Laboratory of Cancer Biomarkers and Liquid Biopsy, Henan University, Kaifeng, 475004, Henan, China.
Center for Molecular Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, 341000, Jiangxi, China.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2019 Aug;84(2):299-305. doi: 10.1007/s00280-019-03847-w. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
Adjuvant chemotherapy treatment for different endometrial cancer stages is still debated. We aimed to evaluate the outcome of early (FIGO I-II) vs late stage (FIGO III-IV) endometrial cancer in an institutional experience using chemotherapy only after surgery.
Charts of patients with endometrial carcinoma who underwent surgery with postoperative chemotherapy between February 2012 and December 2017 were retrospectively identified, and the recurrence as well as prognosis were assessed.
Of the 272 eligible endometrioid adenocarcinoma (EA) patients, 127 had received chemotherapy, 145 did not receive chemotherapy; 37 were in late stage (FIGO III-IV) and 235 were in early stage (FIGO I-II). In the late stage group, patients with no chemotherapy had worse overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) as compared to the patients taking chemotherapy (OS, 28.6% vs 76.4%, P = 0.059; RFS, 17.1% vs 66.4%, P = 0.053). However, in the early stage group, there was no significant difference between the OS and RFS between the patients that were receiving and not receiving chemotherapy (OS, 84.1% vs 93.3%, P = 0.789; RFS, 76.7% vs 72.4%, P = 0.924). Independent predictive factors of recurrence were age over 53 years, histological grade G3, as well as late stages (FIGO III-IV), while independent predictive factors of OS were age over 53 years, deeper depth of myometrial invasion, and late stages (FIGO III-IV).
In late stages, patients with chemotherapy had lower recurrence rate and favorable OS as compared to patients not taking chemotherapy, which was the benefit of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, and chemotherapy might be strongly considered in late stage EA.
不同子宫内膜癌分期的辅助化疗治疗仍存在争议。我们旨在评估仅在手术后使用化疗的机构经验中早期(FIGO I-II)与晚期(FIGO III-IV)子宫内膜癌的结果。
回顾性确定了 2012 年 2 月至 2017 年 12 月期间接受手术和术后化疗的子宫内膜癌患者的病历,并评估了复发和预后。
在 272 名符合条件的子宫内膜样腺癌(EA)患者中,有 127 名接受了化疗,145 名未接受化疗;37 名处于晚期(FIGO III-IV),235 名处于早期(FIGO I-II)。在晚期组中,未接受化疗的患者总生存(OS)和无复发生存(RFS)明显低于接受化疗的患者(OS:28.6% vs 76.4%,P=0.059;RFS:17.1% vs 66.4%,P=0.053)。然而,在早期组中,接受和未接受化疗的患者的 OS 和 RFS 之间没有显著差异(OS:84.1% vs 93.3%,P=0.789;RFS:76.7% vs 72.4%,P=0.924)。复发的独立预测因素是年龄超过 53 岁、组织学分级 G3 以及晚期(FIGO III-IV),而 OS 的独立预测因素是年龄超过 53 岁、更深的肌层浸润深度和晚期(FIGO III-IV)。
在晚期,接受化疗的患者与未接受化疗的患者相比,复发率较低且 OS 较好,这是术后辅助化疗的获益,因此强烈考虑在晚期 EA 中使用化疗。