Huber Nikolaus, Marasco Valeria, Painer Johanna, Vetter Sebastian G, Göritz Frank, Kaczensky Petra, Walzer Chris
Department of Integrative Biology and Evolution, Research Institute of Wildlife Ecology, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Department of Integrative Biology and Evolution, Konrad Lorenz Institute of Ethology, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Front Vet Sci. 2019 Apr 11;6:105. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00105. eCollection 2019.
Wildlife management, conservation interventions and wildlife research programs often involve capture, manipulation and transport of wild animals. Widespread empirical evidence across various vertebrate taxa shows that handling wildlife generally induces a severe stress response resulting in increased stress levels. The inability of individuals to appropriately respond to rapidly changing environmental conditions during and after manipulations may have deleterious and long-lasting implications on animal welfare. Therefore, mitigating stress responses in the frame of conservation interventions is a key animal welfare factor. However, we have a poor understanding of the metrics to adequately assess and monitor the dynamic physiological changes that animals undergo when subjected to stressful procedures in wild or captive conditions. A growing number of studies provide good evidence for reciprocal interactions between immune processes and stress. Here, we review the existing literature on a relatively new technique-Leukocyte Coping Capacity (LCC), a proxy for stress quantifying oxygen radical production by leukocytes. We discuss the strength and weaknesses of this immunological approach to evaluate stress, the individual capacity to cope with stress and the resulting potential implications for animal welfare. Additionally we present new data on LCC in captive roe deer () under long-time anesthesia and free-ranging Asiatic wild asses (Kulan; ) were LCC was used to assess stress levels in animals captured for a reintroduction project.
野生动物管理、保护干预措施以及野生动物研究项目常常涉及对野生动物的捕捉、操控和运输。 across various vertebrate taxa shows that handling wildlife generally induces a severe stress response resulting in increased stress levels. The inability of individuals to appropriately respond to rapidly changing environmental conditions during and after manipulations may have deleterious and long-lasting implications on animal welfare. Therefore, mitigating stress responses in the frame of conservation interventions is a key animal welfare factor. However, we have a poor understanding of the metrics to adequately assess and monitor the dynamic physiological changes that animals undergo when subjected to stressful procedures in wild or captive conditions. A growing number of studies provide good evidence for reciprocal interactions between immune processes and stress. Here, we review the existing literature on a relatively new technique-Leukocyte Coping Capacity (LCC), a proxy for stress quantifying oxygen radical production by leukocytes. We discuss the strength and weaknesses of this immunological approach to evaluate stress, the individual capacity to cope with stress and the resulting potential implications for animal welfare. Additionally we present new data on LCC in captive roe deer () under long-time anesthesia and free-ranging Asiatic wild asses (Kulan; ) were LCC was used to assess stress levels in animals captured for a reintroduction project.
在各种脊椎动物类群中广泛的实证证据表明,处理野生动物通常会引发严重的应激反应,导致应激水平升高。个体在操控期间及之后无法对快速变化的环境条件做出适当反应,可能会对动物福利产生有害且持久的影响。因此,在保护干预框架内减轻应激反应是动物福利的一个关键因素。然而,我们对在野生或圈养条件下动物经受应激程序时充分评估和监测其动态生理变化的指标了解甚少。越来越多的研究为免疫过程与应激之间的相互作用提供了有力证据。在此,我们回顾了关于一种相对较新的技术——白细胞应对能力(LCC)的现有文献,LCC是一种通过白细胞量化氧自由基产生来衡量应激的指标。我们讨论了这种评估应激的免疫学方法的优缺点、个体应对应激的能力以及对动物福利的潜在影响。此外,我们还展示了关于圈养狍在长时间麻醉下以及自由放养的亚洲野驴(印度野驴;)的LCC新数据,在印度野驴中LCC被用于评估为重新引入项目捕获的动物的应激水平。