Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2010 Mar 24;5(3):e9791. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009791.
Animals captive bred for reintroduction are often housed under conditions which are not representative of their preferred social structure for at least part of the reintroduction process. Specifically, this is most likely to occur during the final stages of the release programme, whilst being housed during transportation to the release site. The degree of social stress experienced by individuals during this time may negatively impact upon their immunocompetence.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We examined two measure of stress--body weight and Leukocyte Coping Capacity (LCC)--to investigate the effects of group size upon captive-bred water voles destined for release within a reintroduction program. Water voles were housed in laboratory cages containing between one and eight individuals. LCC scores were negatively correlated with group size, suggesting that individuals in larger groups experienced a larger degree of immuno-suppression than did individuals housed in smaller groups or individually. During the course of the study mean body weights increased, in contrast to expectations from a previous study. This was attributed to the individuals sampled being sub-adults and thus growing in length and weight during the course of the investigation.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The reintroduction process will inevitably cause some stress to the release cohort. However, for water voles we conclude that the stress experienced may be reduced by decreasing group size within captive colony and/or transportation housing practises. These findings are of significance to other species' reintroductions, in highlighting the need to consider life-history strategies when choosing housing systems for animals being maintained in captivity prior to release to the wild. A reduction in stress experienced at the pre-release stage may improve immunocompetence and thus animal welfare and initial survival post-release.
用于再引进的圈养动物在再引进过程的至少部分阶段通常被安置在不符合其偏好的社会结构的条件下。具体来说,这最有可能发生在释放计划的最后阶段,同时在运输到释放地点期间被安置。个体在此期间经历的社会压力程度可能会对其免疫能力产生负面影响。
方法/主要发现:我们检查了两个压力指标——体重和白细胞应对能力(LCC)——以研究群体大小对即将在再引进计划中释放的圈养水鼠的影响。水鼠被安置在实验室笼子中,每个笼子中包含一到八只个体。LCC 评分与群体大小呈负相关,表明群体较大的个体经历的免疫抑制程度大于群体较小的个体或单独饲养的个体。在研究过程中,平均体重增加,与之前研究的预期相反。这归因于被抽样的个体是亚成年个体,因此在研究过程中会增加长度和体重。
结论/意义:再引进过程不可避免地会给释放群体带来一些压力。然而,对于水鼠,我们得出的结论是,通过减少圈养群体中的群体大小和/或运输住房实践,可以减轻所经历的压力。这些发现对于其他物种的再引进具有重要意义,强调了在选择用于在释放到野外之前在圈养中饲养的动物的住房系统时需要考虑生活史策略。在释放前阶段减轻所经历的压力可能会提高免疫能力,从而提高动物福利和释放后的初始存活率。