Zhao Sheng Gang, Xu Jian Jiang, Tao Zhen Hao, Jin Lei, Liu Qin, Zheng Wen Yue, Jiang Li Qin, Wang Ning Fu
1 Department of Cardiology, The Affiliated Hangzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.
2 Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, Zhejiang Province, China.
J Int Med Res. 2019 Jun;47(6):2533-2544. doi: 10.1177/0300060519841836. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
To evaluate the ability of two scoring systems (CHADS-VASc score and CHADS-VASc+hyperlipidaemia+smoking [CHADS-VASc-HS score]) to predict in-stent restenosis (ISR) among patients undergoing drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation.
This retrospective study enrolled patients who underwent coronary angiography to assess coronary artery disease severity secondary to a diagnosis of stable angina or acute coronary syndrome that subsequently underwent DES implantations. Demographic, clinical, angiographic and biochemical parameters were compared between those patients that experienced ISR and those that did not during the study follow-up period. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate associations between the baseline parameters, the two scoring systems and ISR risk.
A total of 358 patients (non-ISR group n = 316; ISR group n = 42) participated in the study. Compared with the non-ISR group, more patients in the ISR group had diabetes mellitus and received stents with smaller diameters but longer lengths. There were no significant differences with regard the predictive ability for ISR of either the CHADS-Vasc or the CHADS-Vasc-HS scores. Multivariate logistic regression analyses demonstrated that stent diameter, follow-up duration and glycosylated haemoglobin were independent risk factors for ISR.
The CHADS-Vasc and CHADS-Vasc-HS scores did not predict ISR in patients after coronary DES placement.
评估两种评分系统(CHADS-VASc评分和CHADS-VASc+高脂血症+吸烟[CHADS-VASc-HS评分])预测接受药物洗脱支架(DES)植入患者支架内再狭窄(ISR)的能力。
这项回顾性研究纳入了接受冠状动脉造影以评估继发于稳定型心绞痛或急性冠状动脉综合征诊断的冠状动脉疾病严重程度、随后接受DES植入的患者。在研究随访期间,对发生ISR的患者和未发生ISR的患者的人口统计学、临床、血管造影和生化参数进行了比较。采用单因素和多因素逻辑回归分析来评估基线参数、两种评分系统与ISR风险之间的关联。
共有358例患者(非ISR组n = 316;ISR组n = 42)参与了研究。与非ISR组相比,ISR组中有更多患者患有糖尿病,并且接受了直径较小但长度较长的支架。CHADS-Vasc评分或CHADS-Vasc-HS评分对ISR的预测能力没有显著差异。多因素逻辑回归分析表明,支架直径、随访时间和糖化血红蛋白是ISR的独立危险因素。
CHADS-Vasc评分和CHADS-Vasc-HS评分不能预测冠状动脉DES置入术后患者的ISR。