Suppr超能文献

评估肌萎缩侧索硬化症患者的上肢功能的 ALSFRS-R。

Assessing upper limb function with ALSFRS-R in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients.

机构信息

a Instituto de Medicina Molecular and Institute of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine , University of Lisbon , Lisbon , Portugal and.

b Department of Neurosciences and Mental Health , Hospital de Santa Maria - Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte , Lisbon , Portugal.

出版信息

Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2019 Aug;20(5-6):445-448. doi: 10.1080/21678421.2019.1606243. Epub 2019 Apr 28.

Abstract

: Functionality in ALS is usually assessed by the revised functional ALS rating scale (ALSFRS-R). The impact of dominant non-dominant side of upper limb (UL) onset on functionality has not been addressed before. : Consecutive patients with clear UL side dominance and followed in our unit were included. We considered three groups accordingly to side-of-onset: right (RUL), left (LUL) and bilateral UL onset forms. Patients were evaluated with ALSFRS-R, including its respiratory (RofALSFRS-R), bulbar (ALSFRSb), UL (ALSFRSul), and lower limb (ALSFRSll) subscores. T-test and X2 assessed differences. Patients were further compared regarding differences in writing (4th question, Q4, in the ALSFRS-R). A  < 0.01 was considered as meaningful. : From the 109 patients (75 men; mean onset age 61.36 ± 13.6; mean disease duration 23.1 ± 28.1 months), 65 had RUL, 38 LUL, and 6 bilateral UL onset forms. Right-side dominance was identified in 104. Patients with writing difficulties (87 in 109) had significantly lower ALSFRS-R and ALSFRSul ( < 0.001), presenting more problems in dressing ( < 0.001) and personal hygiene ( = 0.006). RUL patients had significantly lower Q4 scores than LUL ( = 0.002). No other differences were found between these two groups, including ALSFRS-R ( = 0.257) and ALSFRSul ( = 0.051). Functional impact on UL scores was similar between RUL and bilateral onset patients. Q4 scores were negatively influenced by hand-dominance in RUL patients ( = 0.007). : ALSFRS-R is an important tool to assess functional UL involvement in ALS. However, it can mislead clinicians when evaluating right-handed patients with initial LUL onset form. Hand dominance should be considered in ALS functional assessment.

摘要

:通常使用修订后的肌萎缩侧索硬化功能评定量表(ALSFRS-R)评估 ALS 患者的功能。但是,上肢(UL)起始的优势侧和非优势侧对上肢功能的影响尚未得到解决。

:连续纳入我们科室明确上肢优势侧且接受随访的患者。我们根据起始侧将患者分为三组:右侧 UL(RUL)、左侧 UL(LUL)和双侧 UL 起始形式。患者接受 ALSFRS-R 评估,包括呼吸(RofALSFRS-R)、球部(ALSFRSb)、UL(ALSFRSul)和下肢(ALSFRSll)亚评分。采用 T 检验和卡方检验评估差异。比较各组患者在书写(ALSFRS-R 的第 4 个问题,Q4)方面的差异。当 P<0.01 时认为差异有意义。

:在 109 例患者(75 例男性;平均发病年龄 61.36±13.6 岁;平均病程 23.1±28.1 个月)中,65 例为 RUL,38 例为 LUL,6 例为双侧 UL 起始形式。104 例患者存在右侧优势。87 例有书写困难的患者(109 例患者中的 87 例)的 ALSFRS-R 和 ALSFRSul 显著降低(P<0.001),在穿衣(P<0.001)和个人卫生(P=0.006)方面存在更多问题。RUL 患者的 Q4 评分明显低于 LUL(P=0.002)。两组之间,包括 ALSFRS-R(P=0.257)和 ALSFRSul(P=0.051),差异无统计学意义。RUL 和双侧 UL 起始患者的 UL 评分对功能的影响相似。RUL 患者的 Q4 评分受手优势的负面影响(P=0.007)。

:ALSFRS-R 是评估 ALS 患者 UL 功能的重要工具。但是,当评估初始 LUL 起始形式的右利手患者时,可能会误导临床医生。在 ALS 功能评估中应考虑手的优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验