The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, United States.
OB Hospitalist Group, Baylor All-Saints Medical Center, Fort Worth, TX, United States.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 May 1;7(5):e10520. doi: 10.2196/10520.
Risk-appropriate prenatal care has been asserted as a way for the cost-effective delivery of prenatal care. A virtual care model for prenatal care has the potential to provide patient-tailored, risk-appropriate prenatal educational content and may facilitate vital sign and weight monitoring between visits. Previous studies have demonstrated a safe reduction in the frequency of in-person prenatal care visits among low-risk patients but have noted a reduction in patient satisfaction.
The primary objective of this study was to test the effectiveness of a mobile prenatal care app to facilitate a reduced in-person visit schedule for low-risk pregnancies while maintaining patient and provider satisfaction.
This controlled trial compared a control group receiving usual care with an experimental group receiving usual prenatal care and using a mobile prenatal care app. The experimental group had a planned reduction in the frequency of in-person office visits, whereas the control group had the usual number of visits. The trial was conducted at 2 diverse outpatient obstetric (OB) practices that are part of a single academic center in Washington, DC, United States. Women were eligible for enrollment if they presented to care in the first trimester, were aged between 18 and 40 years, had a confirmed desired pregnancy, were not considered high-risk, and had an iOS or Android smartphone that they used regularly. We measured the effectiveness of a virtual care platform for prenatal care via the following measured outcomes: the number of in-person OB visits during pregnancy and patient satisfaction with prenatal care.
A total of 88 patients were enrolled in the study, 47 in the experimental group and 41 in the control group. For patients in the experimental group, the average number of in-person OB visits during pregnancy was 7.8 and the average number in the control group was 10.2 (P=.01). There was no statistical difference in patient satisfaction (P>.05) or provider satisfaction (P>.05) in either group.
The use of a mobile prenatal care app was associated with reduced in-person visits, and there was no reduction in patient or provider satisfaction.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02914301; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02914301 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/76S55M517).
风险适宜的产前护理已被证明是一种具有成本效益的产前护理方式。产前虚拟护理模式有可能提供针对患者的、适宜风险的产前教育内容,并可促进就诊期间的生命体征和体重监测。先前的研究表明,低风险患者的面对面产前护理就诊次数可安全减少,但患者满意度降低。
本研究的主要目的是测试移动产前护理应用程序的有效性,以促进低风险妊娠减少面对面就诊次数,同时保持患者和提供者的满意度。
这项对照试验比较了接受常规护理的对照组和接受常规产前护理并使用移动产前护理应用程序的实验组。实验组计划减少面对面就诊次数,而对照组则保持常规就诊次数。该试验在美国华盛顿特区的一个学术中心的 2 个不同的妇产科(OB)门诊进行。如果患者在孕早期就诊、年龄在 18 至 40 岁之间、确认有意愿妊娠、不被认为是高危妊娠且有一部他们经常使用的 iOS 或 Android 智能手机,则符合入组条件。我们通过以下测量结果来衡量虚拟产前护理平台的有效性:怀孕期间的面对面 OB 就诊次数和患者对产前护理的满意度。
共有 88 名患者入组研究,实验组 47 名,对照组 41 名。实验组患者怀孕期间的平均面对面 OB 就诊次数为 7.8 次,对照组为 10.2 次(P=.01)。两组患者满意度(P>.05)或提供者满意度(P>.05)均无统计学差异。
使用移动产前护理应用程序与减少面对面就诊次数相关,且不会降低患者或提供者的满意度。
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02914301;https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02914301(由 WebCite 存档,http://www.webcitation.org/76S55M517)。