Krokoscz Marcelo, Ferreira Sueli M S P
Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado/FECAP, Av. Liberdade, 532, 01502-001 São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo/USP, Av. Prof. Lúcio Martins Rodrigues, 443, 05508-020 São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
An Acad Bras Cienc. 2019;91(2):e20180196. doi: 10.1590/0001-3765201920180196. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
Our objective was to identify the understanding of theoretical aspects and the interpretation of practical situations that a sample of 3,623 graduate students (Population = 22,438) at the University of São Paulo (Brazil) have regarding academic plagiarism. The survey used an electronic questionnaire containing 30 multiple choice questions developed from the literature concerning the concept and definition of plagiarism, occurrence modality, types of plagiarism, reasons for occurrence, standards and preventive actions adopted. We identified that the fact of respondents agreeing or disagreeing with the theoretical-conceptual characteristics of plagiarism did not make a difference in their capacity of correctly assessing practical situations characterizing plagiarism. Moreover, the agreement or disagreement responses regarding the concepts of plagiarism were observed not to differ among the respondents who had been trained to use references and citations. However, the same respondents correctly interpret practical situations characterizing plagiarism. Therefore, this study suggests that there is a gap between theoretical and practical knowledge regarding plagiarism for graduate students. Although the technical training related to the correct use of research sources is an important prerequisite in the capacity-building process, it does not seem to be enough to prevent plagiarism practices.
我们的目标是确定巴西圣保罗大学的3623名研究生(总体为22438人)对学术抄袭在理论方面的理解以及对实际情况的解读。该调查使用了一份电子问卷,其中包含30道多项选择题,这些题目是根据有关抄袭的概念和定义、发生方式、抄袭类型、发生原因、所采用的标准和预防措施的文献编写的。我们发现,受访者对抄袭的理论概念特征持同意或不同意的态度,这对他们正确评估抄袭实际情况的能力并无影响。此外,在接受过使用参考文献和引用训练的受访者中,关于抄袭概念的同意或不同意回答并无差异。然而,同样这些受访者能够正确解读构成抄袭的实际情况。因此,本研究表明,研究生在抄袭的理论知识和实践知识之间存在差距。尽管与正确使用研究资源相关的技术培训是能力建设过程中的一个重要前提,但这似乎不足以防止抄袭行为。