Suppr超能文献

比较(R,S)-氯胺酮、(R)-氯胺酮和(S)-氯胺酮经鼻内给药后小鼠的抗抑郁作用和副作用。

Comparison of antidepressant and side effects in mice after intranasal administration of (R,S)-ketamine, (R)-ketamine, and (S)-ketamine.

机构信息

Division of Clinical Neuroscience, Chiba University Center for Forensic Mental Health, Chiba 260-8670, Japan.

Division of Clinical Neuroscience, Chiba University Center for Forensic Mental Health, Chiba 260-8670, Japan.

出版信息

Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2019 Jun;181:53-59. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2019.04.008. Epub 2019 Apr 26.

Abstract

The N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) antagonist (R,S)-ketamine produces rapid and sustained antidepressant effects in treatment-resistant patients with depression although intranasal use of (R,S)-ketamine in ketamine abusers is popular. In March 5, 2019, nasal spray of (S)-ketamine for treatment-resistant depression was approved as a new antidepressant by the US Food Drug Administration. Clinical study of (R)-ketamine is underway. In a chronic social defeat stress (CSDS) model, we compared the antidepressant effects of (R,S)-ketamine, (R)-ketamine, and (S)-ketamine after a single intranasal administration. Furthermore, we also compared the side effects (i.e., locomotion, prepulse inhibition (PPI), abuse liability) of these three compounds in mice. The order of potency of antidepressant effects after a single intranasal administration was (R)-ketamine > (R,S)-ketamine > (S)-ketamine. In contrast, the order of locomotor activity and prepulse inhibition (PPI) deficits after a single intranasal administration was (S)-ketamine > (R,S)-ketamine > (R)-ketamine. In the conditioned place preference (CPP) test, both (S)-ketamine and (R,S)-ketamine increased CPP scores in mice after repeated intranasal administration, in a dose dependent manner. In contrast, (R)-ketamine did not increase CPP scores in mice. These findings suggest that intranasal administration of (R)-ketamine would be a safer antidepressant than (R,S)-ketamine and (S)-ketamine.

摘要

N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸受体(NMDAR)拮抗剂(R,S)-氯胺酮在治疗抵抗性抑郁症患者中产生快速和持续的抗抑郁作用,尽管鼻内使用(R,S)-氯胺酮在氯胺酮滥用者中很流行。2019 年 3 月 5 日,美国食品药品监督管理局批准鼻喷(S)-氯胺酮用于治疗抵抗性抑郁症,作为一种新的抗抑郁药。(R)-氯胺酮的临床研究正在进行中。在慢性社会挫败应激(CSDS)模型中,我们比较了单次鼻内给药后(R,S)-氯胺酮、(R)-氯胺酮和(S)-氯胺酮的抗抑郁作用。此外,我们还比较了这三种化合物在小鼠中的副作用(即运动、前脉冲抑制(PPI)、滥用倾向)。单次鼻内给药后的抗抑郁作用强度顺序为(R)-氯胺酮>(R,S)-氯胺酮>(S)-氯胺酮。相比之下,单次鼻内给药后运动和前脉冲抑制(PPI)缺陷的顺序为(S)-氯胺酮>(R,S)-氯胺酮>(R)-氯胺酮。在条件性位置偏爱(CPP)测试中,(S)-氯胺酮和(R,S)-氯胺酮在重复鼻内给药后均以剂量依赖的方式增加了小鼠的 CPP 评分。相比之下,(R)-氯胺酮并未增加小鼠的 CPP 评分。这些发现表明,与(R,S)-氯胺酮和(S)-氯胺酮相比,(R)-氯胺酮经鼻内给药可能是一种更安全的抗抑郁药。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验