing an interactomic network. In summary, proteomic methods can be extremely useful for interactomics but it is important to recognize the nature of the method when designing and analyzing an experiment.
病毒和病原体蛋白质的复杂性通常受到其相对较小基因组的限制,因此关键功能往往由宿主和病原体蛋白质的复合物来完成。这一需求使得宿主-病原体相互作用的研究对于理解致病性和病毒学至关重要。这篇综述文章讨论了蛋白质组学方法,这些方法为通过实验鉴定和分析目标蛋白质的结合伙伴提供了机会,并展示了用这些方法进行的代表性研究。这些方法分为两类: 和 。 分析依赖于在正常细胞环境之外发生的结合,包括酵母双杂交、下拉实验和核酸可编程蛋白质阵列(NAPPA)。 分析依赖于在宿主细胞内发生的结合,包括亲和纯化(AP)和邻近依赖性标记(PDL)。 或 方法都可以可靠地用于生成蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用网络,但在构建相互作用组网络时,了解并认识所选方法的局限性很重要。总之,蛋白质组学方法对于相互作用组学可能极其有用,但在设计和分析实验时认识方法的本质很重要。