Suppr超能文献

评估肌萎缩侧索硬化功能评分修订版(ALSFRS-r)对中国肌萎缩侧索硬化患者非优势手功能评估的效度。

Measuring the validation of assessing the non-dominant-hand function by ALSFRS-r in Chinese ALS patients.

作者信息

Hu Fangfang, Jin Jiaoting, Jia Rui, Xiang Li, Qi Huaguang, Zhao Xing, Dang Jingxia

机构信息

Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Medical College, Xi'an Jiaotong University, PR China.

Department of Neurology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Medical College, Xi'an Jiaotong University, PR China.

出版信息

J Clin Neurosci. 2017 Dec;46:17-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.08.036. Epub 2017 Sep 5.

Abstract

ALSFRS-r is a widely accepted rating scale for measuring the global function of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) patients, but we found some limitations of ALSFRS-r in assessing the function of non-dominant hand in Chinese ALS patients. We reviewed 95 ALS patients who expressed upper-limb symptoms at first visit and analyzed the ALSFRS-r score and subscale. In both upper limb involved patients, the ALSFRS-r had no difference between dominant-hand and non-dominant-hand onset groups (39.15±5.55 vs 38.0±5.91, p=0.477). But in only one upper limb involved patients, the ALSFRS-r score in non-dominant-hand onset patients was higher than dominant-hand onset patients (43.94±3.44 vs 40.87±4.42, p<0.05), especially in item of handwriting, cutting food and handing utensils (3.56±0.89 vs 2.2±1.27 p=0.001, 3.44±1.03 vs 1.8±1.21 p=0.000). When the item of cutting food and handing utensils was replaced by using food bowl and chopsticks to assess the function of non-dominant-hand, the modified ALSFRS-r score was significantly lower than original ALSFRS-r (43.94±3.44 vs 42.88±3.07 p=0.001), the progression rate was slower (0.81±0.63 vs 0.64±0.63, p=0.001). So, for Chinese ALS patients, using food bowl and chopsticks should replace the item of cutting food and handling utensils to assess the non-dominant-hand function, especially in non-dominant-hand onset patients.

摘要

肌萎缩侧索硬化功能评分修订版(ALSFRS-r)是一种广泛接受的用于衡量肌萎缩侧索硬化(ALS)患者整体功能的评定量表,但我们发现ALSFRS-r在中国ALS患者非优势手功能评估方面存在一些局限性。我们回顾了95例初诊时有上肢症状的ALS患者,并分析了ALSFRS-r评分及分量表。在双侧上肢受累患者中,优势手起病组和非优势手起病组的ALSFRS-r评分无差异(39.15±5.55 vs 38.0±5.91,p = 0.477)。但在仅单侧上肢受累患者中,非优势手起病患者的ALSFRS-r评分高于优势手起病患者(43.94±3.44 vs 40.87±4.42,p<0.05),尤其是在书写、切割食物和使用餐具项目上(3.56±0.89 vs 2.2±1.27,p = 0.001;3.44±1.03 vs 1.8±1.21,p = 0.000)。当将切割食物和使用餐具项目替换为使用饭碗和筷子来评估非优势手功能时,修订后的ALSFRS-r评分显著低于原始ALSFRS-r(43.94±3.44 vs 42.88±3.07,p = 0.001),进展率较慢(0.81±0.63 vs 0.64±0.63,p = 0.001)。因此,对于中国ALS患者,应使用饭碗和筷子来替代切割食物和使用餐具项目以评估非优势手功能,尤其是在非优势手起病患者中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验