Sabetrohani Hamideh, Koohpayehzadeh Jalil, Sheikhtaheri Abbas, Goli Shahrbanoo, Abhari Maryam Biglari, Keramat Afsaneh
Student Research Committee, School of Nursing and Midwifery Shahroud University of Medical Sciences Shahroud Semnan Province Iran.
Preventive Medicine and Public Health Research Center, Community and Family Medicine Department, School of Medicine Iran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.
Health Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 18;8(8):e71150. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.71150. eCollection 2025 Aug.
The use of virtual technologies in prenatal care has significantly increased, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic; however, the implications of this approach remain a topic of discussion. This review aimed to categorize virtual-based prenatal care methods and their reported clinical and nonclinical outcomes.
This scoping review was conducted by searching the Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, ProQuest, SID, Irandoc, Magiran databases, and Google Scholar search engine from January 2005 to February 2021 and completed until December 2023. Our included studies were quantitative and review studies in English that mentioned virtual prenatal care and related outcomes. We followed the narrative approach for presenting and synthesizing results and PRISMA-ScR guidelines for the accompanying explanation.
After retrieving 1324 studies and removing duplicates, 35 articles were reviewed. We divided virtual-based prenatal care into two main categories: only using virtual methods and modified care models by virtual methods. Mhealth was the most widely used virtual care method due to its accessibility to most mothers, low cost, and use of dedicated apps. The reported outcomes were also classified into seven subcategories. Maternal and neonatal outcomes, maternal and provider satisfaction, and change in patient knowledge, attitude, and practice were the three most commonly reported outcomes.
Improvement of a variety of clinical and nonclinical outcomes is anticipated to facilitate the effective implementation of tailored virtual interventions for mothers, ultimately improving health outcomes for both mothers and fetuses.
虚拟技术在产前护理中的应用显著增加,尤其是在新冠疫情期间;然而,这种方法的影响仍是一个讨论话题。本综述旨在对基于虚拟技术的产前护理方法及其报告的临床和非临床结果进行分类。
本范围综述通过检索2005年1月至2021年2月的Web of Science、PubMed、Scopus、ProQuest、SID、Irandoc、Magiran数据库以及谷歌学术搜索引擎进行,并持续到2023年12月。纳入的研究为英文的定量研究和综述研究,提及虚拟产前护理及相关结果。我们采用叙述方法呈现和综合结果,并遵循PRISMA-ScR指南进行附带解释。
在检索到1324项研究并去除重复项后,对35篇文章进行了综述。我们将基于虚拟技术的产前护理分为两大类:仅使用虚拟方法和通过虚拟方法改进的护理模式。移动健康(mhealth)是使用最广泛的虚拟护理方法,因为它对大多数母亲来说易于获取、成本低且使用专用应用程序。报告的结果也分为七个子类别。孕产妇和新生儿结局、孕产妇和提供者满意度以及患者知识、态度和行为的改变是最常报告的三个结果。
预计各种临床和非临床结果的改善将有助于为母亲有效实施量身定制的虚拟干预措施,最终改善母亲和胎儿的健康结局。